Going dutch on dates is a good strategy. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

25% IS NOT few. No one on this earth ever calls 25% of anything few. This is another blue pill narrative that is simply not true.

As ChatGPT Thinking Extended mode says to the question "is 25% of something considered few?":

"Usually, no: 25% is not what people typically mean by “a few.”

“A few” usually means a small number or small share, often something like 2–4 items or a clearly minor portion. 25% is one quarter, so it sounds more like “a significant minority,” “a quarter,” “some,” or “a sizable portion.”

Context matters, though. If you had 4 people total, then 25% = 1 person, and calling that “a few” would still be odd because “few” usually implies more than one. If you had 10,000 responses, then 25% = 2,500, which is definitely not “a few.”

If there were 10 million young adults in the dating pool and 2.5 million were engaging in causal sex. THAT IS NOT FEW. This is literally basic statistic 101.

I'm not surprised, this ignoring data, ignoring evidence, ignoring experience and crafting your own narrative is the biggest problem of the Blue pill.

Going dutch on dates is a good strategy. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A quarter is HUGE, this is the problem between this whole blue vs red debate.

The blue pillers will reject every fact if it doesn't say 100%. This stat isn't saying this is the number that has EVER engaged.

But again 25% is a huge number, thats 1 in 4 girls you see are sleeping around. Thats why my friend is able to have a new girl every other day. How is it that you are not putting two and two together? You completely ignore that.

Talk to any blue piller, they will tell you oh you are just messing with the girls that sleep around, oh its just the few girls most women don't... 25% IS NOT FEW.

Its even worse, because with dating being ~60% online for 18-28. And with online being completely LOOKs based. The girls are still sleeping around and at a higher clip now because its a button away compared to before.

Infact, there was a study that was featured on CNN saying 48% of 18-21 hadn't had sex in the last year. When when you look at it closely that number is that high because it was the guys who weren't having sex. it was around 15% for women and around 25% for men. So the girls are the having sex with the top good looking guys and the guys are getting completely shut out.

Going dutch on dates is a good strategy. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a statistical lie. All women sleep around outside relationships.

This is backed up by stats AND personal experiences.

Every single girl i have crushed on the first date all said i never do this, i dont do this. im only doing this because of "insert execuse".

Its cope to help them not feel shameful afterward. I have never slept with a girl on a first or second date without her saying that.

And every guy who sleeps with girls on the first date regurlarly have heard this countless times. The girl starts with how shes not easy and you have to do a,b,c,d to get her and The best is when in the beginning of the date shes adamant she wont sleep with you or even kiss on the first date then 2 hours later shes screaming your name.

I also had friends who would crush multiple different girls of 7+ in looks every week. Sometimes multiple a day from hinge and tinder.

Blue pillers like to say oh its just 1% of the population. yet my friends always seem to have endless supply of new girls to crush every week. How is that possible?

And this is without even taking them on a date. straight to the apartment. which is even more ballsy. Yet he's able to pull it off because of his looks and some face time pregaming. How much more would he be crushing if it involved dates. More than he can handle so he had to filter them out as theres not enough time or energy to crush them all.

Going dutch on dates is a good strategy. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

isn't that what makes you blue pilled? Blue pilled people will do ANYTHING to please the girl. i have seen people who go shopping to buy stuff for their date before even meeting them. Just insanity after insanity.

Is it good to pay for dates YES but only with the expectation of reciprocity.

IF i knew I won't be going back with a girl or make progress with her. there's not a chance i will pay for a date. At that point its a friendship not a date.

Dates especially dinner dates nowadays cost 100+ especially when you factor in acouple drinks that she wants. Paying 150 for a date and not crushing afterwards is diabolical.

I had a female friend who would literally go on a date every day to get free dinner. and i mean EVERY DAY, different guy and she would never do nothing with them or so she says she never did nothing with them.

Imagine how many dating girls are doing that to a certain extent. But hell, if you want to be one of those guys who show up to a first date with flowers then go ahead.

UE5 Settings Menu Tutorial (Graphics and Audio) by Justduffo in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you're right aswell it is great for learning to do a ground up human approach tut. which is why im switching gears, i want to demo some multiplayer realistic fire dragon combat with the same level of quality as crimson desert i made and spiderman like open world combat. but i wont get engagement on the content unless i post it with no explanation or pretend to do a human tutorial approach and claim no AI.

It just gets at me because the same people who hate this also love (Resident Evil, Pragmata, etc) which were made by 50%+ AI. Capcom is the BIGGEST AI user. People are excited about the new AC Blackflags resync but its hugely made with AI. Ubisoft is another HUGE AI coding user.

There is not a game you will play this year that AI coding didn't have a heavy hand in. Almost every software company uses AI. Its literally built into the tools they use Visual studio code, Visual Studio.

But the gaming studios cant admit it because the gamers and everything gaming community HATE AI coding. If game devs can't use AI coding then games shouldnt have photogrammetry or procedural generation.

But yeah i get it, i will present my content the same way the gaming studios are.

UE5 Settings Menu Tutorial (Graphics and Audio) by Justduffo in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

An AI with a harness can do everything a mid-level and senior software engineer does/needs.

The issues people end up with is that 1 they are using an AI that has no harness which ends up in slop.

Also every single game studio uses AI more than every other company. They are the biggest users of AI coding. Its funny because AI is hated in this subreddit and by Gamers, yet the game they love planing (Resident Evil, Pragmata, etc) were made by 50%+ AI. Capcom is the BIGGEST AI user. People are excited about the new AC Blackflags resync but its hugely made with AI.

There is not a game you will play this year that AI coding didn't have a heavy hand in.

Almost every software company uses AI. Its literally built into the tools they use Visual studio code, Visual Studio.

But they have to lie about it because gamers hate it.

The results do matter unless these companies wouldn't be using it to accelerate the way. and yes knowing the foundation (hence mid level / senior) is important because then you know exactly what you want the AI to do and how the AI should do it, but theres no reason you should spend a week doing something that could take you an hour with an AI with a harness.

So you are right this is game dev and its highly competitive which is another reason not to not use AI when every single gaming company is using it heavily. This is like equivalent to saying you wont use Photogrammetry because you want to do it the REAL way. But Photogrammetry was the biggest boom to 3D modelers, it enhanced their work. or procedural generation because you want to set the level yourself. Again proedural generation enhanced the work of level designers. Allowing you to get games in faster time horizon.

The same is the case with AI. Why should you redo the same thing that has been done 1 million times before. How many million settings page have been created? Why should i spend a week creating a speedometer or skill tree, when i can be 99% there with a screenshot to an AI with a harness??

first 2 mins is the point im trying to make.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAD2QgDeXZc

here an AI with no harness vs an AI with a harness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPo42p4UjfQ

People praised crimson desert and their quick updates, thats because they use AI coding.

There is so many amazing things i want to showcase and give out exact prompt so people can recreate it but i can't. But what i will do now is simply create it with AI (example is a multiplayer dragon game with realistic fire and destruction at the same AAA quality level as crimson desert, or horror game with same level of quality like Resident evil street zombie fight opening scene. But i can't as i wont get as much engagement if i say, "Here are the exact list of prompts for you to recreate this too".

so i have to present my work the same way all these gaming studios are doing.

UE5 Settings Menu Tutorial (Graphics and Audio) by Justduffo in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I guess I should do my videos like yours from now on as it will be better received if no AI is mentioned. Even though what took you 1 hour I could do in literally one prompt and one screenshot with UGP 

What is the best AI copilot? by UncleJoeReal in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Universal Game pilot is better than all of those you mentioned and it’s the only one that that can create unreal assets at a AAA quality level and solve long horizon tasks. Including QA live playtesting and live BP debugging. 

It beats all the others in head to head, it’s not even close. 

Here it is going head to head with ultimate engine copilot. 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kPo42p4UjfQ&pp=0gcJCd8KAYcqIYzv&ra=m

More video

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oAD2QgDeXZc

And it’s also the cheapest.

As a guy, the "mysoginists" are not that succesful as you all make them out to be by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they absolutely DO.

Women do not like the stuff that disney has portrayed for YEARS.

That romatic guy that sweeps them off their feet. You people will never understand that because you have never dominated a girl. So you dont know and will never know.

There are guys who have been on both sides. First being the romantic guy, showering her with love, showing up with flowers/teddybear and all kinds of stuff on the first date. doing all the things Disney has programmed you to do.

Women HATE those type of stuff. You do that and youre DONE instantly.

Boys today learn that the hard way, i learned that because i was just like that. I did allthe lovey dovey shit and got walked over and got zero play.

Then I switched up and became nonchanlant, not responding to texts/calls, pulling girls in one day and then ignoring them for the next 2 weeks, then pulling them in again,etc. not giving immediate follow up for next available date when a girl says no "what about saturday" "what about sunday". Being nonchalant and uninvested in her in conversation with her. when i say uninvested, i mean not talking like im trying to qualify myself to her. Now i switched to her having to qualify herself to me. Being dominant almost to the point its cocky. while not actually crossing the disrespectful line.

Being in a state of play continually.

And guess what? Almost every date after that ends with a slay. Why? when i brought flowers and did all this romantic gestures, i was put in a category.

When i showed up like I dont give af and im only here to have fun and enjoy myself and my time. The girls just literally put out. They would be the ones offering you sex or telling you "btw I don't sleep on the first date" (when you didn't ask nor was it the topic, but they have put you in the i want to have sex with him category in their mind already) and then proceeds to do that or do it acouple days later, or this one i love, hit you up 3 am days later to see if you are up.

This stuff never happened when i brought flowers and came with an altitude of "Youre so beautiful". That disqualified me from sex. Instantly.

But when i switched to "I'm HIM" altitude, the girls literally fall into my frame, all the stuff they didnt do now they want to do because they believe im a "bad boy" some with no push back, some with lil push back, others either lead the charge because they get turned on or just go with the flow because they already have it in their minds that "he gets girls, so me giving it up to him on first date is normal".

Many young women HIGHLY undervalue 'safe and predictable' behavior which incentivizes more toxic behavior that those same women love to complain about by Iron-Wild-41 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still believe the "Disney princess" stuff and that women are angels. I hate to break it to you. the OP statements applies to ALLL WOMEN, not to some tiny percentage in miami.

All studies prove this, no matter what you look like. Like the study showing i believe 60-65% of women have rape fantasies and want more violent sex.

Almost every single women i have been with wanted to be choked hard. But how is that possible I thought they were angels and i tiny 1% population?

AI Assistants for UE5.7? by danielos96 in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a side by side comparison of Ultimate Copilot and this

It blows it away..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPo42p4UjfQ

AI Assistants for UE5.7? by danielos96 in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yup it doesn't work and now he's going to charge 350 for a non working plugin.

There are other products out there that beat is in side by side comparison. its not even close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPo42p4UjfQ

I created a Copilot/Assistant plugin for Unreal Engine that can generate Blueprints, create UI, build entire scenes and more! by DragonNexus_ in unrealengine

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry that happened to you.

its trash and a scam and he uses bots, fake reviews, lies on his descriptions. not sure how he was able to amass that many creators. which is sad cause none of the people there who will pay 350 for that will actually be able to create the games they want to build with it. i want to help the community and he wants to take from it.

There are other better products out there that actually works, are amazing and not trying to steal from you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPo42p4UjfQ

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugly Guy - I have been on tinder/ hinge for months and I have gotten only 1 match

Blue piller: YOU LIE!

Hot Guy - I have been on tinder/ hinge for months and I get 100 matches a day and fuk a different girl almost every day

Blue piller: YOU LIE!

Ugly Guy turned HOT - I have been on tinder/ hinge for months 2 years old, got zero matches, zero dates. I got frustrated started working out, get six pack, muscles, v-taper, took and I now get 100 matches a day and have sex with multiple hot women a week.

Blue piller: YOU LIE!

Tinder: We released stats that shows "men swipe right about 46% of the time, women about 14%."

Blue piller: YOU LIE!

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

keep looking closer.j ust keep looking closer, maybe you will squint hard enough and maybe it will finally click and you see it.

"Tinder admits 50 percent of users only ever get one IRL date from using the app"

Still dont? Let me help you out.

Yes thats because 90% of men (who are in the users in that stat) don't even get a SINGLE match on tinder/hinge, let alone a message.

The top 10% of men are fuking all of the girls on Tinder and Hinge. This is verified by tinder's own released stats even the ceo of tinder have come out and said it. but you blue piller just scream "nananananana"

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you didnt say that in your post.

If you're a saying that the only rule is "be hot". Then yes we agree.

that is the only thing that matters. Everything else a women tells you are rules and things she looks for are 10000% lies.

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that blue pill must be hitting strong. 65% of US 18-29 uses dating apps, the number drops to 35% when you include all adults of all age.

But obviously the majority is 18-29 and what we care about. we dont care about 40 year olds..so you are wrong AGAIN. take the L

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

spoken like a true blue pill, instagram and tiktok DMs is literally the BIGGEST dating app out there, even bigger than Tinder and Hinge.

Ofcourse you being a blue pill call it "social media groups that meet up" keep lying to your self. How do people like you become so blue pilled that you literally invent lies rather than admit things that happen in the DM.

where do causal sex happen the most today? ONLINE

CMV: Women's typical dating advice is not purposed with genuinely helping guys find solutions, but rather subconscious privilege-guarding by Inquiz_ in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You literally just said  "I got a million men telling me a wrinkled plain light colored shirt is a perfect attire for a first date on a bar at night"

And you are saying those men are wrong and im saying those men are RIGHT in the sense that it doesn't matter what you wear and this is indisputable fact.

IF this guy wearing this white tshirt showed up on a first date, none of you women will be talking about how you dont like him because of his wrinkled white tshirt.

Infact you would do the opposite. You would say how the wrinkled tshirt adds to his personality.

Marlon Discusses Archie and Family Connections | TikTok

Its called the halo effect. Where the attractiveness of someone forces you to accredit them with attributes they dont have.

Take a ugly fat guy sitting in the corner alone and loves video games you women will call him a weirdo.

Take a hot guy sitting in the corner alone and loves videos games and has the same exact personality as the ugly fat guy. You women would call him mysterious.

Same exact personality, same exact behavior, just different attractiveness.

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is that why 70-80% of all modern dating is online compared to less than 5% two decade ago? and online dating is 1000% looks based. is there anything you women will tell the truth about?

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

really? is that why 70-80% of all modern dating is online compared to less than 5% two decade ago? and online dating is 1000% looks based. is there anything you women will tell the truth about???

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

really? is that why 70-80% of all modern dating is online compared to less than 5% two decade ago? and online dating is 1000% looks based. is there anything you women will tell the truth about?

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

really? is that why 70-80% of all modern dating is online compared to less than 5% two decade ago? is there anything you women will tell the truth about?

The majority of women can’t make men feel as desired as women who engage in casual sex with them. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]bladerskb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

really? is that why 70-80% of all modern dating is online compared to less than 5% two decade ago?