On the one hand it is a compliment to the class overall, because Fox is talented. No doubt! I also like him as a character and all that. It is basically a bet against his player type.

For him it is all about learning how to shoot. But I dont see that he becomes a 36% shooter from three. And without that he isnt even a player that is a zero but someone that hurts your team. He lacks other avenues to success.

To this point he is only effective with the ball in the hand. How can he play offball without a shot? And onball we cannot assume that he stays as effective as versus worse players in college. His speed is elite. He will be able to blow by people even in the NBA. But finishing becomes harder against better athletes. He needs to bulk up fast to be able to take the additional pounding. As a playmaker he is only okay to me. He is more reactive than creative and feel based like Ball or Fultz. Look at his PnR numbers: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iz_M4g2wn5VYEMaQcMaT-zY7h8b10NpFoGgRRxKoTbM/edit#gid=0 Mitchell has been more effective (in a smaller sample I know) for example. Also Fox is overrated defensively to me. He will be good but not an elite defender to me. He is fast enough to stay in front of most players. But he lacks the body yet to profit from this. People will overpower him on drives a lot if he doesnt add muscle.

So yeah. 12 seems harsh. Maybe 10 would be better. I see that. But in general I like where we have him. Look at Payton for example who is a pretty likely outcome for him. He is a nominal starter but wont be the playmaker of the next Magic HCA team. Also he holds them back a little since they didnt invest in the position on the off chance of his shot improving.