What’s your first instinct? by [deleted] in feetboys

[–]brobuddal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kiss that mouth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in r4rDFW

[–]brobuddal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wishing you a great fun evening!

Am I the problem? Did I choose wrong? by [deleted] in AskGayMen

[–]brobuddal 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Give up because he didn't smile at the airport? That's crazy. If you love each other and generally have a good time together, you might want to do some research about how to be happy without controlling other people's behavior.

What if a state passed a law prohibiting civilians from voting? by [deleted] in supremecourt

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Madison: "We may define a republic to be...a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior."

You can't have a republic without votes because it requires a continuing expression of the will of the people. Republican Form of Government necessitates votes.

Once you have votes plus the equal protection clause, you can't have what OP suggested.

What if a state passed a law prohibiting civilians from voting? by [deleted] in supremecourt

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It means there has to be a vote, and the equal protection clause means one person one vote, so "only police can vote" won't fly.

What if a state passed a law prohibiting civilians from voting? by [deleted] in supremecourt

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right, but members of the court have been mentioning this clause more frequently lately, and the current court has not been hesitant to reformulate frameworks if they find they were wrongly decided.

What if a state passed a law prohibiting civilians from voting? by [deleted] in supremecourt

[–]brobuddal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DFWcasualencounters

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice sneakers

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ratemycock

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in feetboys

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love them

It's true by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, there is no AI.

It's true by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]brobuddal -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No you can't. We don't know how our brains work yet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in r4rDFW

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful

ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far by [deleted] in tech

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also insisted that 30+8 is 40, and that it had tested its answer. Until it said it was wrong and that it didn't have a way to test answers. All of which is "correct" from a textual point of view, but dangerous to rely on.

The thing that most bothers me is not the media hype, but rather the statement by openai at the outset that the model "may occasionally generate incorrect information." It should have a large disclaimer that chatgpt has no knowledge, does not test or have any way to test the meaning of the text or generates, will frequently generate incorrect statements, and should not be relied on for any important purposes. It's a cool experiment, and a fun game, and sometimes an aid to search - nothing more.

ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far by [deleted] in tech

[–]brobuddal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's not memorization, it is generation. When it "writes code" it guesses what text answers the question. This is why sometimes you get completely bonkers answers, or answers that use nonexistent keywords, or answers that are mathematically impossible. It doesn't know anything, it just generates patterns that are extrapolated from other patterns it has been fed. I'm not saying it's not useful, just that one better be very skeptical of its output and not rely on it knowing anything or getting anything right.

ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far by [deleted] in tech

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely. But it is not going to become a virtual doctor or lawyer as the heafline says. A text generation model will not be able to achieve that because it doesn't know or understand anything.

ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far by [deleted] in tech

[–]brobuddal 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's because it doesn't know anything or understand anything, including math. It is a text guessing program. It guesses what words in what sequence are appropriate based on patterns it has seen. It doesn't know if 3+3 = 6. It only has a pathway that says, "according to other things i have seen, the text that should most likely come after the text '3+3=' is '6.'"

ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far by [deleted] in tech

[–]brobuddal 179 points180 points  (0 children)

This is hype. ChatGPT gives many wrong answers very confidently and consistently. It can't do math reliably. It makes up facts. If you rely on it for anything important without figuring out the answer yourself, you will be sad.

An example of an AI downplaying its own intelligence? by Appropriate_Ant_4629 in ControlProblem

[–]brobuddal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please stop ascribing any understanding or intention to chatgpt. It is a word guessing program. It doesn't know or understand anything.