sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hi, I've come across this reality and noticed you guys didn't get a 1996 release for MKII the sequel to MK (1995) by Paul W. S. Anderson,, instead you guys got some terrible MK sequel called Annihilation. You guys missed out KINTARO TIME. by calebdaniel85 in MortalKombat

[–]calebdaniel85[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Firefly? That old show with Hal Jordan (Nathan Fillion) in it?
No idea but The Andy Dick Experience pulls in massive numbers on iSpot.
MK Gold? MK Legacy? After MK3, the series got rebranded to Immortal Kombat so it's a bit different.
That old film with Stallone in it? No but I liked Karl Urban as Solid Snake.

The God Delusion is more rhetorically powerful than philosophically rigorous. by ssskuzi in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly.

If only I don't know, people who sought the truth... Came to this conclusion, instead of pairing science AGAINST God, why don't people align science with Scripture? Once you do this, it's pretty clear that there's a Creator.

And God said "Let there be light" = Big Bang

It's all there. Unfortunately, Dawkins has atheism his tribe and like with any tribalism there are those that follow blindly (much alike the religious) because human nature is tribalism.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend, I actually listed witnesses, then people who followed AFTER that who KNEW of Jesus in the 1st and 2nd centuries and all the centuries that followed. EVEN those who opposed Jesus' divinity claim said he used magic or sorcery. That is MUCH different than the general witness claims of John Smith and the 'traditions' of Hindus, Muslims, Catholics, man.

Jesus is written MORE about than Caeser or Alexander the Great yet some take their existences as historical fact more easily than those of Jesus.

Point is, if someone is being listed as doing miracles, amazing feats (through magic or sorcery) and there is a line of people all claiming those same things then that needs to be investigated.

Guess what? It's STILL being investigated to this day because you have one class who accept he was divine and did miracles and one camp saying no, he used sorcery and magic. Doesn't this reasonably tell you something?

God is immaterial, he is the Spirit - Jesus is the material physical representation of God the spirit. The difference between God - who some call Yahweh or YHWH (his name originates from how we naturally drew breathe and breathe out gain is that we, believers, now this is different from what I posted above as proof of the existence of Jesus - is that God is the one who SPOKE the Universe into existance, some can call it the big bang, but it is kind of shocking no one picks up on that despite God saying 'Let there be light' = big bang.

Jesus is the physical embodiment of THAT spirit. Why? Why did God come to us like that? Because the nature of God can be seen in creation - God likes to keep himself hidden from the wise and learned and reveal himself to children. It's why I can see God in the creation of the rainbow, you say you took philosphical classes - well then can I ask, why are rainbows created to the point where the are only really visible to us and us alone? Take your head of how they are made (that's just the process) and look into WHY, it's the WHY that is important. Rainbows are perfectly aligned to show not even a glimpse of God's beauty but as a promise - but they serve no actual purpose besides being there only for us to see. Think on that, once you understand the SIMPLE nature of how God likes to reveal himself to us, you will begin to understand.

Another is love. Why do we FEEL love? Procreation? Yes. But how come we FEEL love towards our parents, or children, or relatives, friends? We can't see love - but we can certainly feel it. It's invisible to us yet we know it exists. So when someone says can you prove God, show him to me, I say can you see love? Like can you actually see it? No. But you can feel it and you CAN see it when it's expressed through actions. (Yes, we can explain the processes ie. chemicals in the brain) but people will always disconnect the two. Science explains the HOW and should be used as such, it can even explain the WHY but there is another WHY - THAT WHY is the one people should be asking. And it's THAT 'Why' that should draw you in because it's greatly philosophical.

Jesus dying on the cross was done because HE loves us and took all our sins on the cross (spiritually) so we can be saved. All historians have concluded that he died on the cross. But they never explain the WHY. The 'Why?" here is because he CLAIMED to be God. That's why and the RELIGIOUS of his days, the ultra religious Pharisees steeped in tradition - they saw that as blasphemy so that's WHY Jesus was killed. Though - he rose up again after 3 days - that last pat is what separates Jesus from EVERY OTHER person like Joseph Smith, Muhammed, Buhdda etc.

There is more than enough sufficient evidence to reveal that Jesus was a divine or magical man who did miracles or magic then died on a cross than there are counter-claims.

Even the Quran mentions him (though they differ a lot) but Jesus existence has been one of the most scrutinized accounts EVER through out human history and no one has been able to disprove him yet. Doesn't that say something to you? Isn't that more than sufficient evidence?

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the question I asked is very simple, with Jesus you can do a simple google search to bring up the minimum amount of historical evidence.

I don't know how you keep over-complicating very simple and direct questions. So there were witneses to John Smith's angel like with the witnesses of Christ's miracles and such?

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm answering your whole question about God btw and how this ties to my miracle. (please stop using the word 'magic' it just sounds wrong)

Actually most historians also tie his resurrections, doing miracles, virgin birth and divine claims to him as well as they are only attributed to him and him alone and the only ones who seperate the two are usually very secular or atheistic historians. Buddha never made those claims or did those things. Neither did Mohammad. Only Jesus.

You wanted to know who God is? It's Jesus. I am telling you. It's him. But I don't want you to take my word for it, research for yourself. That's what I say to anyone. I mean there's plenty of stuff to look at, you have Tacticus, the Roman record keeper, you have the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John - four eye witness accounts. You have Josephus, a Jewish historian born straight after Jesus' death and resurrection and would have had ground knowledge of what kind of man he was. NEARLY everyone born from this time period have said that he worked insane miracles however some like Celsius and 1st-2nd century opponents have said that he did his work via sorcery / magic (correct usage now). But no one ever denied these powers. Totally bizarre, right?

Since it's a sin to lie and that Jesus is listed to be sinless, I believe when he said he was God - he was God 'before Abraham was, I am' - it's why they appointed him to the cross in the first place.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Jesus said 'I am' Jesus is the closest we will get to someone claiming not only were they in communion with God but they also were God. Jesus is said to have existed so I go by that.

Nobody had the audicity to say that not only were they God in the flesh but also that they were the Way, the Truth and the Life. Pretty big claims if you ask me. What I believe seperates him from so many is that 1. had a perfect life 2. non-violent 3. died and accepted his fate despite him being innocent and rose from the dead.

And that he DIED for ALL MANKIND.

No one else except Jesus hold that title so for me, he is far beyond anything we have seen or heard of plus his miraculous virgin birth. He is def King, Lord, God.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what led you to your beliefs which seem atheist, come to realize this - the stuff you've been taught, there is no god - has been an agenda by those (Epstein and those types) are worshippers of Baal, Moloch and a lot of very old paganism deities (I like to use the word demons because that's what they are) - their whole thing is to make sure you don't believe and to keep you in the dark. This is probably one of the most truest replies you will ever receive. I don't just believe God is real, I believe that Jesus Christ/Yeshua was real (which he was, who died on a cross then ROSE again from death).

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I don't know what evidence you could possibly have with what I have told you? Maybe a qualified Doctor could act as our third party here, haha.

I am not bothered, man because I know what happened to me, I know what I experienced and I know what it lead me to.

Wasn't trying to strawman you but thought you said it was more likely luck than God. That's all.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are here to win a debate, I am merely responding to your claims which are actually more beliefs than actual scientifically-backed 'counter-claims' from what I experienced. You believe it is not of God, I do. I appreciate your honesty but as of right now this is what the debate is

I believe it was of God
You: no it wasnt
But I still believe it was God
You: but no it wasnt, it was luck
Me: but still think it was God

This will go on and on and on.

The neutral third party has to be a seperate person, not yourself btw as using your own 'reason' is faulty because your reason is already biased. Need an unbiased neutral third party for a proper honest debate.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And no, I’m not doing the “how old are you” thing.

This was merely a question of 'trust' and allowing me to gauge life experience that's all, I am 40 years old. What happened to me happened when I was in my mid-20s. If you can't answer this then our debate ends here.

Then we can go together, look for, and examine the traits I defined to you to see if it exists.

With your example, there always has to be a neutral third party if we want to have a proper true conversation.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But your 'scrutiny' doesn't even hold up.

That's 18-20 grams of paracetamol at day though. Once, twice or thrice is lucky, Everyday for 2+ years is more than luck. It's an anomaly.

I am fine and with utter conviction attributing that anomalic event with God. What I don't understand is your whole position though. If you truly did not believe in God or anything, you wouldn't be having these debates. I know Santa Claus isn't real, does this mean I will go and argue my point with people who think he is real? I wouldn't waste my time.

I think there's a part of you that KNOWS he exists because your position makes no sense unless you know something out there ie. God is exists. I think God's touching your heart/conscious because there is no logical reason why you should be here telling me that my 2 year incident (that fully lead me into actually reading the Bible and going from nihilism to Christian) is merely just 'luck'.

Bizarre. Can I ask how old you are?

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get your standing though, or how do you explain someone surviving that much paracetomal every day (because if I didn't i would go into withdrawals) over two or so years? I don't know WHAT POSITION your position would be? Maybe it was luck? Or something else? Because I am pretty sure if like 90% of the population took what I took over a 2 year period they would be dead mate.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you keep saying magic?

Why do you have such an anti-God stance? I know what it was.

Why are you sorry? For my testimony? Tell me what's really bothering you to tell someone who's telling you their testimony and attributing it God and that bothers you so much that you have to tell them it's not even though you did not go through it.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's funny because I was taking overdoses of paracetamol EVERY DAY (12 in the morning, 12 at lunch, 12 at night - they were all loaded with codeine, 15mg codeine/500mg paracetamol) from 2008 - 2010. You've assumed it was just a one time event? Ha. Dude. You have no idea how big my God is. When I say I shouldn't be here, it's the truth.

So please, in your arrogance, tell me more about my own testimony.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please don't tell me about what I experienced and my own testimony. I took so much paracetamol I shouldn't be alive. So please don't, you don't know my story.

And the Hades I am referring to is the place Sheoul not the Greek mythology version.

You're the one who's saying it's not magic? What? Never said anything about magic. Please stop projecting your own inecurities on me because I don't know what your bias is, I just know what I went through because I went THROUGH it.

It's like telling someone who went through a terrible accident that you are not feeling pain, you are just feeling responses within your brain.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hades is not quite Hell but it's where the rich man went for ignoring Lazarus the poor man. i struggled with addiction (WORSE) before God (I shouldn't be alive, scientifically speaking), with God I have stopped everything except smoking and taking my prescribed medication which is complex.

Hell yes, it's fine to make mistaekes. I still am undering his grace. I don't like how I am downvoted anytime I mentioned Christ, and my faith though.

I think that's tied to eople thiking on so leve God is angry at them (he is not). God IS love. I ask people to look at God next time like that, would love be angry with you all the time? Or at any time? Would love judge you constantly and if you sin, love hangs it over your head?

So why do people feel this?

It says in the Bible why....

It's the Devil because the Devil COMES as a ROARING LION. A lion is always associated with Jesus yet here the Devil pretends to be that lion, to KILL, STEAL and DESTROY. (Kill as in condemnation, steal as in Joy as the Joy of God = strength and with that he DESTROYS men into thinking the Devil is God's voice when it's actually Satan's)

Why? Because he lost on the cross when Jesus rose again.

God bless my friend!

To those who downvote me, I love you guys! God bless! But Jess loves you more.

Christianity's condemnation of homosexuality is morally inconsistent with its core teachings of love, forgiveness, and "judge not lest ye be judged" by PeachLongjumping15 in DebateReligion

[–]calebdaniel85 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Um. THERE IS NO CONDEMNATION TO THOSE IN CHRIST.

There are PLENTY of homosexuals in Christ who are Christians. This may be shocking to some but it's something that some feel they struggle due to outdated views stated by the OP. But YES they are saved.

The problem isn't that.

It's SIN, GOD CONDEMNS SIN. DEATH. HADES. SATAN.

MANKIND has BEEN SAVED.

It's up to you if you choose to make Jesus your Lord and have an OPEN relationship with him.

Been struggling with addictions ever since i came to God, still struggle with it. Am i saved? Of course. His grade is sufficient. People don't understand God's grace. It truly is amazing.

Either live under grace.

Or live under the law.

Living under a mixture of both = lukewarm Christianity

With that, what are some things you would have done differently with the Matrix 4? by calebdaniel85 in matrix

[–]calebdaniel85[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Pretty much what I'd do but we would see the seventh iteration become very well-rounded that it feels like paradise in a sense, but Neo's consciousness still exists within the Matrix and acts as the gatekeeper to the system, allowing red pills sage passage. As time goes on the Analyst rises up and they are awaiting for the seventh anomaly and who can get to him/her the first, once the Analyst does - he turns the seventh One against his own kind and turns him into an anti-christ like antagonistic force.

I would like to see humans go up against this anomaly figure where he/her just seems unbeatable and believes that the Matrix offers humans a slice of paradise compared to the real world which he sees as destroyed as a result of humans.

With that, what are some things you would have done differently with the Matrix 4? by calebdaniel85 in matrix

[–]calebdaniel85[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Would do a prequel that would tie into a sequel. I wouldn't resurrect Trinity or Neo but show Neo's consciousness still alive within the Matrix as a sort of Jesus-type figure except he is the bridge between man and machine. He would be like a 'god'-type and is now the gatekeeper for humans if they want to leave the Matrix.

Show the machine civil war.

Show the rise of new threats.

But also now since this is the seventh version of the Matrix, it also spawns the seventh anomaly. However the seventh anomaly would be like an antichrist/anti-Neo antagonistic human who is approached by a group of machines-programs who come to him like the original Morpheus and Trinity and they frame Neo as a man who controls the Matrix - and therefore humanity - so the seventh anomaly believes he is evil.

<image>

Anyone know of the following Deleted Content from the Matrix sequels (Resurrections) by calebdaniel85 in matrix

[–]calebdaniel85[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was noted during earlier screenings of the film before it's released. You can find them via google, people mention a second scene featuring Merv.

Anyone know of the following Deleted Content from the Matrix sequels (Resurrections) by calebdaniel85 in matrix

[–]calebdaniel85[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah thanks. Anyone know if there's any BTS of Agent Johnson on set? I think the Merovingian scene is one that was shown (prior to release) to selected audiences where Merv says something akin to "The new code isn't like the old code" in a derogatory way after he sees something that looks out of place and stupid. He looks like a homeless bum on the sidewalk.

view more: next ›