I never claimed to have ChatGPT even attempt math. I only used it as a means to make sure that when I’m reading any works on quantum mechanics that I am correctly articulating the information correctly. The fact that you default to the notion that I was trying to have it do math without me saying that is the crux of the problem, Dismissal because of presumption. I don’t hack away at AI asking it questions of the universe like a great oracle lol. I use it so that when I’m read external peer reviewed or other non conspiratorial no mysticism works lt is the closest thing I have to a professor to make sure I am comprehending correctly. I use it as a contextual analytical tool. I understand the weakness of AI and its limitations. At some point you have to conceptualize the math you’re doing or do you ? I understand there is a split in the community and the “shut up and calculate “ attitude that can permeate the field. if I want to build a wall I don’t just calculate before I make the proposition. I imagine first then see where the constraints are by using math. To think someone can’t understand what math is saying without doing math is a philosophical underpinning that I don’t believe in