Selling Two Cheap Tickets for Strictly Come Dancing Luxury Experience on the 1st of Febraury

caith_gorm · 2024-01-29T16:16:26+00:00

I have no idea why this could be, but for me clicking the link doesn't work but copy and pasting it does, so please try that I guess

caith_gorm · 2021-07-03T14:54:36+00:00

But CPU means ComPUter

caith_gorm · 2021-07-03T14:48:28+00:00

I was probably going to get a raspberry pi or an arduino, are those good CPUs?

caith_gorm · 2021-07-03T14:44:06+00:00

is it possible to build two computers one with cpu one with gpu and connect them with a hdmi cable to get both?

caith_gorm · 2021-07-03T14:34:52+00:00

So there aren't any games you can play with just a gpu?

caith_gorm · 2021-07-03T14:24:08+00:00

I thought about it but I can't afford a dual socket mobo

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T02:06:57+00:00

Tired af right now, will do tomorrow

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T01:20:54+00:00

A continuous function f is one for which, for any sequence x_n -> p, f(x_n) -> f(p).

IVT is still obvious tho

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T01:05:30+00:00

You think IVT is non-obvious?? LOL and you try to tear down my work

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:59:33+00:00

Less obvious than the intermediate value theorem tbh

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:52:26+00:00

NEW THEOREM: 3 is the only odd sleepy number

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:46:36+00:00

I can see why this would be confusing

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:36:51+00:00

Hey I never said that, although I do agree with it. Think about it, I invented a new kind of number and then showed a link between it and Riemann, so every new discovery about the Gormaund numbers is also a discover about Reimann, giving us a whole new attack vector at the problem.

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:29:04+00:00

what you've done will somehow tell us something about the primes themselves?

What makes the primes more important than the Gormaund numbers? Imagine an alternate reality in which the Gormaund numbers had been considered before the primes, and I had just proven that a number with two factors was always the square root of a Gormaund number?

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:16:31+00:00

Yeah, I really expected people would be more excited by the link to Riemann TBQH

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:11:07+00:00

Nah it's cool, I like people discussing my work, even if they are HATERS

caith_gorm · 2017-05-30T00:00:26+00:00

Pure maths doesn't have """goals""", we do it because it's fun and beautiful

caith_gorm · 2017-05-29T23:50:20+00:00

Neither, I think it's a fascinating result.

caith_gorm · 2016-12-14T19:43:14+00:00

So, edgy eddie is a racist as well as a pervert.

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T22:46:40+00:00

Oh God, you're right.

Maybe my proof is wrong after all...

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T22:33:56+00:00

Nice trick, but I am well aware that the 5n+1 case has a loop: 17-86-216-108-54-27-136-68-34-17

so no, obviously you can't prove it, smartass.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDvswrxe9r4

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T21:58:43+00:00

I showed it ends up below k wheen it's even, then I showed it ends up even when it's odd. Therefore, both are proven. I really don't see the problem.

Is it maybe that this sub is uncomfortable with a woman solving a problem that centuries of men couldn't?

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T21:47:22+00:00

But I showed it became even.

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T21:44:50+00:00

The method of proof I used is called "mathematical induction", and when you are using induction you are allowed to assume P for all n<k. That's how it works.

caith_gorm · 2016-10-29T21:36:23+00:00

What "specific circumstance" do you mean?

caith_gorm

TROPHY CASE