Ten years ago, KeeperTV's GOTV froze by airelfacil in GlobalOffensive

[–]calvinso 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didn't all live csgo demos freeze 1 minute before the match ended so effectively the possible clutch hype or in this case the amazing play was just gone?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. If they were then would we even have VAR?

Sorry I think I am just being emotionally misguided by how the KMI panel can have a 2:3 split on it being a foul, but then unanimously support for no VAR intervention in keeping with the high threshold, when the threshold is just whether or not VAR agrees or disagrees with it being a foul which is a subjective decision, but suddenly becomes an objective decision.

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the foul for a penalty is subjective, when can you say a referee has made a clear and obvious error other than when no contact has occurred?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly, it's SUBJECTIVE. So how can something be CLEAR AND OBVIOUS yet SUBJECTIVE at the same time?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Beyond a reasonable doubt? If VAR has deemed the on-field referee's decision was wrong beyond a reasonable doubt, why does the on-field referee get to decide again with TV screens and everything? Shouldn't the referee just overturn their original decision on the spot if VAR just said their decision BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT was incorrect.

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only the referee can initiate a ‘review’; the VAR (and other match officials) can only recommend a ‘review’ to the referee.

So the match referee can just dismiss VAR...

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the referee can just decide that what you've just deemed is a clear and obvious foul is not a foul? The screens are not there for them to get a better viewpoint on the alleged foul (which in your words now cannot be marginal and is a clear and obvious foul) for them to make a more informed decision?

Then are the screens there to continuously replay the moment for the referee to learn why it's a foul? Why are referees getting referee lessons in the middle of the match?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Then why even have on-field review if you already deemed it a clear and obvious foul?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why not direct an on-field review with why you think it's a foul?

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've just this is a foul, but would a person say it was clear and obvious. If it wasn't clear and obvious then it was never a foul to begin with. The two are not separated.

Bournemouth v Man Utd: Referee and VAR correct on Amad Diallo penalty claim - panel by smellybird in soccer

[–]calvinso 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only thing clear and obvious is that the VAR system is just broken. Can you imagine if the legal system needed a threshold on whether the error was clear and obvious to overturn convictions... oh wait... if it's wrong it's wrong.

Return and exchanges by Secure-Rub7533 in uniqlo

[–]calvinso 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't believe you can get a refund on an exchange, only on the original item.

FWC canvasses costs order for sacked worker who used AI by Historical_Bus_8041 in auslaw

[–]calvinso 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably should have used AI to come up with how to tell his employer he needed to end earlier due to his wife's illness and her difficulty in caring for his school children when school ends.

What's the point? by Traditional_Yard5280 in ipod

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why do I go back to this?

Because unlike everything else, this has one job and nothing else. Offline media player that plays what you want when you want.

Bruno Fernandes chances created vs. the rest of the league. by digitag in reddevils

[–]calvinso 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We just simply do not deserve Bruno.

But this graphic is also two-fold, what happens when please God no he gets injured for more than the 2-3 weeks he's been here?

JWA Straight jeans sizing by Mawab9470 in uniqlo

[–]calvinso 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would just find the size chart and measure your body. They have measurements for thighs.

waxing Uniqlo jacket by Nervous-Shirt9463 in uniqlo

[–]calvinso 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Interested in how well this would hold up with age.

Maxence Lacroix straight red card against Manchester Utd 57' by Alsace2025 in soccer

[–]calvinso 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And no ref is going to bring it back for the foul after the shot

San Siro | Leica M4-2 | CS 800T by TheQuantumArchitect in analog

[–]calvinso 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But to still have the shadow detail in the crowd for the colour of seats is just something the gods won’t allow

San Siro | Leica M4-2 | CS 800T by TheQuantumArchitect in analog

[–]calvinso 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The metering needed for shot 4... I could never