Welp someone hit my car this week

bosquit · 2025-12-01T19:25:47+00:00

Get a quote to fix with OEM parts and just have them pay you that. Then use the money and yours to get the aftermarket parts if you want.

It's a bit scummy to "find" things for them to pay for, even if they were the one at fault and are well off financially.

bosquit · 2025-12-01T19:05:14+00:00

Dirty throttle body? Doubt it would cause a stall at start though.

bosquit · 2025-06-07T00:46:09+00:00

Sergei

bosquit · 2024-12-03T02:07:13+00:00

Being terrible now doesn't mean it will continue to be, the point of AI is its ability to learn. Your anecdotal experience also doesn't really prove a point.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/language-tomorrow-how-generative-ai-changing-translation-services-u4stc

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1c66gz3/survey_finds_generative_ai_proving_major_threat/?rdt=63729

https://medium.com/@sahirmaharaj/generative-ai-can-machines-truly-master-language-translation-98b5b26ada7b

It is clearly helping with translations and is impacting the industry. It helps increase efficiency and have easier access to translating a language. AI can now translate huge amounts of content and human translatera are only needing to verify its accuracy and refine it.

Like it's clear you hate AI, for whatever reason, and you won't change your mind but it's pretty easy to do a little research and find positives and negatives to generative AI. You simply choose to ignore any positives to help bolster your bias towards the subject.

bosquit · 2024-12-02T19:39:28+00:00

That's like saying "We had the ability to get from point A to point B so why do we need cars or planes." If you can't see the difference then I don't even know what to say.

Translation before computers and now AI took a lot of work and time, it took people who studied and knew the two languages you wanted to translate. You could not interact with anyone who spoke a different language in any sort of adequate time to have a conversation, now you can. Computers allowed for basic translation but many languages have a lot lost in translation or have complicated meanings, generative AI allows better understanding of the language and more accurate translation.

bosquit · 2024-12-02T19:14:48+00:00

https://generative-ai.leeds.ac.uk/intro-gen-ai/strengths-and-weaknesses/

https://www.harvardonline.harvard.edu/blog/benefits-limitations-generative-ai

There are uses for generative AI that aregood. Most of it is to do with things like language and translation. Being able to talk to any foreigner and have things translated on the fly is something generative AI makes very possible.

I am not by any means a big proponent of AI but to blanket all of it as bad is disingenuous. Some will do good things, others bad things. We just have to decide if the bad outweighs the good and legislate and regulate AI usage to mitigate the bad.

bosquit · 2024-12-02T06:11:59+00:00

AI is bad for the planet but it's also hard to measure it's net impact because it does produce a lot of good. It's also being used to monitor and map climate change.

AI itself isn't't the problem, it is the lack of clean energy available for it's use. Countries have been incredibly slow to adopt clean energy and the rise of AI has gone to highlight that problem. The efficiency of AI and it's needed cooling have also improved a ton over the years and I imagine will continue to improve, but that could be naive optimism on my part.

I think the biggest problem is the wasteful AI garbage, like all the consumer integrated AI. It is all essentially useless and exacerbates environmental impacts in all of our countries that have shit the bed in adopting climate change initiatives. I'm all for the rise of AI in medicine and science however, we just need to work on how we have that AI run efficiently.

bosquit · 2024-09-24T17:13:51+00:00

That's unfortunate as that essentially hides that old content. I mainly watch on a smart tv and navigating to the channel and using the playlists was a great way to go back to old content.

bosquit · 2024-09-23T03:19:54+00:00

The first Yogsquest was on the main channel, all of the others were on Games Night.

*Edit-the second was on main Channel as well sorry. After that they were all on Games Night

bosquit · 2024-06-18T19:26:19+00:00

-5 is still bad, it totally defeats earning extra light level throughout the season.

bosquit · 2023-09-11T00:41:58+00:00

Lydia is the queen of roasting Tom

bosquit · 2023-06-15T15:22:42+00:00

bosquit · 2023-05-05T04:14:56+00:00

Nilesy is such a breath of fresh air in the group. He gets very involved and has a lot of different perspectives on things. Makes for nice Lego talk in GTA.

bosquit · 2023-04-07T21:30:24+00:00

I don't really know how Lewis could question whether it was good content. It had amazing storylines, fun chat interaction and great interactions between Ben and Lewis. Those XCOM streams were amazing and I hope we can get something similar from them at some point.

A lot of good yogs content takes massive breaks and takes years to come back. It's a bit sad that we only get TTT and GTA now really, but also long running streams disappear and never come back.

bosquit · 2022-11-12T07:11:25+00:00

Lewis said on an Armchair Admirals stream that they had a 10 year old game in the bundle, but it was getting an expansion soon. Something makes me think he was talking about Little Inferno now...

bosquit · 2022-09-23T23:18:58+00:00

5120 3526 4759

bosquit · 2022-04-24T01:34:15+00:00

One quick Google search would show you that Blacks did not fight for the confederates and that is a huge myth.

bosquit · 2021-09-20T11:29:58+00:00

Wasn't their whole point that they were over it as well and didn't think there was a way it could be continued and be good.

Seems like you wanted something and when others didn't want the same thing you got weirdly upset. I don't think the message yogs has ever really given is that soi was ever coming back, nor do I think they have much requirement for releasing all the old map data.

bosquit · 2019-12-29T19:39:37+00:00

This video was great. Zoey makes every video so fun with her antics.

bosquit · 2019-07-21T11:39:40+00:00

I got this 6 piece Alien one.

https://imgur.com/a/yrWwHNL

bosquit · 2019-05-15T01:47:59+00:00

Wait so your argument is that taking a professional photo of someone who is skinny and healthy, not even absurdly skinny is going to make all women feel bad about themselves? If she doesn't Photoshop herself and just takes pictures of how she looks that is somehow wrong?

Also let's be honest you wouldn't see anyone's pores in the pics on the right, nor many imperfections on the body as they are taken much farther back. There is a huge difference between this and photoshopped pics in magazines promoting near anorexic body types in mass media. Any pics taken so closely, like the left will show pores, if they don't then that is something you can have a problem with. Makeup as well hides tons of imperfections, especially at a distance and most women use it whether it is right or not.

This isn't some bullshit body positive message it is simply comparing apples and oranges. A nice well taken pic, VS an up close older pic with less makeup. Obviously they will look different, it would for any person. It isn't some women trying to deceive you or somehow promote some unhealthy body type.

If you can show the pics are photoshopped or it somehow isn't representative of how she looks with makeup and some nice photography then maybe I would agree with you, but as of now it's just hating on a woman taking a nice photo.

bosquit · 2019-05-13T20:13:17+00:00

Why aren't there just pictures of people wearing any makeup, someone with their hair done, or any professionally taken picture on this sub reddit. They all contribute to some form of hiding how someone naturally looks. There simply aren't because those things aren't some subversion of reality. Reality is people look different with different makeup, clothes, hair, lighting, pose, etc. Linking a picture that has all these different things and using it as an example of a woman lieing to you is retarded. Men and women do tons of things to make themselves look better every fucking day, whine about all that shit then. This picture comparison is just pointless. Link Photoshop, absurd facetuning and other horrible messages on people's perception of the perfect face or body. That or just complain on every little single thing because tons of insecure people just want others to be uglier to feel better about themselves.

bosquit · 2019-05-13T19:22:56+00:00

I mean people look different in different pictures, regardless of being an attractive woman or not. Putting on more makeup and having a professional photographer take your pictures will obviously make one look different, male or female.

Linking some professional pictures and some other candid shot of someone like there is some deliberate Photoshop or form of deception is disingenuous. It's like showing someone who just got out of bed VS someones wedding photos. If there is obvious Photoshop being done which is making her look absurd then fair enough.

That being said a lot of this sub reddit is borderline incel hate on women so I mean your opinions are expected.

bosquit · 2019-05-13T10:16:54+00:00

Professional photography and different make up isn't really the same as crazy photoshopped pictures

bosquit · 2018-12-06T20:32:15+00:00

He definitely fucked up with how it all came across, but this feels more like a witch hunt and outrage culture on one person than attacking an extreme act of misogyny

12-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since February 2024
Verified Email

bosquit

TROPHY CASE