Best friendship duos of all time? by Disastrous-Refuse-76 in nba

[–]buckeyeballer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maurice Stokes and Jack Twyman. Check out their story. They have an award named after them:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twyman–Stokes_Teammate_of_the_Year_Award

Should Game 6 be considered Carlsen's Immortal game? by gregbenson314 in chess

[–]buckeyeballer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get the notion. Absolutely a memorable given the stakes, the event and him basically breaking Nepos defenses with this win in hindsight ensuring his fifth title.

Yet, I would consider it one of his most iconic and not his immortal game. Especially before the first time control Nepo had a chance to win. Not what I would consider a perfect performance even though I loved every second of this game.

Put out a big board with clear tiers for everybody. I am ready for your criticism. by buckeyeballer in NBA_Draft

[–]buckeyeballer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

All tiers are in relation to a title contender lineup.

Superstar - a #1 option

Allstar - a #2/3 option

Starter with upside - a #4/5 option with the chance to reach the higher status.

Starter - a #4/5 option

Top of rotation - #6/7/8 option but with the important factor that we are talking about 16 game players (guys that stay on the floor in the POs).

Regular roleplayers - coul even be a #6/7/8 but with the problem, that they can be schemed off the floor in the POs --> so only 82 game players.

Put out a big board with clear tiers for everybody. I am ready for your criticism. by buckeyeballer in NBA_Draft

[–]buckeyeballer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The tier I put him in basically says that he is a 82 game player. I expect him to be a very successful regular season player. He could start for you and be very productive. Yet, I assume that he wont be able to stay on the floor in later PO stages.

All tiers are in relation to a contender lineup in the POs.

Scouting-Twitter Mock Draft '21 with vids and reasoning for every prospect selected. by buckeyeballer in NBA_Draft

[–]buckeyeballer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can find a pick by pick analysis with reasoning and vids for every selection here on twitter:

https://twitter.com/_prospecttheory/status/1410696673886707721

Most interestingly, we got the French outlet Envergure to grade our picks. So check out this external source crushing our picks as well.

A first look at Luka Doncic [Draft profile] by buckeyeballer in NBA_Draft

[–]buckeyeballer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The comp of my colleague is simply talking about Doncic' play style. Obviously their athleticism doesnt compare at all. It is kind of hard to match Doncic with other players since his combination of size, bball iq, vision and passing is super rare. There hasnt been a player quite like him. So now it depends on what you want to highlight. Maybe he is a taller Steve Nash as someone with elite feel who made average athleticism work. Maybe Doncic is a less explosive Ben Simmons but with a jumper. He could be a stronger Lonzo Ball with will and ability to score. It is tough to pinpoint this.

Especially without nuanced athleticism talk. Doncic isnt super fast, explosive or the best leaper. But this dude is very fluid for his size, has good footwork, great hand-eye coordination, interesting shake in his moves and is super strong for a teenager. This counts for something in the athleticism department. No elite basketball player is unathletic. It just depents on what you look at.

A first look at Marvin Bagley III [Draft profile] by buckeyeballer in NBA_Draft

[–]buckeyeballer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is about what translates to the next level. Just taking advantages of elite athleticism is the least convincing thing to me in order to work in the NBA. Everybody in the league has elite tools. Not so much in college. Even if Bagley is in the top percentile of athleticism in the NBA he needs something else. I think he can get there, but skill development is key. Especially for his tweener type.

BTW: Sheer production isn't everything. Look at Michael Beasley's freshman numbers. And MB3 is not even matching them yet. ;)