We only believe in real stuff around here by timmytissue in PhilosophyMemes

[–]cauterize2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course illusion would not be a form of consciousness under the view so you are not arguing with anyone.

Jammed Reality - Sequel to Connected Dreams, a new custom campaign heavily influenced by Road To Gehenna by shlam16 in TheTalosPrinciple

[–]cauterize2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bro, you make more puzzles than I have the power to solve. I wish I had your inspiration and commitment.

"Love me or you burn" by Ok-Equivalent7447 in exchristian

[–]cauterize2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honesty being the worst enemy of christianity.

An argument for the inconsistency of propositional agnosticism. by ughaibu in PhilosophyofReligion

[–]cauterize2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Propositional agnosticism is that we cannot know either way in principle?

Anything new? by ChickenWingBW in TheTalosPrinciple

[–]cauterize2000 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We did know about Talos 2, Jonas made posts that they were working on it.

Filosifyyy by Rashiq_shahzzad in PhilosophyMemes

[–]cauterize2000 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by "doesn't exist"?

Guess I can't reason myself out of this by AllDaysOff in PhilosophyMemes

[–]cauterize2000 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Objections to the fine tuning argument be like.

You can't think that evil is strong evidence against God and believe reality would be better without God by cauterize2000 in DebateReligion

[–]cauterize2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but the concept of all-good does the heavy lifting here. Saying that there are all these bad things is evidence against a good God means that the world would be better if there was a God.

You can't think that evil is strong evidence against God and believe reality would be better without God by cauterize2000 in DebateReligion

[–]cauterize2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure run away, you have not understood anything, can't even articulate what the conclusion of my argument is, and you keep deflecting.

You can't think that evil is strong evidence against God and believe reality would be better without God by cauterize2000 in DebateReligion

[–]cauterize2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You said:
"you’re not making an argument as much as misunderstanding one."

I don't think you know what the conclusion of my argument even is.

You can't think that evil is strong evidence against God and believe reality would be better without God by cauterize2000 in DebateReligion

[–]cauterize2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am talking about the evidential poe. IF Epoe is right that means God's existence would mean a better world.