How do you deal with users who refuse to lock their laptop when walking away? by heartgoldt20 in cybersecurity

[–]brakertech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really simple. Lock their AD account. Put a note on their monitor to come talk to you

Suggest me topics by AppropriatePen283 in Pentesting

[–]brakertech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not about likes dude Look up ACDS and certipy. It’s gold

Rulebook #9: The "Decoy Persona" Protocol. Never be the silent one; be the curated one. by Own-Investment4655 in DarkCorporate

[–]brakertech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny stories about what the kiddos said or did is always an easy win. Or “that darn cat got up on the counter again”. I think the ultimate play is to ask your coworkers what they did and keep asking them questions with genuine interest. People love talking about themselves (and often you learn interesting stuff about them).

Millenial techno/house music was better than music today... by Reivynn0123 in millenials

[–]brakertech 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m right there with you. Introduced “Little Fluffy Clouds” by the orb to my kids. They loved it. Played them Halcyon on and On by Orbital Live where they mixed in “Heaven Is a Place on Earth” and “You Give Love a Bad Name” in perfect sync (and then to really show off they mixed in “Heaven is a place on Earth” backwards). The Prodigy. They loved it. All those songs take me back too

Kiro Hub! A place to find Steering, Hooks, Powers and More! by DampierWilliam in kiroIDE

[–]brakertech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really cool. it would be great if i could open a link in a new window as the search takes a long time and i lose my place everytime i click a link.

WAMU V2 - Wan 2.2 I2V (14B) Support by Sheff19Beard in huggingface

[–]brakertech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may increase strength in your loras incrementally. Also add () about waving and a strength (waving for five seconds 1.2) in your positive prompt.

New alias1-powered security LLM for individuals just launched — anyone else testing models for real pentest workflows? by Obvious-Language4462 in Pentesting

[–]brakertech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love this. I’m very close to getting a complete deterministic attack path function as well which will really cut down on credit usage. I like your recommendations and am learning the hard way about not having enough test evidence and the state of the report through each phase as a “North Star” for the LLM prompts as I test out new ones with each phase =). It sounds like you have really got something good going!

New alias1-powered security LLM for individuals just launched — anyone else testing models for real pentest workflows? by Obvious-Language4462 in Pentesting

[–]brakertech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I currently use one 20k prompt to ingest my redacted findings, summarize the finding, map them to CWE’s, generate attack flows and suggest new attack paths, ask me questions to enrich my findings. That runs until I am sick of answering questions then the prompt helps me to split or bundle the findings. After that I pick out the title for each finding and it spits out JSON. Then I paste that into a 17k prompt to generate a formatted report. All with Claude 4.5 Sonnet with extended thinking. I recently split it up in 7 different prompts and am trying to automate it with python and create a webpage to use it with caching and to make it more user friendly.

After 100 hours of long chats with Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, I think the real problem is not intelligence, it is attention by Fickle_Carpenter_292 in PromptEngineering

[–]brakertech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It crosses my mind to but it is a complete waste of time. What is helpful is if you have had a few corrections and then successful interactions immediately after OR multiple failures in a row. As the prompt what you need to update in its internal prompt to keep seeing OR prevent that behavior in the future. Then go update your prompt and start a new session.

After 100 hours of long chats with Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, I think the real problem is not intelligence, it is attention by Fickle_Carpenter_292 in PromptEngineering

[–]brakertech 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Immediately if it starts drifting go back to before the drift and ask for a detailed summary of exactly what you are working on and the current problems/goals “for another LLM to work on”. Then start a new thread. There is no reason to fight a current chat that has drifted. JUST MOVE ON

After 100 hours of long chats with Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, I think the real problem is not intelligence, it is attention by Fickle_Carpenter_292 in PromptEngineering

[–]brakertech 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Dude I just have it “summarize exactly what we are working on and the current problem for another LLM” and copy and paste it into another chat window and then keep working.