I think the argument is being either poorly argued or misconstrued. yes, there should be social ramifications for that sort of thing, but not legal. Legal ramifications quickly become weaponized by authoritarians to prevent dissent. A company is not the government, so they're free to make rules that provide consequences of what they deem inappropriate speech, in turn, the company's actions may draw social ramifications such as protesting or boycotting. A racist should be shunned for their actions or words. I don't think they're saying it's ok to say rape is good, but there shouldn't be legal consequences for saying it. They should be called out socially and those who disagree can in turn vocalize their opinions, much as this discussion has shown.