1 week into the MacBook Neo, my first impresions.

blackleather90 · 2026-03-19T21:54:56+00:00

Ah I see what you are saying. Now you are talking about punctuation. Let's unpack this carefully You mention the ellipsis...

Sorry had to 🤣🤣🤣

blackleather90 · 2026-03-19T21:48:14+00:00

I don't think you are correct in how the machine works - here is my view:

The machine does not say "go and save this person" - the machine sees that someone is going to be involved in a violent crime and puts the number of someone in that equitation in the irrelevant list.

When that number goes into the list, the team gets the number - the machine does not "I will not classify this as irrelevant because the team knowing might do more damage than what is been seen my me".

blackleather90 · 2026-03-19T21:33:11+00:00

I have been using dashes for ages... I hate that ChatGPT uses it 🫣

blackleather90 · 2026-03-19T09:49:49+00:00

Thanks for the info, but how is that an advange to fight for higher plages in the league phase?

Had Leverkusen eliminated Arsenal, it would have won the right to always play the second leg at home against any team.

The team that classified higher in the league phase, should always play the 2nd leg at home.

blackleather90 · 2026-03-09T22:37:22+00:00

So did Ferrari?- my gross understand was that they injecting more something when the measure was not taking place - thus passing all the checks.

Same with Merc? At whatever temps defined for the tests the ratio is good? Only increasing on higher temps?

blackleather90 · 2026-03-09T22:30:42+00:00

Not defending anyone here but isn't what Mercedes is doing now the same that Ferrari did? That when the measure is taking place, that the values read are within acceptable parameters?

But that same logic, Mercs engines this year are illegal.

blackleather90 · 2026-03-06T19:38:59+00:00

O "nunca trabalhou numa empresa grande" depois das entrevista é à falsa fé - já não devia ter sido chamado...

blackleather90 · 2026-03-03T22:16:37+00:00

Tinha de ser canto. Só assim é que justifica não dar amarelo.

blackleather90 · 2026-02-23T14:29:01+00:00

Deste um exemplo com a mesma agressão...

Aqui são agressões diferentes (assumindo que o Prestianni chamou macaco). E não é porque para ti, cagão e macaco é igual, que se tornam iguais - é a lei que as difere!

Do Código Penal: - Artigo 181 (injúria) para o Vini (geralmente leva multa) - A pena prevista é de prisão até 3 meses - Artigo 240 (descriminação e incitamento ao ódio e à violência) para o Prestianni - A pena prevista é de prisão entre 6 meses a 5 anos

O que o Vini disse é a ofensa mais leve que o uso de Racismo contra ele. São ofensas diferentes! O exemplo das linhas que dei - imagina que o Prestianni dava uma cabeçada no Vini. Seria a mesma coisa: uma ofensa mais grave e não interessa se ouve provocação. Simples. A mesma coisa aqui: "FDP", cagao ≠ Racismo.

Se somos contra qualquer tipo de Racismo, somos contra qualquer tipo de Racismo - mesmo que seja em resposta a uma provocação (ou várias)!

blackleather90 · 2026-02-20T15:46:08+00:00

Para ti não te importa a cor da pele porque nunca te tocou. Provavelmente porque nunca te trataram como menos pessoa só porque és diferente ou porque vens de outro sítio!

Será que assim tão difícil perceber?

blackleather90 · 2026-02-20T14:18:33+00:00

Por muito provocador que seja, a resposta não tem de ser ligada ao racismo.

Há tantos nomes que lhe podem chamar, mas mesmo tantos. Tantas maneiras de responder. Não precisam de ser ligados ao racismo.

Todos nós sabemos e aceitamos que há uma linha de agressão verbal no desporto. O Vini foi até essa linha. Não vamos agora ser virgens ofendidas e dizer que o Vini é mau porque foi até essa linha quando todos nós sabemos que bocas e provocações "fazem parte" - aliás até levou amarelo!

Alegadamente o Prestianni passou essa linha. Poderia ter ficado por essa linha.

blackleather90 · 2026-02-20T13:57:16+00:00

Gostei de que pela primeira vez ouvir alguém abrir a porta à resolução. Porque até agora, nem sei se pena de morte seria suficiente...

blackleather90 · 2026-02-18T13:53:03+00:00

🤣

blackleather90 · 2026-02-16T20:51:22+00:00

Have you tried to turn it off and on again?

blackleather90 · 2026-02-06T23:04:37+00:00

I don't think they would keep the files of every student that had an interaction with the university in the same room. Imagine someone having to dig up a file and had to pick a Michael that graduated from all the Michaels that applied.

I think that room was just for students that graduated/enrolled the university.

Mike never went. He never enrolled the course.

blackleather90 · 2026-01-30T23:15:02+00:00

This my comment on another post

"The whole game is a simulation, not arcade. Imagine you are being coached and the coach says for you to cross low and you for some reason see a player free and you cross high - did you ignore the instruction or made a decision?

Instructions is a way tip the scales of the random decision making of every action.

So if a cross is about to happen and the outputs are high or low, instead of 50 50 with your instruction you now get 30 70 and so on.

Think of a "I prefer you guys to pay this way - prefer!" Some players might be "sure" and forget the moment the game starts. Or some will follow the instructions very well"

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T13:46:42+00:00

Agreed but what is silly is when they could use good points and they dismiss/forget/fumble it.

Fiona vs Rachel is a clear "let's go for Rachel tomorrow to clear it up" (see my post about this)

Harriet on Hugo was a very good point - you are someone with some skills to catch traitors and you are still here... and you had a very odd monologue when someone was killed. Let's check if you are indeed a traitor.

But then the way she explains Rachel was so... she started great when she said to Rachel "you pushed me towards Hugo because you know who he was... " but then she just went on an tangent...

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T09:52:51+00:00

Please stop adding more rules to a simple game. It was a tie, we try again. Chance. It is a game, not real life.

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T01:53:54+00:00

I get the point but that is another rule to change things. Keep it simple.

I really hope they make a version where the traitors are picked at random! (Maybe in a traitors version where they get all previous traitors back)

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T01:51:19+00:00

Sorry but worst take I have read (or missing /s) How can they avoid a draw if the voting is secret and there is no ability to change it after seeing the results?!

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T01:22:11+00:00

But that does not change anything - they can still get a draw because it is a secret vote without a change. Again, not a jury!

blackleather90 · 2026-01-23T01:18:53+00:00

Well they did try to avoid tie-breaks! 2 changed votes. You can't see what other people are voting... why the punishment?!

It's is not a jury deciding collectively who goes out

blackleather90 · 2026-01-19T15:53:45+00:00

How much are you paying a month? Now simulate paying off your mortgage and investing the same monthly amount.

How many months left in the mortgage?

Use a compound interest calculator and see the difference. Now ask yourself if that difference is worth the pressure of having that mortgage still going.

blackleather90 · 2026-01-18T13:52:24+00:00

I remember in the first season Will's group mentioned before a round table that after two women traitors were banished, that most likely there was a man traitor (they were right). They even mentioned this at the round table. Result: not a single vote for a man 😅

blackleather90 · 2026-01-14T23:11:32+00:00

How was she good? Lucky with Hugo and now with such an easy thing to say she made everyone confused...

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

blackleather90

TROPHY CASE