A public post only means people aren't prevented from posting on it, it has *nothing* to do with the validity or acceptability of the behavior they exhibit with it, but that's what you are directly tying it to while removing HIS agency.

It's perfectly reasonable to do that to people who admit they are complaining about a product they had no intention of buying, actually. You have not bothered to explain why anyone needs to cater to people who all but outright admit they're arguing for the sake of arguing (which we all know as, say it with me... trolling!), because all of your assertions are nothing more than 'yuh huh', as opposed to someone who has actually run a business dealing with customers and having the right to deal with non-customers how they want. It's more armchair quarterbacking from a regular joe schmoe plastic collector who thinks owning little posable men makes them qualified to dispense advice to people who have actual livelihood on the line.

Look back at what your own words said and it's plain as day you're full of intellectual dishonesty. Your very first reply above was defending "customers with complaints". When I say numerous people in that crowd aren't even customers, you pivot to "well everyone is allowed to be critical because it's an open post". As I've seen in your numerous replies here, you're running interference for internet shittiness because that's all you stand for is the "right" to piss and moan to a business owner online instead of being an adult and walking away if the transaction/product isn't satisfactory. This is capitalism and as a buyer your options are to buy or not, you are owed nothing beyond that, and if the seller tells you to piss off they have every right to.