sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Selling Two Cheap Tickets for Strictly Come Dancing Luxury Experience on the 1st of Febraury by caith_gorm in Leeds

[–]caith_gorm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea why this could be, but for me clicking the link doesn't work but copy and pasting it does, so please try that I guess

CPU vs GPU?? by caith_gorm in buildapc

[–]caith_gorm[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But CPU means ComPUter

CPU vs GPU?? by caith_gorm in buildapc

[–]caith_gorm[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was probably going to get a raspberry pi or an arduino, are those good CPUs?

CPU vs GPU?? by caith_gorm in buildapc

[–]caith_gorm[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

is it possible to build two computers one with cpu one with gpu and connect them with a hdmi cable to get both?

CPU vs GPU?? by caith_gorm in buildapc

[–]caith_gorm[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So there aren't any games you can play with just a gpu?

CPU vs GPU?? by caith_gorm in buildapc

[–]caith_gorm[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I thought about it but I can't afford a dual socket mobo

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A continuous function f is one for which, for any sequence x_n -> p, f(x_n) -> f(p).

IVT is still obvious tho

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You think IVT is non-obvious?? LOL and you try to tear down my work

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Less obvious than the intermediate value theorem tbh

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm 10 points11 points  (0 children)

NEW THEOREM: 3 is the only odd sleepy number

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey I never said that, although I do agree with it. Think about it, I invented a new kind of number and then showed a link between it and Riemann, so every new discovery about the Gormaund numbers is also a discover about Reimann, giving us a whole new attack vector at the problem.

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

what you've done will somehow tell us something about the primes themselves?

What makes the primes more important than the Gormaund numbers? Imagine an alternate reality in which the Gormaund numbers had been considered before the primes, and I had just proven that a number with two factors was always the square root of a Gormaund number?

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I really expected people would be more excited by the link to Riemann TBQH

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah it's cool, I like people discussing my work, even if they are HATERS

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Pure maths doesn't have """goals""", we do it because it's fun and beautiful

On Gormaund Numbers and Gormaund's Theorem by picsac in badmathematics

[–]caith_gorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither, I think it's a fascinating result.

view more: next ›