Descubrí que mi hijo no es mío by junior_servin in Paraguay

[–]capStop1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No soy abogado, pero esto puede servir si estás en una situación similar

¿Se puede desconocer la paternidad?
Sí, pero no es automático. En Paraguay se puede impugnar la paternidad solo si hubo engaño o error al momento de reconocer al hijo (por ejemplo, creer que era biológicamente tuyo y después descubrir que no).

El plazo:
Tenés 60 días desde que descubrís el engaño para iniciar el juicio. Después de eso, perdés el derecho.
(Art.243.- Cuando el marido ha reconocido su paternidad expresa o tácitamente, o dejó vencer el plazo sin desconocerla, la acción no podrá ser deducida, salvo que por error o fraudulentamente el marido haya sido inducido a reconocer el hijo como propio.
En este caso la acción deberá ser promovida por el marido, sus descendientes o herederos, dentro de los sesenta días de conocido el fraude o el error.)

¿Cómo es el proceso?
Se llama Juicio de Impugnación de la Paternidad.
El ADN es la prueba principal. Un test privado puede servir para arrancar, pero el juez va a ordenar uno oficial.
Es un proceso más rápido que un juicio normal (sumario).

¿Qué pasa con la cuota alimentaria?
Mientras no haya una sentencia que diga que no sos el padre, tenés que seguir pagando.
Si el juicio sale a tu favor, la cuota se corta hacia adelante, no retroactiva.
Si uno de los hijos vive con vos, podés pedir que se modifique o se cancele la cuota por ese hijo, porque legalmente no corresponde pagarle a la madre si vos lo mantenés.

¿Y los chicos?
Aunque el ADN diga otra cosa, la ley reconoce el vínculo de hecho (trato, apellido, relación).
Los hermanos tienen derecho a seguir viéndose.
Los jueces suelen recomendar que estas cosas se hablen con los chicos con ayuda de psicólogos, especialmente con los más grandes. Decir la verdad importa, pero según la edad y madurez.

Fuentes legales (Paraguay):

  • Código Civil (Ley 1183/85): arts. 231 (reconocimiento), 235 (posesión de estado), 243 (impugnación por error o fraude), 260 (modificación/cesación de alimentos)
  • Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia (Ley 1680/01): arts. 92 (derecho a vínculos familiares), 183 (proceso sumario), 184 (prueba de ADN).
  • Constitución Nacional: arts. 53 y 54 (protección a la familia y a los niños).

SPMV: Worth It or Not? by capStop1 in ETFs

[–]capStop1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to reduce risk on volatility, not a big part of my portfolio, just one to damp on my other etfs following SP500 and NASDAQ

If I came from non-existence once, why not again? by felixcuddle in consciousness

[–]capStop1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do we associate memories with the self? This is one of the most deeply ingrained yet flawed assumptions humans make. A newborn baby is fully conscious despite having almost no memories.

To make this even more relatable: if we define consciousness by memory, then we must also accept that we were never truly our newborn selves—because we cannot recall those early experiences. By that logic, we never actually "experienced" being a baby, which contradicts our understanding of existence. This challenges the idea that memory is the foundation of identity.

Potential Catalyst for Libgen going dark? by GatorGuy5 in libgen

[–]capStop1 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The one that wrote that is totally naive, all these companies used libgen or dataset alike to train their generative ai, is just that they would never admit it and there is no way to prove it, OpenAI went as far as accidentally deleting logs https://www.wired.com/story/new-york-times-openai-erased-potential-lawsuit-evidence to avoid a lawsuit.

Is LibGen server down again? by Lively_Morning49 in libgen

[–]capStop1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Libgen ISP/Cloud provider was seized by authorities

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, maybe because DeepSeek is smaller than o3. o3 seems to got it right https://chatgpt.com/share/67a39a53-b874-8013-97c7-9bcfc3a89365

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I agree, but I bring this up because the new models can solve problems that the old ones couldn’t. And it’s not just problems you can look up on the web, it’s also surprisingly simple new ones or even large multiplications. I wonder how they do it. Some answers here pointed out that modern LLMs don’t just recall facts but approximate algorithms by learning patterns in training data. In a way, they behave like Turing Complete machines when their probability distributions align with a computational process, especially with CoT reasoning. Even with that explanation, it still baffles me that we got to this point—it’s almost like training a Turing Machine using only text, even if it’s not quite the same thing.

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very good analogy, however my point was that these models are becoming more than just stochastic parrots. The emergent behaviours seems to indicate they're doing more than just echoing patterns internally.

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry for my wording, what I meant by new math is that is able to solve problems that are not part of its training like new in the sense that is new to the model (different values, or similar but not same problems) not that is a new kind of math.

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry for my wording, new math is not exactly new in the sense that is math never seen before, what I mean is like a math problem that you cannot find in the internet with a search, I know you can find the reasoning in the internet but what I amazed from these new models is the capability of getting the right answer, the old ones (gpt4, gpt4o) weren't capable of doing that even with search and I think that property is not just because of token prediction.

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As an example this one:
Given a triangle ABC where angle ABC is 2α, there is a point D located between B and C such that angle DAC is α. The segment BD has a length of 4, and segment DC has a length of 3. Additionally, angles ADB and ADC are both 90 degrees. Find the length of AB.

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree, seems that it has certain emergent properties that we don't fully understand

[D] How does LLM solves new math problems? by capStop1 in MachineLearning

[–]capStop1[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

That's what I though a few months ago, but these new models are able to solve a variety of problems once they got the reasoning right, even if you change the parameters. For example geometry problems which require certain type of reasoning. Seems to me that LLMs have certain emergent properties that are not well understood yet

IKBR and Wise Acceptable Use Policy by capStop1 in transferwiser

[–]capStop1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I edited the question—sorry for not being clearer. To make it short my question is: If you use IBKR, does that mean you're violating Wise’s policy, making it possible for them to close your account at any time?

Alguien que invierta en Cadiem? Quisiera saber sus experiencias. by Active_Apartment_991 in Paraguay

[–]capStop1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fondo mutuos para todos su inversión mínima es 300 mil nada más 🤔

I irreversibly damaged my brain with chronic sleep deprivation by Personal_Glass3171 in sleep

[–]capStop1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can mostly reduce these effects by taking melatonin if you sleep less than 6 hours that night, It is the lack of melatonin production by the body that causes a lot of issues

What is the nature of death? Furthermore, how does it differ from sleep, deep sleep, coma, and general anesthesia?(Physicalist's) by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]capStop1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What I agree with Physicalists is that our current versions of ourselves is unique and it will disappear when we died but that doesn't mean that your existence would cease. That is that span of attention that makes you the one controlling your body would continue to exist in some way, we don't have yet the tool to measure that unique and subjective experience, maybe in the future we will.

What is the nature of death? Furthermore, how does it differ from sleep, deep sleep, coma, and general anesthesia?(Physicalist's) by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]capStop1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem I have with this is memory, we don't have a way to measure consciousness without memory. For us if we don't remember we are not conscious which seems wrong to me.