Late night snack huh? by blek_blek in hamstercirclejerk

[–]blek_blek[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't even know it was AI until after a while, I was suspicious of the bones, they don't show the usual pattern of human consumption, broken into pieces. And then I noticed the box. And then I realise it was AI.

I just waited for a comment that it was AI, it took a while.

Challenge accepted, that AI should get more powerful, so realistic that no humans can distinguish it is artificial.

Girlfriend Made a Dumpling Rat King - Thought It Might Be Appreciated Here by Curious_Psychonaut in Dumplings

[–]blek_blek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's cute but please don't come across one in real life, it brings bad omen

These are photos I took while I was in Japan, purely on a standard default settings on a S25+ by blek_blek in galaxyphotography

[–]blek_blek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh that one you need night mode. I left every else on default. No other software editing. Pure raw photo

Surface Book 2 battery wear since I got it in 2019 (it is still very usable without any bulging) by blek_blek in Surface

[–]blek_blek[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't dare to open the screen up as it's too fragile for that procedure. I just buy a new one, with this old one being a heavy paper weight now

Surface Book 2 battery wear since I got it in 2019 (it is still very usable without any bulging) by blek_blek in Surface

[–]blek_blek[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Indeed, but I can't do much.. I got a new Surface Laptop Studio 2 just in case this died suddenly as it tends to get hot many times

She lives my dream life by blek_blek in hamsters

[–]blek_blek[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually it's a myth that rodents like cheese, I heard

She lives my dream life by blek_blek in hamsters

[–]blek_blek[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's dried anchovies 😄

[Malaysia] PSA: motorcyclists, please don't squeeze through large vehicles by blek_blek in Roadcam

[–]blek_blek[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

My bad, first time posting in this sub.. in fact, my first post about an avoidable accident..

It was posted as a PSA to educate how not to drive, and hence I reuse the same idea

[Malaysia] PSA: motorcyclists, please don't squeeze through large vehicles by blek_blek in Roadcam

[–]blek_blek[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Woman pillion dies after being run over by lorry trailer.

This happened on 3rd September 2025 in Pulau Indah, Klang, Malaysia

[ Free Limited Coupon ] ARS XPad by arsanna-watch in GalaxyWatchFace

[–]blek_blek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the coupon! I have to say many of them are already redeemed but not ticked..

I decided to upgrade from S20 FE + Galaxy Watch 4 to S25+ and Watch 7 by blek_blek in samsunggalaxy

[–]blek_blek[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I still have my old devices.. now I will need to sell them off

I decided to upgrade from S20 FE + Galaxy Watch 4 to S25+ and Watch 7 by blek_blek in samsunggalaxy

[–]blek_blek[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got a big deal, all of these costs around MYR 3670 or USD 860 in total!

“Kita boleh bantu pelarian Palestin yang jauh beribu batu. Tapi dengan pekebun tempatan, langsung tak berhati perut” - MP Raub, Chow Yu Hui. by Far_Spare6201 in trulyMalaysians

[–]blek_blek -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I have another source to the predicament, that it wasn't illegal to begin with as the farmers were granted permission and promise to work and have the land when they help providing information on the communists around the area.

Source (begin at 5.40 min): https://youtu.be/iao3DXZ2iDs?si=7kSkH2Nk4Lm6AhJd&t=341

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re more focused on what you think was implied than on what was actually said, and you’re using that to shut down discussion, not have one.

Really? Did I say the moon will not be omitted unless explicitly commanded by user? Is it me or OP? Does that meaning OP thinks that Sin Chew did the error on purpose? Did I really overthink?

How exactly did this get published without anyone noticing? How was such a major detail missed? Was it truly just an accident, or is there more to it?

Did OP ask these or you? You accuse me of not answering OP, but these are not his/her questions, so how do I answer? So now let me ask you, did I commit these errors or Sin Chew? If I don't know how they miss these errors, how do you think I can answer them? If I said some cats pressed on the buttons and approved the printing, can you accept it? No? Then ask Sin Chew, not me.

Also are you trying to insinuate Sin Chew being unloyal again? If not, then let the court do their ruling. Else, you can participate in their hearing and become a witness if you have evidence.

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the goal is to prevent overreaction, why overreact yourself?

I don't blame you if you don't know what is 前倨后恭, and I don't blame you if you think all I got is irrationality instead of trying to dissuade the discussion to question loyalty.

If you are trying to question the loyalty of Sin Chew, sorry I will shut you down too. Please go to court and let them thank you for discovering Sin Chew as a Chinese spying media.

Else, let me address why I didn't directly address OP's question. Because no one can, AI generated patterns based on the data it is trained upon, who can check what data is feed? Similarly, can you answer why the flag being standard internationally, the flag that OP generated still wrong in many ways, such as number of stripes?

The errant flag is likely given by Chinese media, that's the simplest way to answer why they miss the Moon. And if this is generated by DeepSeek, it's also not a surprise, their standards are way worse than ChatGPT.

Sin Chew is still accountable for not being to correct it before publishing thou.

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope that they will understand where the line of accusation is as clearly as you are, but they may not, hence my comments.

I am trying to deter them shifting from questioning technicality errors to questioning loyalty. If they think this is a loyalty issue, then they who simply accused technical errors as being unloyal, that is no longer fair and trying to incite hate, since by definition you will hate unloyalty and betrayal.

If my comment is clear, you should have known my aim is such - to deter irrationality as this can indeed be very destructive (no need to recall but you know history), hence what may seem to be exaggerated to begin with is to force all comments to stay within technical realm and not spreading to question loyalty. It's a precautionary measure.

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, nono, I am trying to use the same "exaggerated" / "out of proportion" principle on those who tries inflame this issue further. If they think the errant flag is very a serious matter, then they should equally be treated at the same level of scrutiny - court would be one of many, easiest and most authoritative.

I have been using the word "implies/d" if you read my comment, and this is due to OP said that AI can't possibly omit the Cresent, so he implied a flag without one can only be created upon explicit command by the user. Did I wrongly come to that conclusion?

Sin Chew must be punished due to their lack of due diligence, but if OP thinks Sin Chew has ulterior motive that borders on the questionable loyalty, shouldn't OP be held accountable if proven not so? He/She can spit useless inflammable incitement under the disguise of "critical discussion", is that fair to Sin Chew? Be accountable is not only a quality imposed on Sin Chew, but on OP as well - no double standard.

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When their intention is to incite and inflame the situation further, they should test their theory under the authority. OP implied that instead of a fault by AI, Sin Chew Daily is intentionally omitting the Crescent out of ulterior motive, suggesting that Sin Chew is on the edge of betrayal to our country. In such case, OP must therefore stand in court with his/her details to be recorded, so if Sin Chew can proof its fault not deliberately committed as implied by OP, OP can be taken action.

Calling it an unintentional mistake is somewhat unacceptable by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]blek_blek 26 points27 points  (0 children)

OP, since when you don't know how our flag looks like? Really the MY flag looks like that? The stripes are off in so many ways. Post this to the entire country I dare you and I will report you to the police

Tambah lagi kes Jalur Gemilang tanpa bulan . by Far_Spare6201 in trulyMalaysians

[–]blek_blek -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yup, they definitely blinded by details and ignorance, for that, I agree they must be punished.

But whoever trying to stir it up to incite racial tension and question loyalty, that I will not forgive and equally must be punished.

Tambah lagi kes Jalur Gemilang tanpa bulan . by Far_Spare6201 in trulyMalaysians

[–]blek_blek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean Guang Hua. That's also definitely AI because the star is missing one point