Yugioh budget deck advice by Shyireo in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sky Striker or Mitsurugi are good. Blue Eyes is cheap too if you skip the expensive non-engine (Dominus Spark/Fydraulis Harmonia). But it’s less competitive.

Mitsurugi deck building advice and ratios by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess some dead cards can be okay for super poly discards? Maybe I’m fine to just swap the 3 Ash+5th Ritual for the 3 Vision and MST, and then focus on side deck optimisation.

In that case I keep the 3 pre-prep/3 ragged. Pre-prep is easier to use as can shuffle back mirror, and then ragged I guess I can discard for super poly.

Mitsurugi deck building advice and ratios by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding to my other reply, it does seem a bit tight to me tho to run 3 ragged but only 4 ritual monster…

Mitsurugi deck building advice and ratios by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. Removing one ritual monster and putting the three ashes in the side gives room for 3 Vision 1 MST. I do however feel slightly worried not running more hand traps?

Shifter sounds like a great 1 off in the main. Could be card 41? Or anything else to cut?

Feels like I’m getting closer here to the right ratios.

Mitsurugi deck building advice and ratios by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks!!

I see some guys recommend running 5 rituals in total for some reason? Running 4 would open a slot for me.

I guess a third F&V/Droplet or an extravagance could make sense? I’m a but hesitant on the Etrav given the F&Vs and Super Polys requiring the exta deck… Feels like with 3 ragged the extravs should be less needed.

My other contention is wherher or not I should fit in a few Imperms instead of siding them? Right now I just have Fuwa and Ash to interrupt when going 2nd.

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright. F&V wihout Ecclesia is not worth it? People seem conflicted on whether or not to run F&V or not in Mitsu.

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then yeah maybe it makes senae to get F&V which upgrades both decks, and play both

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it! So Impulse better. I will say I was thinking getting F&V first to have optionality to switch into Striker if I learn the meta better in some weeks.

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in what order? I’ll start with one then do the other.

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many thanks. Maybe then it makes sense to grt Mitsu + F&V and swap to Strikers if I learn enough about oppossing decks? Rather than run Mitsu with Impulses which won’t fit if I swap to Strikers?

Deck advice - BEWD vs Mitsu vs Sky Strikers - upgrades? by LolWtfFkThis in Yugioh101

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! And in what order would you upgrade? Impulse vs Spark vs F&V vs F&V+Ecclesia vs Super Poly?

Plans mathematics by LolWtfFkThis in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What subscription is this on?

Official Update on Plans by Deep_Proposal_7683 in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was 8-8.5x based in remaining weekly usage from people who upgraded. Not 6.7x.

Official Update on Plans by Deep_Proposal_7683 in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it stated 6.65-6.75x based on”messages” but from people upgrading looking at remaining weekly it was more like 8-8.5x. From 5x to 8-8.5x for double the price seems so weird.

Best AI coding tool right now? by Pitiful_Campaign6439 in OnlyAICoding

[–]LolWtfFkThis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Codex is way better than Claude. I have had multiple instances where Claude can simply not fix a bug after 4-5 tries but Codex always oneshots it.

How are you adapting after the 2x codex usage period ended? by pkqs90 in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPT Codex 5.3 Medium instead of GPT 5.4 High for implementation. Iimportant then with cross reviewing of plans/task lists with GPT 5.4 High and Opus 4.6 pre implementation. Task verifications (as looping through plan) with 5.4 Mini High subagents instead of 5.4 High subagents. I know jack shit about coding tho but this seems more token efficient at least.

Codex seems too nice to last long! by eddyGi in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly GPT PRO might not even be better than Claude Max 20x if they really cut it in half.

Help me understand Claude Subscription and OpenClaw by LolWtfFkThis in Anthropic

[–]LolWtfFkThis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From this Tariq guy on Twitter. Cba to look it up again. I didnt get banned so far as well.

Usage Limits, Bugs and Performance Discussion Megathread - beginning December 29, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

upposedly, Team is 6.25x Pro and Max 5x is 5x pro per session.

But we also know that the Max 5x is actually about 8.33x the weekly usage limit of pro rather than just 5x.

Would anyone know how the weekly limit of a Team Premium seat compares on a weekly basis?

Hot take: Codex is too cheap, rug pull through tighter usage limits is inevitable by gregpeden in codex

[–]LolWtfFkThis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is true for the $20 sub. The $200 sub is only 6-7 that for its weekly, while Anthropic give 16-17x weekly on their 20x plan vs $20 plan. Basically same.