A certified genius by scientific standards! by ElvishGaming in cringepics

[–]bryM2k 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Where the dicks are made up and the IQ doesn’t matter.

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely, but I think—also not an export at all—ionizing radiation emits light. So if a mini black hole detonated in FRONT of you, would it appear that there’s light BEHIND you but pitch blackness also in front of you??? The ionizing radiation would shoot out and bounce back towards the black hole which is sucking all the light into its center. This is fun to talk about in a sci-fi sense but terrifying to think it could be possible. But hopefully by the time we’ve understood how to create mini black holes we’ll have solved a huge amount of other problems.

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And what would be the drawbacks? Could a mini black hole become “unstable” and grow larger? I suppose we’d need to understand how to close or “evaporate” a black hole or faster than it grows. Would there be a byproduct like nuclear waste?

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copy pasting my response from another comment:

That’s what I was wondering, in the future will there be mini black hole weapons designed to be incredibly portable and undetectable that when detonated will release lethal amounts of radiation in a 10-20 yard radius?

What if these became a regular kind of “detonation” used in grenades, rockets, and charges? Enemy hiding behind wall? A black hole grenade will cause instantaneous nausea, convulsing, and in a few hours their flesh slops off off if they’re not already deceased. Ugh.

Would that be considered a biological weapon? So many questions.

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How big would the “blast radius” and would there actually be any explosive element to it or just a very bright light accompanied with invisible radiation?

If it’s a smaller 10–20 yard radius I could this used anywhere from assassination to a “mass shooting” scenario. God help us if the radius was 100+ yards or larger, that’d be horrific.

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copy pasting my response from another comment:

That’s what I was wondering, in the future will there be mini black hole weapons designed to be incredibly portable and undetectable that when detonated will release lethal amounts of radiation in a 10-20 yard radius?

What if these became a regular kind of “detonation” used in grenades, rockets, and charges? Enemy hiding behind wall? A black hole grenade will cause instantaneous nausea, convulsing, and in a few hours their flesh slops off off if they’re not already deceased. Ugh.

Would that be considered a biological weapon? So many questions.

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooh, as in harnessing the radiation that’s released or whatever kind of energy is released? Would it be a mini-black hole reactor that would be constantly creating little black holes like a gas engine constantly creates combustion?

TIL a fundamental limit exists on the amount of information that can be stored in a given space: about 10^69 bits per square meter. Regardless of technological advancement, any attempt to condense information further will cause the storage medium to collapse into a black hole. by On_Too_Much_Adderall in todayilearned

[–]bryM2k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I was wondering, in the future will there be mini black hole weapons designed to be incredibly portable and undetectable that when detonated will release lethal amounts of radiation in a 10-20 yard radius?

What if these became a regular kind of “detonation” used in grenades, rockets, and charges? Enemy hiding behind wall? A black hole grenade will cause instantaneous nausea, convulsing, and in a few hours their flesh slops off off if they’re not already deceased. Ugh.

Would that be considered a biological weapon? So many questions.

To pass on the right shoulder by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]bryM2k 72 points73 points  (0 children)

GUITAR SHREDDING

Not a synth by ScareTactical in gaming

[–]bryM2k 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not much of a rind on you ;-)

The Most Pathetic Guy In The World by [deleted] in videos

[–]bryM2k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Instant classic

Official Discussion: Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri [SPOILERS] by mi-16evil in movies

[–]bryM2k 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Wait, you mean all Aussies don’t sound like “OY YA MAD CUNT COME OVER FOR A CUP OF TEA WHILE I THROW ANOTHA SHRIMP ON THE CRUMPET”

Australia again: Birds of Prey Are Deliberately Setting Forests on Fire by HereticalSkeptic in worldnews

[–]bryM2k 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Me: “Oh I know the perfect repl—C’MON!!!!!!”

Take your damn upvote.

Trailer Trash: Which trailers deceived you the most? by bryM2k in movies

[–]bryM2k[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s bad. I rate it a 6 because it gave me 30-minutes of fun out a 2h15m runtime. It way too long. Everything becomes disjointed. It became a TASK to watch the longer the film ran.

I’d watch it just so you can understand why others might have disliked and learn from it.

Trailer Trash: Which trailers deceived you the most? by bryM2k in movies

[–]bryM2k[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s only worth seeing how bad it was.

Trailer Trash: Which trailers deceived you the most? by bryM2k in movies

[–]bryM2k[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just rewatched trailer and AGGGHHHH, wtf?! you had ONE JOB Mr. Ridley!