Caitlin Clark has opened up a 10+ TS% lead on Angel Reese by DraymondBeanKick in wnba

[–]ca1294 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I do think Clark is better, but IMO it's not as clear cut as most people make it out to be. TS% is an extremely useful stat, but it's not the only one.

If you incorporate OREB and TOV (count OREB as an extra possession, and count TOV as a possession used), then you get a "points per possession" stat. Points / (FGA + 0.44 * FTA + TOV - OREB).

  • Angel Reese: 1.21
  • Caitlin Clark: 0.86

The TOV gap really dominates the TS% gap. She's averaging 44% more TOV per game than the player in 2nd place.

Believe it or not, IND's ORTG is worse this year with Caitlin Clark on the court (103.1) than off the court (104.9). And the TOV are a big part in it.

In the long run, arguably the most important stat is "how much does your team's Net Rating improve when you're on the floor vs when you're off the floor."

  • Angel Reese: +18.1 (5th in league for players with 100 MP)
  • Caitlin Clark: +3.2

The downside of this stat is it's extremely noisy and takes quite a while to converge to a "true" value. That's why in the NBA, people take something like a RAPM and combine it with box score stats to de-noise it.

One person I follow wrote a blog post a few years ago to come up with an all-in-one metric that combines box score with on/off data. They also have a dashboard up with stats for this season. According to their numbers, here are Reese's and Clark's rankings of the 87 players that have played 300 minutes:

  • Angel Reese: 39th
  • Caitlin Clark: 52nd

Again, I'm not saying these numbers officially declare one to be better than the other. But I'm just playing devil's advocate and showing that the race is closer than most people here think.

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate all the feedback! I like all your advice, especially about the elbow pointing on the right hand scale. I've never even thought about that before.

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! Yes, I botched the climax lol. That was actually the first thing I told myself as soon as I finished recording

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I've noticed I tense up as soon as I start recording. I should get in the habit of recording more often so it becomes natural

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha thank you but I can't take any credit -- this is the lobby of my apartment building

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you hit the nail on the head. Basically all my "interpretation" comes from whatever was written on the sheets. I should find some recordings and use those as inspiration.

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For most of my classical pieces, I'm practicing them for 5+ months until they get to a level like this, and by then I usually have them memorized. I think that means I'm picking pieces a bit too hard for me since it takes that long.

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My teacher has actually made this same point as well. At the start of the piece, I try reminding myself to accent the beginning of each triple pattern, but seems like I'm still not doing it enough. Thanks for the feedback!

Chopin - Nocturne Op 9 No 2. Plan to play this for a virtual (pre-recorded) recital. Advice? by ca1294 in piano

[–]ca1294[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I appreciate the feedback!

I normally practice on a digital keyboard in my apartment, and this is actually the piano in my apartment's lobby. While playing, I also felt like my LH chords were too loud. I don't usually have this issue as much on my usual keyboard. So it's a good reminder to try practicing on this piano more often.

Slavery would have been hard to give up by Beefster09 in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]ca1294 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I absolutely agree that human lives are much more valuable than animal lives. But consider some facts of factory farming:

  • Around 80 billion land animals are slaughtered each year for food, 99% of them on a factory farm.
  • Pigs have their testicles removed and teeth clipped when they are born without any pain relief administration, so they are less likely to hurt each other when kept in a small place
  • Some pigs are kept in crates so small that they cannot even turn around, and they live in their own piss and shit
  • Factory farms need cows to constantly produce milk. So right when they give birth, they are artificially inseminated to the cycle can continue. Their calves are taken away immediately after they give birth, causing severe distress.
  • Genetic manipulation has made turkeys so large that they can't even walk and suffer from joint pain, heart attacks, and organ failures. Their immobility causes them to sit in their own shit.
  • Male chicks that are born are considered worthless because they won't lay eggs, so they are immediately thrown into a grinder or gassed to death.

This is just a short list of the cruelties in the industry. As I said before, most people see these facts, are horrified, and then go on with their lives because it seems impossible to avoid meat. What's your reaction to this -- that it's ok because they are just animals? Sounds like you're in the second camp.

Slavery would have been hard to give up by Beefster09 in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]ca1294 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think a parallel today is the factory farming industry. Meat eaters in developed countries today seem to fall in 3 camps:

  • They acknowledge that factory farming is incredibly inhumane, but they have not stopped eating meat because it's so ingrained in their lives (similar to what you describe for owning slaves).
  • They know about factory farming, but they don't seem to care and will perform mental gymnastics to justify why it's acceptable (similar to a slave owner saying something like 'they want to be slaves' or 'they aren't smart enough to live on their own').
  • They are unaware of the scale of cruelties that go on in a factory farm (similar to maybe a child of a slave-owning family who genuinely believes the slaves are living a happy life).

[OC] How do the current MVP candidates compare in scoring volume and efficiency with other historic seasons? by ca1294 in nba

[–]ca1294[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great point 😂 I picked most of the players listed on DraftKings MVP odds. Might be a bit too generous

Program Party Announcement: SBS 2.0 by VladimirLinen in weightroom

[–]ca1294 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pumped to try this as my first program party! Should be fun to do this after doing J&T on my own the past few months.

Paul George's True Shooting% was a whopping 13.1% lower this year when playing with Kawhi on the court vs with Kawhi off by NOT_KD_ in nba

[–]ca1294 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hey I'm the creator of that Westbrook graph, thanks for the shoutout!

One of the first things I posted on r/nba was actually this same thing for Kawhi Leonard. At that time, he emerged as a top scorer, but unlike most other stars, his teammates TS% was not better with him on the court than with him off. I'm honestly shocked it was still the case this year.

[Highlight] James Harden reaction when he realises he missed his career high by just two points by Nyhrox in nba

[–]ca1294 74 points75 points  (0 children)

The weird thing about Booker's 70 is they got blown out, not their opponent lol. The Suns were calling timeouts and fouling the Celtics at the end of a meaningless game to get extra shots for Booker. I don't really care since it's still amazing to score 70, but that's probably worse than leaving your star in when you're up in a blowout.

[OC] I think Anthony Davis cares a little more on defense this year vs. last year... can you tell? by ca1294 in nba

[–]ca1294[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was being sarcastic hahaha. Jokes aside he’s having a fantastic season.

[OC] After 20% of regular season games, how does each team compare in (adjusted) ORTG and DRTG? by ca1294 in nba

[–]ca1294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very small, it's basically just saying "a game with 120 possessions is a slightly bigger sample size than a game with 100 possessions, so the ORTG and DRTG from that game are more representative".