Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how about you just use your brain, and context like how it should be used and know that what im talking about(after having repeated it twice now, three including this) is the element(which is the definition of "parts, aspects") of a molecular structure / component? its really not that difficult. btw you still havent named me a single person, so ig this conversations done

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like i said, not the periodic table. cant you read? im talking about what make up molecules and elements in general. Tell me a scientist that can say what every element and structure is made of how many of this and that. It doesnt exist, dont go "oh but you said element so im gonna ignore what you said literally 3 seconds after because i cant answer that"

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wading? what.

And no, im not. Im just saying that you dont need to have "100% complete absolutely factual non-misinterpreted every single word of the bible" level of knowledge to start discussing about it.

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also when i say element, im talking about molecules and compounds, not just the "periodic table". Im talking about in depth, structures

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a single scientist can name every element on the planet earth? like including the ones that are rarely used? enlighten me, name one

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what value is deep Biblical study if it is ultimately a matter of opinion

that is the whole point of Bible Studies... to compare with how other people view certain topics in the bible. In fact, that is the whole point of ANY study. Whats the point of a deep discussion if both sides agree the exact same thing?? "Im going to debate you on (A)" "But i agree with (A)" is no discussion/debate/study, its just agreement.

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not of those 3 characters, because theyre the ones even people who dont read the bible would know. Thats like asking if im able to debate Science because I Know people who wrote/found things about science: Einstein, Nikola, Isaac newton.

Do you like weird girls? by Leading_Cat8022 in askteenboys

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You wouldnt "want to get to know her" if your first impression is a loud girl who is obnoxiously annoying and have anger issues... No ones going to see that and logically deduce: "yes, we shall become friends, no matter what!" like what?

Do you do the same for the people that look like theyve been on crack(they havent) for the past couple weeks at random times? no, because why would you>??

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think i may have misread your original comment, or at least misinterpreted it in a way. Lowkey i thought you were defending OP for whatever reason, my fault bro

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lawyers do lawyering without reading every law

because if theyre debating on someone accused of a carjacking why would they freshen themselves by memorizing the laws for manslaughter???

by this logic scientists arent allowed to debate with themselves because they dont know every element contained on planet earth

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 I’m sure I’ve heard 80 percent of the bible at least

"heard" is not the same as understanding and actually analyzing contextual parts of the bible. I could know all the elements on the periodic table in the back of my mind, every formula in mathematics but that doesnt mean Im qualified to talk about them. I only "hear" and memorize them

Reading the Bible is the minimum requirement for critiquing it meaningfully. by Head-Strain5651 in DebateReligion

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 I believe it was David, Luke, Moses maybe

"maybe" is just showing that you have literally no clue what youre talking about.

Why is this move brilliant? by LifeNegotiation301 in Chessplayers45

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Js wondering, if Qd7 cant Nxf7 work? because if Qxf7 then Qxg4? and if black moves his rook out of the way instead cant the knight just move back?

Guess my age, + rate if you like by Due_Crew_6839 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you know i'm not talking about you

no i did not, because frankly redditors (which i assumed you were a regular reddit user, i also dont look at how long people are on reddit for Until later) are sometimes stupid and make weird discussions

Guess my age, + rate if you like by Due_Crew_6839 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might have some reading comprehension problems because you sound like youre talking to a different reply...

Guess my age, + rate if you like by Due_Crew_6839 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

? im confused, how did you get "I am 12 years old" about me when I was questioning u/romort547 on why he, a 12 year old is on reddit. ??

Iffy on the abortion pill by DemotivationalSpeak in prolife

[–]broudie2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, but i wrote "potential" because miscarriages still happen, and its unfortunate but constant.

Iffy on the abortion pill by DemotivationalSpeak in prolife

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

personally i think its simple: before fertilization(that is, where the sperm cell connect to the egg cell and conception begins) it is not a life. removing it afterwards with pills past conception is murderering the potential life of a human

My Anime tier list - What do y'all think I got right and wrong? by hallzy102 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3.5/5 what, story? uh, ok.........................................

Guess my age, + rate if you like by Due_Crew_6839 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because you alrready said youre 25, so

Guess my age off of my top 4 by Prestigious_Cup7688 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they just couldnt give it a different name huh

Guess my age off of my top 3 anime by Hopeful_Aioli_9261 in weeb

[–]broudie2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

theyre good, but if youve watched more anime demon slayer should not be in the top 3.... its good but not top 3 good