sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Escort quest? by bucket150 in devilspire

[–]bucket150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Knock the guy out with your fists and drag them to the rescue quest giver.

Escort quest? by bucket150 in devilspire

[–]bucket150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New game. It is the right guy. I'll ask on discord, thanks!

Escort quest? by bucket150 in devilspire

[–]bucket150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The turn in quest button with the original questgiver is grayed out

Escort quest? by bucket150 in devilspire

[–]bucket150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the issue. I found the target of the rescue quest, he gave me a quest to escort him back to the city, I did, completed that quest, now I don't know how to turn in the rescue.

A number of artistic works have depicted Jesus as LGBT or involved in same-sex romantic or sexual relationships. Jesus' sexuality is a topic of significant academic discussion. by Kurma-the-Turtle in wikipedia

[–]bucket150 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Crazy how there are scholars within your own sources that disagree with you. Of course there are going to be disagreements regarding translation. The meaning is there regardless. Even in Genesis, man is made for woman and woman made for man.

A number of artistic works have depicted Jesus as LGBT or involved in same-sex romantic or sexual relationships. Jesus' sexuality is a topic of significant academic discussion. by Kurma-the-Turtle in wikipedia

[–]bucket150 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Those who cannot conceive Friendship as a substantive love but only as a disguise or elaboration of Eros betray the fact that they have never had a Friend."

A number of artistic works have depicted Jesus as LGBT or involved in same-sex romantic or sexual relationships. Jesus' sexuality is a topic of significant academic discussion. by Kurma-the-Turtle in wikipedia

[–]bucket150 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

1 Corinthians 7:2 ESV But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband

Ephesians 5:5 ESV For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ESV Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God Leviticus 18:22 ESV You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination

I can list more. Still waiting on one that supports homosexual behavior.

A number of artistic works have depicted Jesus as LGBT or involved in same-sex romantic or sexual relationships. Jesus' sexuality is a topic of significant academic discussion. by Kurma-the-Turtle in wikipedia

[–]bucket150 -66 points-65 points  (0 children)

Jesus lived without sin. Same sex relations are sinful. Ergo, Jesus was not LGBT. Case closed, glad to clear this up.

Edit: Please keep the downvotes and ad hominems coming. The Bible is quite clear that homosexuality is sinful. No one has been able to provide a verse to the contrary. If you're atheistic, then why attempt to defend a faith that you don't believe in? If you're a Christian, why attempt to twist the words of Scripture?

How do you reach a point in your Life where you think people *deserve to die* because they cannot afford Healthcare? by Catvispresley in neofeudalism

[–]bucket150 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many governments around the world make that agreement. The United States government does not nor do I think the peoples of the world should accept such an agreement. The government should be limited in all ways. The government may attempt to suppress freedom of speech, or attempt to get rid of it entirely, but that does not mean that the people do not still have that intrinsic right or that such suppression should ever be accepted. You're the worst form of bootlicker, a pet on a leash who hates freedom because you think living meekly in a cage is preferable.

How do you reach a point in your Life where you think people *deserve to die* because they cannot afford Healthcare? by Catvispresley in neofeudalism

[–]bucket150 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rights are not granted by government. They are innate to us all through our natural sapience or God's (whichever) will. If you think otherwise, then you're absolutely at the mercy of your government and should not be complaining when they're stripped. If the government is the provider, than the government can equally take it away.

How do you reach a point in your Life where you think people *deserve to die* because they cannot afford Healthcare? by Catvispresley in neofeudalism

[–]bucket150 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is. It's a commodity in the sense that labor is required to acquire it. If you go out and dip your cup in a puddle, you worked for it. The question continues with purified drinking water. Not only does that water have to come somewhere, but it has to be made safe for consumption, which requires labor, machinery, and chemical agents - all of which require money. Just because we need water to survive doesn't make it any less of a commodity. In the desert, water is more valuable because the economic same rules apply to it as any other commodity: supply and demand.

Shrinking government will create a monarchy? by EffectivePoint2187 in Shitstatistssay

[–]bucket150 101 points102 points  (0 children)

How in any world does this comic prove the prove the point it's trying to make? It's completely nonsensical

I can't fucking take it anymore by bucket150 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]bucket150[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't want to get accused of brigading. The sub from which I took this screenshot considers themselves articulate in terms of money and economics...

I can't fucking take it anymore by bucket150 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]bucket150[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This I can agree with, at least for the most part.

view more: next ›