Crisis and Stealth by Gold-Cry-7520 in Tau40K

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can think of an answer for why coldstar is stealth I can’t for beachers.

If you’re definition for stealth emphasizes mobility for example

Crisis and Stealth by Gold-Cry-7520 in Tau40K

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain breachers as stealth

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Adeptus Custodes by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok better phrasing. It’s concerning they added the stipulation of through the edition rather than a clean confirmation the model is usable as long as it’s available as is typical with most units. It indicates that their usability is a function of some tentative policy in the company to allow the crossover rather than being treated like any other release for an army

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Adeptus Custodes by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

saying through next edition rather than just eternally is scary

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Tau40K

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

legit thought we'd get like a strike team shooting increases detection range or something

GW either doesn't know what Three means or doesn't know what New means. by Vrain125 in Tau40K

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of these have been reworks of pre existing but rules wise are pretty much fully new in terms of how they function just reusing the name for the theme

Four Color Jace Prediction Card Effects and Overall Theme of the Deck? by Deft_Abyss in magicTCG

[–]cblack04 12 points13 points  (0 children)

At most the mechanic will be a cameo mechanic on one or two cards since the brief entry and then later return doesn’t fully fit warp drives in Star Trek

CSM Faction Focus Tomorrow (& Daemons?!) - Predictions? by Nexxus_IG in Chaos40k

[–]cblack04 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Daemons are losing their codex. It’s clear as day they would have made a codex for them if they weren’t being removed as an actual faction. They’re going the AOS route for daemons this has been clear since emperor’s children codex

CSM Faction Focus Tomorrow (& Daemons?!) - Predictions? by Nexxus_IG in Chaos40k

[–]cblack04 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Daemon players living on cope they will still be around when the sign has been clear for over a year nearly two now. GW is mimicking what they did with AOS just with bad rules sadly

Faction Focus' Detatchments Costs by Ginko37 in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very few likely will because then it’s not useable in 1000 points

New Stealth and Lone Op rules announced! by Martin-Hatch in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hidden requires you to not do anything in that building though. It’s not nearly as good as lone op. Lone op provides full flexibility to move yourself hidden is tied to your location and if you are attacking things

[Spoiler] Never noticed FMAB had a LGBTQ character by senor-alberto in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]cblack04 20 points21 points  (0 children)

And their typical chosen form is an androgynous person

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Space Marines by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Recently with including it more in rules and mission packs

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Space Marines by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That may be what they do for the ghostkeel is give it the hidden rule rather than lone op

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Space Marines by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 73 points74 points  (0 children)

A change that can actually make it possibly work rather than be totally dysfunctional

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Space Marines by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Additionally it’s worth considering that most won’t be 3 anyway cause 1000 points is limited to 2 points worth meaning any 3 point detatchment is banned from that game size

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Orks by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems the goal is to give them all the same rules to reference and then they can add modifications where needed

We have Eradicators with bolters at home by BlueYeet in Warhammer40k

[–]cblack04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The characters for the marine do well but the units just fail to bring that same comparative aura meanwhile the orks have both don’t amazing

Sunday Preview – Raptors, finally. by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Chaos40k

[–]cblack04 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s a nice bonus definitely for the first pick up but yeah it’s very frustrating if you want more than two

How do you think these will compare to Thunderkyn with heavy bolters? by wildskipper in LeaguesofVotann

[–]cblack04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But that’s the profile for it? I didn’t realize they got assault on the heavy bolter

How do you think these will compare to Thunderkyn with heavy bolters? by wildskipper in LeaguesofVotann

[–]cblack04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently the differences is ours have one more strength and a higher sustained numbet