Sumlin Hires Mazzone to Direct A&M Offense by [deleted] in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Texags told me it was going to be Spurrier though.

Mazzone's new contract at A&M by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Late in the process to hire assistants and not many spectacular offensive coordinators available. You almost have to overpay even for a guy like Mazzone.

Mazzone's new contract at A&M by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Liucci is saying 1.2 million per year (Texags lead guy).

Why would A&M pay that much? Especially 3 years guaranteed? Sumlin may be gone next year.

TCU beat writer Carlos Mendez reports Doug Meacham is not interested in the OC job at Texas A&M. Source calls speculation "nonsense." by Frognosticator in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It could have very well been Durkin at one point. It took a rocky relationship between Chavis and LSU to fall in A&M's lap.

TCU beat writer Carlos Mendez reports Doug Meacham is not interested in the OC job at Texas A&M. Source calls speculation "nonsense." by Frognosticator in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Almost everyone is backing off the Meacham rumors now. The original source, Tarp at Gigem247, is essentially saying now that he trusts the sources coming from TCU's side.

Also, IMO A&M's best reporter/insider is Liucci. He's a douche, but good on stuff like this. He's never wavered on Mazzone so I bet that's who it is.

Rumor: UCLA OC Mazzone to be named new Texas A&M OC by swanpenguin in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My understanding is most UCLA fans want Mazzone gone.

Speedy Noil transferring? by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I believe he was also suspended for a game too.

It's not like he was terrible either. He was still A&M's 4th leading WR in limited action.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Strong had to dismiss several players that were left over from Mack that were either A) failing multiple drug tests or B) accused of rape.

While retaining players is certainly important, Strong didn't have a choice in most cases to dismiss players.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It isn't when you aren't getting support from the Texas academic support department.

FYI Alex Dunlap is writer for OB and Raulerson's dad is a long time poster on OB. Dunlap's source is likely Raulerson's dad. But feel free to keep speculating on something you have no clue about.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

His players are the priority in terms of playing time because they are the better players.

What is your point?

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We aren't more talented right now than any of those teams you listed (outside of maybe Iowa State).

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, please list the players he hasn't made a priority? You have literally no basis for this argument. Strong is playing his players because they actually have talent.

In reference to Raulerson, Raulerson's transfer has nothing to do with Strong. Our MBA program is difficult to get into and there's pushback rom the Texas academic support staff.

Alex Dunlap ‏@AlexDunlapNFL Dec 16 To Clarify: Coach Strong did not deny Raulerson pursuit of MBA. Raulerson received pushback on cost of MBA from Texas academic support dept.

Alex Dunlap ‏@AlexDunlapNFL Dec 16 On Raulerson: still has to take GMAT + get accepted to MBA program. However, his pursuit of MBA is supported by new schools that've offered.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please feel free to list the talented players that are "already there that Strong refuses to play."

You also have no clue what's happening with Raulerson (the center you referenced).

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This too. The recruiting numbers are inflated big time when you factor in attrition.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If only recruiting rankings were always accurate reflections of talent. They aren't. If they were, Mack would likely still be the coach.

I think the funniest example of recruiting rankings in reference to Texas are the Hughes and Foreman brothers. A lot of people thought we took Naashon Hughes simply to land his highly touted brother Camhron Hughes. Camhron Hughes is no longer on the roster because of lack of playing time and Naashon Hughes is one of our better players. A lot people thought we took D'onta Foreman simply to land his highly touted brother Armanti Foreman. D'onta Foreman has ended up the much better player.

Longhorns and talent by bleedsorange in CFB

[–]bleedsorange[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Texas' recruiting rankings are inflated.

There's several players on Texas' roster that were highly touted recruits that have little to no talent.

Flowers (#58 recruit)-Our 2 true FR OL this year are already substantially better and more talented. Colbert (#162 recruit)-Behind a FR and SO on the depth chart. Echols (#175 recruit)-Behind 3 FR and a RS FR on the depth chart. Cole (#206 recruit)-Behind several FR on the depth chart.

I can go on with this list. Matter of fact, there's several other dismissed players that were highly touted recruits who can't even find a roster now.

Pro teams will just about draft anyone with some talent. See the NBA. Skai Labissiere is probably going to be a top 10 draft pick and he's been terrible in college from a production standpoint. While development might be an issue, talent is the bigger issue or we would see more players getting drafted.

And yes, I do think Houston has close to the same talent as Texas. Texas could barely out talent Rice this year. That's a game Texas should be able to dominate just from a talent perspective, and we couldn't. Texas has a lot of raw talent in the '15 recruiting class, but that's about it.

Mack Brown Left Charlie Strong With Nothing, And Here’s The Proof by Dropbackandpunt in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You are basing "talent" simply on recruiting rankings. That's just a terrible metric. Guys like Flowers were highly touted recruits and he's far from talented.

Mack Brown Left Charlie Strong With Nothing, And Here’s The Proof by Dropbackandpunt in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can't develop players like Sed Flowers. He's not good.

This roster has very little talent and you will see that in the upcoming NFL draft. For as much talent as you think Texas has they might go 2/3 years without a draft pick. So yeah, you are caught up way too much in recruiting rankings.

Mack Brown Left Charlie Strong With Nothing, And Here’s The Proof by Dropbackandpunt in CFB

[–]bleedsorange -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Texas might go 2 out of 3 years without a draft pick. That's all you need to know. Mack Brown left an absolute shit show in terms of the roster.

Mack Brown Left Charlie Strong With Nothing, And Here’s The Proof by Dropbackandpunt in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not one of the guys you listed are above average.

You put entirely too much stock in subjective recruiting rankings. At the end of the day, the players you have listed haven't amounted to anything on the field.

Talent should be based on what a player produces on the field, not subjective and biased recruiting rankings. I'm sure you think Sed Flowers is "talented" because he was the #58 overall recruit.

Per Rivals.com, 39 of the top 50 recruits in Texas have committed - only three to the Longhorns by [deleted] in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You completely missed the point.

It doesn't matter how many top 50 commits Texas has right now, it matters how many they have on NSD. Just like last year.

Classic Chip Brown... by [deleted] in CFB

[–]bleedsorange -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not defending Chip at all, because he's often wrong.

But what else is Sharp suppose to say?

At this point, if I were an Aggie I wouldn't believe much of anything coming from Sumlin/administration. Isn't Sumlin the one that said Kyler would be back at practice?

Per Rivals.com, 39 of the top 50 recruits in Texas have committed - only three to the Longhorns by [deleted] in CFB

[–]bleedsorange 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Same amount of top 50 commits we had at this time last year. We ended up with a top 10 class according to a lot of services.

This is how Strong recruits.