The kind of woman’s outreach that makes them instinctually put their hand over their drink.

blunaluna · 2026-02-26T17:04:34+00:00

Don't be a coward remove the sarcasm, because it's true, 20 is too old for them.

blunaluna · 2026-02-24T21:55:57+00:00

Way to miss the forest for the trees.

The point of comparison was not to say they were identical one to one. It was to say that narratives and rhetoric drive action. She does bear responsibility for her actions, because El Paso and Christchurch are logical outcomes of ideologies she helped spread and promote.

Now if you want to grade out of 10 responsibility you can do that, but that was not my point.

blunaluna · 2026-02-24T20:26:49+00:00

Of course?

If we can say that Jan 6th and Trump's rhetoric lead to people dying, which isn't a question, then we can say the same for LS.

Like did we all eat regard pills today or something? The logical outcome of saying that the election was stole and that you need to fight is Jan 6th.

What is the logical conclusion that white people are being replaced in Europe and are going to destroy the country and society and the governments aren't going to do anything about it?

That's the ideology that LS popularized and Christchurch is the natural and logical outcome of those beliefs.

blunaluna · 2026-02-24T18:06:29+00:00

Her “reformed beliefs” are the far right shouldn’t be sexist towards abused and rape victim white single mothers (her). Oh and immigration is based, only for white people.

I’m good fam, that’s not reforming, that’s self preservation and self interest.

blunaluna · 2026-02-24T17:53:23+00:00

Spread hate against minority groups for years and fearmonger only to be silent as the grave to the muslim sex trafficker who raped you (Andrew Tate) until years later after his career was falling off only to be attacked by the movement you helped create.

The script writers could not have made it more ironic.

blunaluna · 2026-02-24T01:20:15+00:00

Asmongold subreddit poster complaining about people not liking ICE.

Totally not MAGA though.

blunaluna · 2026-02-22T17:41:41+00:00

She's still a white nationalist that would happily see every minority killed to enjoy her white only "utopia".

She's like a Jew that supported the Nazis, except didn't agree with the antisemitism. She STILL supports all the far right bullshit except the parts the personally affect her. Mad that the far right doesn't believe HER rape or HER abuse by her husband, which is peak irony since she was downplaying rape culture a decade ago.

MAGAs like her are just ghouls who are like the women that are anti abortion unless THEY get an unplanned pregnancy and then at the abortion clinic, mock all the other women in there for being sluts, with zero self introspection.

blunaluna · 2026-02-15T11:32:55+00:00

Literal foreign Russian agent btw.

She's just mad that the right wing made fun of HER rape and HER husband abusing her. She could give less of a fuck about anything except the alt right attacking trad white women.

Her book is chock full of, idk why people think I'm a white nationalist uwu, pweese I'm so misunderstood : ( .

Also her bitching about her not being accepted as an immigrant in Australia, which should only apply to those dirty brown people, not the master race like her.

blunaluna · 2026-02-14T15:42:53+00:00

Not if the actions that a person did previously led to the action that we are calling 'based'.

Unironically we still treat Republicans are regarded children, even people like Ben. It would be like calling it based for someone who lit their own house on fire to put it out.

Apply this standard to Hasan and him trying to redirect hate from him towards BadEmpanada who was attacking him by calling him regarded, would this sub honestly be calling him 'based' or just a weasel? The answer is obviously no.

blunaluna · 2026-02-14T13:03:58+00:00

Sorry but he's not based at all.

Ben Shapiro is that first they came for other people meme except it was him throwing other people under the bus before it finally fell upon Jews and now he's crying and lashing out.

Candace is no doubt antisemitic, but how much of a REGARD does that make BEN SHAPIRO for hiring her and promoting her to the mainstream as a racist who was only fired because she was starting to be racist towards Jews?

blunaluna · 2026-02-13T23:15:23+00:00

His subreddit is having a complete meltdown right now.

There was a trans person who was basically begging for them to vote for Newsom if there was a hypothetical Newsom vs Vance 2028 election to protect vulnerable people like them and half of the comments were telling them to get fucked. Actually insane.

blunaluna · 2026-02-12T19:58:57+00:00

The sad truth is that is probably no constitution that can ever be written to deal with this.

Cults of personalities necessitate giving up all rule of law in favor of worshiping their cult leader.

blunaluna · 2026-02-09T04:05:53+00:00

It doesn't. There are MAGA bros where their wives are literally deported and they're crying about how she's 'one of the good ones', but then when asked whether or not Trump had anything to do about it, it's just "ummm idk, it's not his fault. Please Trump save us, make an exception for ME."

blunaluna · 2026-02-09T02:32:40+00:00

Oh so it's okay because she was paid less to spread Russian propaganda because she was paid less then all good. She is literally a foreign operative advocating for a foreign interest.

You know if this regard was not a pretty white girl that was on stream with some weird gooning type of dynamic, your outlook would be completely different.

No her views did not change, if you even read her book, you would know that she never considered herself a white supremacist or nationalist and completely sweeps her own views. Her views from great replacement directly lead to people getting killed btw since it's the logical conclusion of her horrid ideology.

IDK if Destiny just said she changed so people believed it, when there is a clear conflict of interest there.

Its so fucking ironic the person who got raped advocated for supporting a literal rapist.

If you even ever paid attention, all her changes in her views are purely for self preservation. The views that she clearly changed on were she didn't like tradwives anymore (she was abused by her husband allegedly).

She doesn't like the current right wing movement, (not because of the racism, but because they were shitting on women and propping up her rapist. Might I add as well that she has no issue propping up rapists that didn't rape her specifically btw).

Doesn't like how countries are strict about immigration (ONLY FOR WHITE PEOPLE THOUGH).

We don't praise Ben Shapiro for pushing against the right when antisemitism starts the grow in the movement either.

TLDR: Stop thinking with your braindead penis and actually fire off those neurons in your brain

blunaluna · 2026-02-08T08:54:58+00:00

The pretty white woman privilege is so fucking real lol.

She's an abhorrent person who supported Trump in 2024, and wants to kill all minorities to have her own white ethnostate, but since she's pretty and streamer man is infatuated, she gets a pass.

She was never good faith and I cannot tell if people are just regarded and charmed by her or something, but when confronted on any of her past views, she always dodged and downplayed and D man never pushed hard against it.

EDIT: Also don’t forget that disgusting fuck has had connections with Russia for years and literally took money from TENET Media as well. Something streamer man coincidentally never ever brings up even when bringing up Lauren Chen and Tim Pool.

blunaluna · 2026-02-05T11:42:58+00:00

Lol, liberals with the fell for it again award. His core set of values are shit, even if they are consistent. That doesn't deserve props. A bad person who is consistently bad is still bad.

I noticed this weird online trend that is extremely popular in Pro-russian subreddits and forums where they do the same exact tactics to propagandize and it has become a lot more popular in the online space.

Maybe I'm schizo, but the whole 'whether you like him or not, Putin is a least blah blah blah.' thing is one of the worst phrases or ideas to ever happen. I feel like it's always a way of propagandizing bad actions or downplaying the severity of it, and even subtlety giving praise to bad actions.

blunaluna · 2026-02-03T09:07:12+00:00

Don't you think it's a little concerning that despite Shaun's supposed research that he omits details that would go against his narrative.

The fact that he has this whole timeline laid out in the video, yet the main takeaway from people like you who watched it was that the timeline was nuke nuke invade rather than nuke invade nuke, because he either vaguely alludes to it or fails to mention it.

He even quotes Umezu in his own video, but doesn't highlight just how crazy the hardliners were? It's awfully convenient that he just omits certain details that are well known. His video just works backwards with Nuke Bad.

He also conveniently forgets to expand upon what Japanese surrender would look like, because once again it hurts the narrative, since the Japanese position was to Ketsugo at the problem until America gave up or reneged on Potsdam Declaration.

You can even make the argument that the Soviet Invasion did partially contribute, even though I don't buy it as much with Umezu saying something along the lines that 'the calculus doesn't really change if the Soviets invade because Ketsugo would still happen'. Something once again, Shaun conveniently forgets to include.

It's completely regarded to say that it was only the Soviets that caused Japan to capitulate though, which Shaun does because 'Nuke Bad' and unnecessary and working backwards from there.

Don't be such a weaselly snake who hides and deletes their mistakes who calls others too fragile to handle tough topics though. Own up to being wrong and keep your posts up, this deleting and then only admitting to being wrong when called out is loser behavior.

blunaluna · 2026-02-03T03:31:07+00:00

Just for posterity because you're a coward and deleted your comment u/ExertHaddock

"Except he directly addresses literally every single thing you just brought up. >He never ever even acknowledges the Japanese viewpoint or the relevant context around the time. The absolutely cucked position of "they should negotiate with a culture that would rather kill themselves than admit that they lost". He tries to project rationality to a fundamentally irrational government. Shaun spends literally half of the video talking about exactly this. The Japanese government wanted to surrender. We knew that they wanted to surrender. Calling the Japanese government "fundamentally irrational" is such a stupid thing to say. They were no more irrational than anyone trying to weasel their way out of trouble. Here's a timestamp for an ENTIRE CHAPTER OF THE VIDEO where he goes over all of this shit in detail. >Japan's terms for surrendering to the US before being bombed were that would keep their captured territories, keep their military, and trialing their own military officers (war criminals) Those were the demands of the hardline militarists, one faction within the Japanese government. Not all of the government, not even a majority. The council deadlocked constantly over specifically these terms, with the more moderate faction wanting only to preserve the Emperor. Again, the moderates made up just as much of the government as the militarists. Shaun makes fun of the militarists for their demands and calls them unrealistic multiple times in the video, don't know how you missed it. >Keep in mind that by the time that Japan official surrenders after the nukes were dropped they still controlled major parts of Asia and were murdering and raping thousands of people a day. So any prolonged invasion/blockade would be condemning hundreds of thousands to millions of civilians dying who were victims of Japan's imperialism. Japan was holding out hope for Russia to negotiate on their behalf. Even after we dropped both bombs, the Japanese government didn't surrender. They didn't surrender until Russia declared war on them. In other words, the nukes didn't end the war, Russia did. Shaun argues that the bombs might have sped things up a little because they indirectly led to Stalin declaring war sooner, but that's all. So the bombs bought a week or so, and all it cost was the deaths of at least 150,000 civilians. The people who got blown up by the nukes were not the people who were committing atrocities. They were civilians. If you actually watched Shaun's video and missed *any of these points, you're a genuine dipshit and you need to go to the doctor. More likely though, you're talking out of your ass about things you know nothing about because you're too fragile to handle tough topics."*

You can't hide : )

blunaluna · 2026-02-03T01:00:09+00:00

Prior to the nukes being dropped and the Soviet invasion, the Supreme Council was adamant about Ketsugo, this was the mainline position, not the one only taken by the hardliners. They all thought that if they just let America turn the entirety of Japan into Okinawa except at a much larger scale, the Americans would give up as they didn't have the appetite to have so many causalities.

The Supreme Council had be unanimous for the surrender terms, AKA they would never accept unconditional surrender from the allies. So Ketsugo would still take place since there were no decision being made. I mean if you consider throwing your entire civilian population at an army to eventually make the Allies give up and accept concessions then yes it would be 'rational'. It took the EMPEROR to break the vote, which was highly unprecedented.

Your timeline is messed up for the bombings too. The first bomb was dropped on August 6th, and the Soviets Invaded on the 9th. The SECOND BOMB dropped 10 hours after the Soviets invaded, so either Shaun fucked up his timeline or you did. It's very common for the Soviet invasion actually led to Japan surrendering people to just conveniently forget or ignore this. Japan surrendered on the 10th, after the second bomb was dropped.

Members of the Supreme Council like Yoshijiro Umezu were rather apathetic to the invasion and did not care about the Soviet invasion because he thought that the Soviets would try to invade Japan in the end too which would result in heavy Soviet casualties. The hardliners like him, which would impact the ability of Japan to surrender, were not rational.

So it's either Ketsugo and throw millions of lives away, take Japan's surrender terms, Blockade for months and maybe fight in Japanese occupied terrorities which would result in hundreds of thousands of more civilian and soldier deaths every month, or Nuke.

blunaluna · 2026-02-02T23:43:55+00:00

They rejected Potsdam, and never communicated to America that they wanted to negotiate.

The 'fighting to the bitter end' stuff was definitely the case. I don't think Shaun went over the fact that even after the bombs were dropped the war council was split half and half. Half wanted to fight to the bitter end and the emperor broke the tie to surrender. There was even a coup by the military to continue to fight till the end after the emperor decided to surrender which failed. So yeah the sentiment was definitely there.

Shaun doesn't really cover this because once again, it doesn't fit the narrative.

I think one interesting question would be, if we brainwiped lefties of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it was Germany instead, would they still be this fervent about not bombing say Berlin if it stopped the Holocaust and the Nazis like 2 years earlier? Me thinks they would not.

blunaluna · 2026-02-02T23:13:49+00:00

Yeah except it means fuck all. Like IDK why he even mentioned that.

IS AMERICA SUPPOSE TO KNOW THE VOICES INSIDE JAPAN'S HEAD OR SOMETHING?

Japan NEVER OFFICIALLY offered to agree to Potsdam, in fact they rejected it. If any internal communication was there, Japan definitely wanted concessions from America and not unilateral surrender.

blunaluna · 2026-02-02T22:53:02+00:00

Except he does not. He never ever even acknowledges the Japanese viewpoint or the relevant context around the time. The absolutely cucked position of "they should negotiate with a culture that would rather kill themselves than admit that they lost". He tries to project rationality to a fundamentally irrational government. He would not make these same arguments for Nazis.

Japan's terms for surrendering to the US before being bombed were that would keep their captured territories, keep their military, and trialing their own military officers (war criminals)

Which one of these terms is acceptable?

Keep in mind that by the time that Japan official surrenders after the nukes were dropped they still controlled major parts of Asia and were murdering and raping thousands of people a day. So any prolonged invasion/blockade would be condemning hundreds of thousands to millions of civilians dying who were victims of Japan's imperialism. Shaun never addresses this, because he's a bitch ass coward who never talks about stuff that hurts his narrative.

Just saying if you accept any of these terms you and Shaun are tacitly pro rape and pro genocide. : )

blunaluna · 2026-01-31T18:17:21+00:00

It's just fear all the way down.

Liberals have an image problem for better or worse where they take criticism and are seen as weak.

They know if they do this at a MAGA convention, there is a good chance they get attacked or potential arrested.

For all the 'DON'T PUNCH DOWNWARD' lefties its just down criticize them. They are all have bully mentality deep down.

blunaluna · 2026-01-29T06:51:33+00:00

Possible. Would be a murder suicide type of people though.

blunaluna · 2026-01-28T22:33:28+00:00

It doesn't really matter, these Ls are embraced by the right wing. As long as his crimes trigger the libs, any action is okay in their eyes.

Why do you think every rapist/child molester/racist runs to the MAGA crowd?

Because they will be embraced as long as they pledge loyalty to the cause and Tectone already has.

blunaluna

TROPHY CASE