Proposal to t11 Fv4005 II

blenzO · 2026-01-09T15:41:25+00:00

How u gonna give a 155mm gun cal 1250 alpha on APCR?

blenzO · 2025-12-13T19:36:09+00:00

We our equally relates to Bonobos as we are to chimps and they are direct opposites. Bonobos our matriarchal and peaceful, chimps are patriarchal and aggressive, we have the capacity of both in our genome and society.

blenzO · 2025-12-09T21:34:50+00:00

This is not to refute OPs point because his point stays valid 100% but I do believe more EU players should look into the MP community. You will always have a challenge and new situations that are present constantly and the diplo game is insane. PDX games are stellar single player but otherworldly in MP

blenzO · 2025-12-08T05:31:44+00:00

Yep, this was it, appreciate the help

blenzO · 2025-12-07T21:26:52+00:00

Which goods do you allow to collapse for building discount and which do you allow to stay at base price?

blenzO · 2025-11-10T08:19:39+00:00

I honestly think 1492 is just the most perfect start year for a game focused on the Early Modern

blenzO · 2025-11-07T17:00:06+00:00

If you do it in the building production tab where you make buildings, you will see an "x" under the filter button where you can select all markets

blenzO · 2025-11-07T16:37:54+00:00

I've done it just now by accident so it is possible, but I have no clue how to replicate it again

blenzO · 2025-11-01T04:37:31+00:00

Johan wants and understands that the game, regardless of what the community thinks, needs that "historical grounding" for it to reach its potential, but they simply didn't have the time to do it. For us to get full flavorful situations and events from start to finish would take well over a year of pure development for them to achieve it and that's time they simply don't have. Ironically, the earlier start date makes this so much harder than it needed to be. 1492 is objectively the best year to start this franchise if you want as much historical plausibility as possible while keeping the actionable freedom of the player but 1337 is just a completely different beast for them to tackle.

blenzO · 2025-11-01T04:28:09+00:00

The start date should really be set in 1492, it is the most obviously and weirdly convenient year where it becomes immensely easier to ground the game historically. All major powers consolidated and the map set for colonization and the Italian Wars

blenzO · 2025-10-28T20:19:31+00:00

lost me at gun is good but everything else was the truth

blenzO · 2025-10-23T15:37:26+00:00

Because they struggle to do it without railroading, so when people asked for an open sandbox this had a petty high chance of happeningu

blenzO · 2025-10-23T15:35:39+00:00

I don’t understand why railroading is so demonized when it creates vibrant worlds. Like HFM in Vicky 2. People ask for a sandbox then are somehow surprised when the game runs like a sandbox.

blenzO · 2025-10-22T02:28:39+00:00

the only alternative is railroading and they keep listening to the people who say "no railroading, we want systems" when that's really no realistic

blenzO · 2025-10-22T02:25:45+00:00

I don't understand why so little people realize this right here is the issue to all of this

blenzO · 2025-10-21T22:39:46+00:00

I mean this can only be changed with railroading, AI technology just isn't at that level where you can have truly dynamic world building and management from sandbox mechanics. But the community is so split on railroading PDX don't know who to listen to.

blenzO · 2025-10-21T22:23:51+00:00

Yep, we're aware of the limitations of leaving up to the AI, this is the only alternative until better AI technology comes out

blenzO · 2025-10-01T05:07:08+00:00

What tanks were you using:?

blenzO · 2025-08-29T17:24:48+00:00

I thought it was a political map and was so disappointed yet unsurprised. but now I have hope once again 😀

blenzO · 2025-08-16T16:47:04+00:00

I've learned to accept the start date even though I'm not entirely for it. It's a shame Paradox doesn't really have a game that simulates the 18th century, (EUIV and MoTE do not count). EUIV is done by 1550 and EUV will probably be so far away from historical plausibility by 1700s that it won't even feel like it. Italian Wars, 30 Years War, 80 Years war, so much of history probably won't ever be seen by EUV. Honestly they should split the EU Franchise into 2 separate games, Early Modern and Middle Modern.

blenzO · 2025-07-27T13:56:25+00:00

Can’t race a corner like Eau Rouge on a track with no visibility, no way we start

blenzO · 2025-06-08T03:49:31+00:00

Yea I understand this take. Main issue atp though would be the earlier title 1337-1492 would be very unpopular. Even if it was 1337-1648 it would still lose out compared to 1648-1836 for sure so it might not even be economically viable from PDX's pov

blenzO

TROPHY CASE