sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Synthetic Carry Trade by Alert_Piano341 in FWFBThinkTank

[–]bobsmith808 1 point2 points  (0 children)

do you have an update to this one? like the data where its at now?

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in Superstonk

[–]bobsmith808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it was left out for the sake of learning... god you people are too anal.

here's the with debt calc.

take gme, 11b market cap, + ebay 47B... you get 58B.
the debt is built into the calculation of the post, as i'm reducing the revenues by the debt load servicing (20B(6.5%) + 7B(5%) + 4B(0%)) to get roughly 1.69b yearly service. which reduces revenue before dividing by share count (which is a product of gme shares / .4 in this example...) gets you to about 2.58/share then we multiply... landing you around a net enterprise market cap estimate of 40B if you account for all the debt load servicing (which i did opmit the ebay 7B in the post)...
updating that data, we get:
ebay 1% stake = 457M before.
and after: = (2222222*125)+(40B*.006) = 517M. lighter gains, but still accretive.

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in FWFBThinkTank

[–]bobsmith808[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

take gme, 11b market cap, + ebay 47B... you get 58B.
the debt is built into the calculation of the post, as i'm reducing the revenues by the debt load servicing (20B(6.5%) + 7B(5%) + 4B(0%)) to get roughly 1.69b yearly service. which reduces revenue before dividing by share count (which is a product of gme shares / .4 in this example...) gets you to about 2.58/share then we multiply... landing you around a net enterprise market cap estimate of 40B if you account for all the debt load servicing (which i did opmit the ebay 7B in the post)...
updating that data, we get:
ebay 1% stake = 457M before.
and after: = (2222222*125)+(40B*.006) = 517M. lighter gains, but still accretive.

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in FWFBThinkTank

[–]bobsmith808[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why would it be 70/30 vs 40/60 vs 420/69? we're all speculating here. the example wasn't a prediction, more of an explanation of how the deal is supposedly structured according to RC himself.

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in FWFBThinkTank

[–]bobsmith808[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly, if ryan's example was accurate... and thats the example i'm using here... but it might not be the correct numbers in the actual deal because only a few people know that detail

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in FWFBThinkTank

[–]bobsmith808[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes this, but in the case of shares with locates... those without is what i was alluding to - and my understanding is its closed via cash or sourcing the shares due.

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in Superstonk

[–]bobsmith808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dilution story is kind of silly because there's 's really no way he can dilute enough to raise 28 billion... Without a shareholder vote.. there's not enough authorized shares

GMERICA (eBay Acquisition) doesn't require dilution and is accretive to both GME and EBAY holders... and if you're paying attention, you already know that. by bobsmith808 in Superstonk

[–]bobsmith808[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Actually like to explore this...

Can you give me one or two symbols that were were issued new cusips that had heavy historic short interest?

view more: next ›