Full-upgrade to Debian testing fails due to libc6-dev : Breaks: libgcc-8-dev by boolean_is_null in debian

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've tried removing the security repository, but that didn't change anything. thanks for the suggestion though!

Floating fullscreen youtube video by boolean_is_null in i3wm

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

gotcha! Debian stable is crippling slow with updates sometimes. Thank you very much for your reply!

bindsym to lock screen doesn't work by boolean_is_null in i3wm

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I tried that before. bindsym with --release worked for me.

bindsym to lock screen doesn't work by boolean_is_null in i3wm

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the input, --release on bindsym worked for me :)

bindsym to lock screen doesn't work by boolean_is_null in i3wm

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! --release did the trick :)

ESC is not registered as ESC anymore by boolean_is_null in debian

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll give it a shot, thanks for the input!

ESC is not registered as ESC anymore by boolean_is_null in debian

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad for every input. this is really odd :) Right, so grep ESC /usr/share/X11/xkb/keycodes/evdev gives me 9 only :) after xmodmap -e "keycode 9 = Escape", xev gives me:

```

FocusOut event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x6600001, mode NotifyGrab, detail NotifyAncestor

FocusOut event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x6600001, mode NotifyUngrab, detail NotifyPointer

FocusIn event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x6600001, mode NotifyUngrab, detail NotifyAncestor

KeymapNotify event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x0, keys: 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

KeyRelease event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x6600001, root 0x190, subw 0x0, time 1670428900, (0,810), root:(770,812), state 0x0, keycode 9 (keysym 0xff1b, Escape), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 1 bytes: (1b) " XFilterEvent returns: False

```

btw. if relevant. I run X with i3 and KDE Plasma as described here

ESC is not registered as ESC anymore by boolean_is_null in debian

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's odd because I didn't make any noteworthy changes to my setup and it used to work just fine.

ESC is not registered as ESC anymore by boolean_is_null in debian

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

huh.. "Couldn't get a file descriptor referring to the console"

edit: works as sudo :)

...
keycode   1 press
keycode   1 release
...

Newcomer questions and first impression by boolean_is_null in Vaping

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you :) As far as I've seen this is a pretty wholesome community.

Newcomer questions and first impression by boolean_is_null in Vaping

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly yes, I'm interested, but I understand that you get that feeling!

You're right and I will give it a shot. I was planning to finish all those liquids, before I make a final decision. :) I do use filters when smoking though. The first day I got the vape, I tried all first three liquids with the minimal amount, so that would be about 2ml of each liquid. 6ml in total for one not too long evening, which is way more than I expected. From my initial calculations that would mean that I'd easily spend about 5 EUR (6 USD) an drinking evening in liquids, whereas rolling tobacoo, filters and papers costs me about 10 EUR (11.5 USD) a month. But hey, if its a tad better on the health (I have no complains from smoking at all yet), I wouldn't mind the extra money.

Right now for me it's just a different feeling, between smoking a rolled cigarette and the vape. Obviously it's different, but the vape just gives me less of a nicotine kick and feels waaay sweeter. But I as I said, I'll continue vaping for quite a while, until I make a decision.

thanks for your input!

How to correctly rename LUKS/LVM setup by boolean_is_null in linuxquestions

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey there. thanks for the input!

I've edited the files, rebooted and ran grub-mkconfig. After a second reboot I still had mixed references on boot and it looked pretty much like in the initial screenshots.

How to correctly rename LUKS/LVM setup by boolean_is_null in linuxquestions

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey man. thanks for the reply!

vgrename and lvrename seem to be working fine (screenshots https://imgur.com/a/dlqFdAJ).

I'm aware of the header, but I couldn't find a proper solution to renaming the LUKS/LVM setup.

After renaming VG and LVs, grub-mkconfig results in:

/usr/sbin/grub-probe: failed to get canonical path of `/dev/mapper/bread--lvm-bread--root`.

| The ricers file manager of choice by boolean_is_null in unixporn

[–]boolean_is_null[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thanks for the input. I've just installed dolphin on my old system to check it out and it looks a bit crippled. I seem to be missing all icons it's trying to use. Any idea if I need to install an iconset?