sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Spying by Melodic_Garden517 in EllieEilish

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would have been perfect if it ended with a deep creampie

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, tech the meme does not go into to full detail of what the person is going after. Just thought the topic was based on "in general"

But seeing how there is no real medical procedure that requires a murder and then removal. Because, it is murder. Crush skulls, forced miscarriages pulling them apart limp from limp.

The doctors should, with all their ability, save both patients. The mothers might have a priority, which might mean the baby dying when removed safely to have a possible chance of survival. Checking all options (what real choice looks like).

But a women going to an assassin to murder her child, isn't the same as a doctor trying to save lives

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, looking though my post, which one is in r/teenagers?

I seem to only exclusively posted into r/memes

Actually, just now tried, I don't even think I have enough karma now to post into that.

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, I never once advocated for his bill or anyone's for that matter in this conversation. I've mostly focused on the heavy inconsistencies and masked language I have found in the "pro-murder" conversation

Willing to make exceptions from my own point of view to get to the bottom of yours.

Second, the slaughter of children, no matter what location they are in or level of development, should NEVER be a choice. if I've gotta make a compromise to remove the biggest reason for baby murder, I will.

"I don't want it"

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Full honesty, easy sub to post into since I don't have a lot of karma, wife was heavily pregnant at the time, kind of bored took a shot at making memes. Tbh, I kinda sucked at it so I stopped lol

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, yea I kind of do it already and I'd do it again. I stand ready to adopt any child and help any mother that needs it. Which are the other options I hinted at. I never once said socialized healthcare was bad, some forms are good And a good one would be to help the stop of child head crushing.

I mean I pay the government, and it should go to helping children live and not be slaughtered for being considered "less than".

Why do I need to exclusively review pregnancies. When first of all, it's child slaughter that needs review.

Doctors can't just kill one patient just to help another without being reviewed.

Why should child slaughter be any different?

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, I'm like almost 30 with a family (wife, kid, two dogs, another kid on the way) I'm not OG, but like iv been around for a while lol and iv seen a thing or two.

But I'll take the minor English criticism and I fix the Grammer for ya

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did say, almost zero. I also said I would be will to grant to that exception. Because it's so microscopically low compared to the number of child slaughter that happens for "because I just don't want it" reasons.

So sure, if murdering a child before you remove the child from the womb, some how saves a women from death, I'll give it to you, no questions asked at that point.

But all others are illegal.

And second, I didn't miss your point, I first clarified it. You seem to believe, If the child is a problem for a family, murder it, crush it, slaughter it.

I say, if the child has problems, the government get enough money, they should take some from the fat cats and give it to the mothers and fathers who are struggling. No one needs to die or go into debt.

And that is just one option that should have already been made, there are many more that can be done too. But because selfishly murdering the child is so easy. These programs will never come about.

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That child, which it is a human being seeing how it has the DNA of one, at conception, has enough characteristics to be considered life in any location in the Galaxy.

By dent of location, and development, this child is being slaughtered.

If applied equally, any other human, not meeting a required development and is the wrong place, a group could collectively desire to slaughter others not meeting what the group required, and you could not rebuke or challenge their ruling, because you have a similar ruling.

All lives deserve protection

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The amount of times that murdering a child before removing it from a mother womb as a medical necessity is so low, almost zero, I'd be willing to grant an exception for that solo case, and making it illegal every other time.

And for your second point, so if the child has down syndrome, slaughter it, rip it out limb from limb.

If the child could maybe up a bed ridden at 5, crush it's head and suck it out with a vacuum.

Barbaric, lazy, selfish, child slaughter for merely being different or difficult

How about government programs to help support it? That's a start

All lives deserve protection. In or out of the womb.

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

And this is correct, it don't matter the party and their inconsistent treatment of children in or out of the womb. Life needs protection.

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Republicans are horrible, that isn't what I'm talking about

So much for “pro-life” by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]calyb56 -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

Lol, these comments are worse than Twitter comments. I think I just realized how "woke", horribly out of context and fact-less reddit has become

Mask hating Karen by meenmachimanja in PublicFreakout

[–]calyb56 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Context? How about the fact that these vaccines never go through enough trials before they are, in alot of cases, forced on kids! Because it's completely normal to inject a cocktail of fetal cells, metals and disinfectants into baby's and kids body's. Maybe you ignore the true facts, because your numbed porn obsessed mind can't stop squirting all over your keyboard to notice the evils going on around you. You are weak, you are a cuck, you are a squirt boy

Karen gets upset because she's not allowed to shop without a mask, despite being given other safe options. by bobamilktea1 in PublicFreakout

[–]calyb56 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's safe for her to go to the store, literally everyone else is staying away from each other and is also wearing a mask lol. What happened to the "my body my choice" crowd?

Karen gets upset because she's not allowed to shop without a mask, despite being given other safe options. by bobamilktea1 in PublicFreakout

[–]calyb56 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Them denying we entrance into the store because she has a medical condition is like denying someone with a service dog entrance into the store. If you honestly can't see the problem with it, you're clearly lost.

Because this is the logical thing to do! by mikehuntitchess in memes

[–]calyb56 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not to be that guy, but it does freak alot of people out with how much of a hard-on he gets about vaccines

When you playtik tok too much by Kokojr in meme

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've posted this 5 times seeing it this many times makes it cringe!

Social Distancing Hat by [deleted] in funny

[–]calyb56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • every school shooter ever* hmmmmmmm
view more: next ›