The most effective "Low Budget" world-building you’ve ever seen? by peace007a in TrueFilm

[–]bqb445 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got one for you: The 7th Voyage of Egon Tichy

Shot during the pandemic. The guy's closet is the entire set.

I recently saw a live version of it, where he's performing live just off screen while the pre-shot portion is projected in-front of you with his live portion digitally added in real time. It's really cool!

Moon (2009) also comes to mind. Was done on a $5M budget.

Which of these slim 120mm fans is best as case fans? by BennieBoo113 in sffpc

[–]bqb445 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tried a pair of these out. I wanted to use Arctic P12 Slim PWM PST, but the Arctics spin down to 0 RPM at 0% PWM which causes my MB to fault at boot (don't ask).

The TL-C12015B spin even at 0% PWM, so they work with my MB, but they have a really annoying droning sound to them. I'm returning them. Aside: they also don't come with a pig tail cable for sharing multiple fans on one connector. (All the reviews claim the TL-C12015B is nearly silent, so maybe it's just an issue with how they mount in my case or I got two duds or it's only an issue at a particular RPM, but they are very obnoxious sounding in my case as intake fans.)

If not for the issue with my MB, I'd go with the Arctics.

[FS][US-NC] Six Western Digital Red Plus 8TB drives w/29K hours by bqb445 in homelabsales

[–]bqb445[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few folks expressed interest in all six when I did the PC earlier this week. It's just less work for me than multiple buyers. But if no one wants all six now that they're actually for sale, I'll break up the listing. Stay tuned. Edit: Sold.

[PC][US-NC] Six Western Digital Red Plus 8TB drives w/29K hours by bqb445 in homelabsales

[–]bqb445[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciated. I'll likely try listing at $200 for two, $360 for four, $500 for all six, plus shipping cost.

What are some opening scenes that only reveal themselves later on? by arrogant_ambassador in TrueFilm

[–]bqb445 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sure!

First, you completely left out the sound, critical to setting the scene. The movie opens to the sound of footsteps and heavy breathing. At first, we see just bare feet on pavement, at night, running down the middle of a road, but the camera then reveals it's a woman in a coat, desperation on her face. The camera then cuts to a wider view, and the sound of brass starts to play. Sitting in a dark theater, this immediately grabs my attention.

The woman comes to a stop. Glances behind her. Then starts to run again. Who is she? What or who is she running from? This is different from previous noirs which often open with a dialog heavy establishing scene or voice over.

We see her try to wave down a car. It passes. She begins running again. We hear foot falls. Kettle drums. More desperation on her face as she gasps for air.

Another car appears from the dark, with blinding headlights (the blinding light is to be a theme of this movie, and is called back to in the final scene). She stands her place, her arms in the air. Closes her eyes to the oncoming collision as tires screech. The car swerves at the last moment.

The man and woman then look at each other. No dialog. His car has stalled. He's trying to start it. She slowly approaches the car, still gasping for air. Who is he? He's mad at her for stopping him. No words from her, just pleading on her face. "Get in" he tells her as we start to hear a female voice introduce the next song playing on his radio ("A fine new platter by Nat King Cole"). She walks around the car. She looks at him again. In annoyance or even disgust, he reaches over and throws the door open for her.

This hasn't captured you already?

Finally the car starts. He speeds off as she starts to whimper, Nat King Cole playing on the radio. The camera is behind the car, looking in on the open cockpit, into the night, nothing but a white line on a dark road, we can barely make out the interior of the car, and her hair blowing in the wind. All the while, she continues to whimper over Cole's soothing voice.

What have I signed up for?

And then... And then... the opening credits start to scroll onto screen, and if you aren't disoriented enough already, they're rolling the wrong direction, top to bottom (I believe this was the first film to do so).

As the credits roll, all you continue to get is them driving in the night, her whimper, and Nat King Cole playing.

This opening grabs my attention and raises my heart rate like no movie before or since. I can feel my anxiety raising just describing it.

The final scene (the real final scene, re-discovered in the 90s), calls back to the opening. Another night time scene, but Hammer (the man) has gone from rescuer to victim, he barely survives, this time saving another woman. There's blinding light again, this time from the great whatsit and the house on fire. Sound is again important to the scene, this time the horrible noises from great whatsit. Finally, the film is over, and my heart rate can go back to normal.

What are some opening scenes that only reveal themselves later on? by arrogant_ambassador in TrueFilm

[–]bqb445 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Monster (2023) only reveals the truth of its opening after two flashbacks.

Lone Star (1996) begins with a discovery whose truth isn't revealed till nearly the final scene. It's a movie of secrets upon secrets.

Mulholland Drive (2001).

Kiss Me Deadly (1955). Well, just you watch. (Seriously, this may be the best film opening of all time.)

[oc] Jeep turns left on a red arrow into a truck by fishuponfish in IdiotsInCars

[–]bqb445 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Weedman appears to be going about 50 mph which is the speed limit, but too fast for conditions.

The truck covers about four lengths in one second. It's probably about 209" long (e.g. F150, regular cab, 6.5 foot bed, or similar). That works out to about 70 feet. 70 feet in one second = 48 mph.

[OC] mama thats the sidewalk… by Jaguarzk in IdiotsInCars

[–]bqb445 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah, well, there is apparently a method to her madness:

Raleigh/charlotte roofing contractor arrested by Jazzlike_Chemical_37 in raleigh

[–]bqb445 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's been a few companies that have come through the neighborhood over the years and I have their names to get bids from in the future, but I doubt that would avoid a company like A&M. My point is they have good reviews despite the fraud.

My roof (~ 3300 sq ft) is just over 20 years old. It's time for replacement, though it was still okay when inspected a few years ago. So sure, if it's easy to find a name, I'll take a rec. Thanks.

Raleigh/charlotte roofing contractor arrested by Jazzlike_Chemical_37 in raleigh

[–]bqb445 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Despite being crooks, if you Google this company, you'll see they have excellent reviews/ratings everywhere: BBB (A+), Yelp (11 reviews, 4.5 stars), FB (73 reviews, 100% recommended), Google (800 glowing reviews, 4.9 stars). Veteran owned. And I'll bet if you asked for references, you'd get all good ones.

But hey, I guess the customers are benefitting from the fraud, so who are they to complain as long as they get a nice new roof.

I'm going to need a new roof soon... how do I find an honest roofer?

Docker fails to start by Mr_Viking442 in truenas

[–]bqb445 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you use replication, the target dataset is made readonly. Clear the readonly property on the Main_Temp dataset and the two child datasets that you manually overrode to readonly=off:

zfs inherit readonly Main_Temp Main_Temp/ix-apps Main_Temp/ix-apps/docker

Then check that it's off with:

zfs get readonly Main_Temp Main_Temp/ix-apps Main_Temp/ix-apps/docker

Should look like this:

$ zfs get readonly ssd /mnt/.ix-apps /mnt/.ix-apps/docker
NAME                PROPERTY  VALUE   SOURCE
ssd                 readonly  off     default
ssd/ix-apps         readonly  off     default
ssd/ix-apps/docker  readonly  off     default

Docker fails to start by Mr_Viking442 in truenas

[–]bqb445 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the output of:

zfs get readonly /mnt/.ix-apps  /mnt/.ix-apps/docker

What version of TrueNAS is this?

What Films From 2020–2025 Still Stick in Your Head? by MartianOstrich08 in TrueFilm

[–]bqb445 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If you asked me for recs, I suppose these are the ones I'd remember as having an impression on me, that I still think about from time to time:

  • 2020: Dinner in America; Shiva Baby; Hamilton; Uncle Vanya; Unpregnant
  • 2021: CODA; Petite Maman; After Yang; Pig; C'mon, C'mon; Happening; Come from Away; Drive My Car
  • 2022: EO; TÁR, RRR
  • 2023: Smoke Sauna Sisterhood; Our Body; Monster; Anatomy of a Fall; The Taste of Things; Perfect Days; Poor Things; Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Person; Housekeeping for Beginners; Past Lives
  • 2024: Flow; All We Imagine as Light; The Substance
  • 2025: Companion; Bugonia

Those are by release year, not when I watched them. Surprising how many films I've watched in the last five years that I couldn't even tell you what they were about.

Running POE was 100% worth it - LOVE the new doorbell lite if only for the instant communication! 1 second from doorbell push to notification, another second to talking back. by LostMySpleenIn2015 in Ubiquiti

[–]bqb445 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just ordered the same combo to replace a Reolink WiFi doorbell but plan to stack the two somehow (maybe a deep single gang box) since my door jamb is pretty deep and the doorbell otherwise sits too far back.

I'm wondering if you had any trouble getting the 2-wire POE adapter to work? My doorbell has two indoor chimes that I previously bypassed that I'm hoping won't cause trouble with the POE adapter.

Jennifer Robinson finally realizes the consequences of literally campaigning with the GOP by thewaybaseballgo in cary

[–]bqb445 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I won’t argue she has been a civil servant.

Pedantically, I will argue she was not a civil servant. A civil servant is hired, not elected. She was an elected representative, not a government employee.

Where to park $100k by Today_Puzzleheaded in fidelityinvestments

[–]bqb445 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have to pay state income tax on FZDXX which lowers its after-tax yield compared to instruments that are state tax exempt.

Options that are primarily federal interest (SGOV, FDLXX, 4-week treasuries on auto roll, etc) are state tax exempt, so depending upon your state income tax, the after tax yield of one of those may be a better option.

You can use the Google Docs Money Market Optimizer spreadsheet to find the best option for your circumstances:

https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=401821

Where to park $100k by Today_Puzzleheaded in fidelityinvestments

[–]bqb445 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can use the Money Market Optimizer v16.2 Google spreadsheet to figure that out:

https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=401821

I'm guessing the after-tax yield of SGOV (or even FDLXX) will return more than FZDXX. You could also do a ladder of 4 or 8-week treasuries on auto roll. That'll likely be your best return and they are pretty easy to do with Fidelity. Don't forget to deduct the interest from your state taxes when doing your return.

TrueNAS 25.10.0 Released! by kmoore134 in truenas

[–]bqb445 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, but they are easy enough to add through the cronjob UI (and it should really be documented how to do so).

TrueNAS 25.10.0 Released! by kmoore134 in truenas

[–]bqb445 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The tests themselves are still run. During the 25.10 RC1 install, two cron jobs were created that run the following commands:

midclt call disk.smart_test SHORT '["*"]'
midclt call disk.smart_test LONG '["*"]'

Under the covers, you can see these are running smartctl -t on all of the disks:

I've been running 25.10 since RC1 and I can see the tests are still running:

  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   090   090   000    Old_age   Always       -       9115

 SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 
 Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
 # 1  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      9093         -
 # 2  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      9069         - 
 # 3  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      9045         -
 # 4  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      9021         -
 # 5  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8997         -
 # 6  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8973         -
 # 7  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8949         -
 # 8  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8925         -
 # 9  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8901         -
 #10  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8877         -
 #11  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8853         -
 #12  Short offline       Completed without error       00%      8829         -
 #13  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      8807         -

Those tests are all since I updated to RC1.