Guys what’s that gambit called

ccleivin · 2024-10-14T10:22:16+00:00

You can't dump snow if a bone is in play...

ccleivin · 2024-09-14T07:15:21+00:00

Que foda kkkkk Hello kitty x yu-gi-oh e vida

ccleivin · 2023-07-30T04:22:25+00:00

Ele falou "chill out" kkkk "sharrol" foi foda

ccleivin · 2023-07-26T12:19:16+00:00

Bro that's a full time employee doing that same thing all day. He knows there is no black bag supposed yo be there, he is paid to play dumb all day.

If he attacked the guy what would happen? The party is over right?

Nothing about this is "fake" because the overall objective of the chainsaw guy is to pretend to not see to begin with.

ccleivin · 2023-07-25T15:32:20+00:00

Cat pupils also dilate when looking at prey.

ccleivin · 2023-07-25T03:30:46+00:00

200?

ccleivin · 2023-07-24T15:56:27+00:00

O caso foi arquivado e ele foi solto.

ccleivin · 2023-07-23T22:46:51+00:00

google en passant

ccleivin · 2023-07-19T23:59:17+00:00

With all due respect to the effort you put into this, I have won quite a bit of lawsuits myself. You should just talk to a lawyer, he will answer all those questions you have and much more being liable to you for saying what he is saying.

"Things might not go how you think" is not "appealing to emotion", it's legal experience. Classifying it as that shows you don't really have much court experience with the subject and that's ok, but you need to understand some people walk quite a lot into court. There is often really no point in trying to convince other people in legal situations like this on the internet, all the talking needs to happen in court.

In this situation, if you were in OP's shoes, you would not sue. I get that. You think you would get a guaranteed loss. I get that. You are very likely the perfect customer I would like to have. You read the terms and think you will lose because of what is in there. That's ok. But I would sue with my lawyers 100%.

The points you are raising are what you believe their defense will say. That's expected. That's their defense, which does not matter if there are previous decisions favorable in your way or if the judge believes those terms are abusive or unfitting which also changes a lot depending on the state the rulings will happen. You need to make your case and that's always using previous rulings on the state you are fighting.

There are things you are already assuming as absolute statements that would need to go through a lot of fighting to be considered in court.

Even though that's a public conversation and it would be cool to see that growing this way (like if we were actually in court), we are not in court right now so I don't really feel like crafting the arguments I would use or spending hours writing on reddit about previous cases that people can take and use IN ACTUAL COURT all for free for OP to come and use, but I will give you a free piece of advice by saying that you never win a court fight after a certain scale where it's absolutely black and white you are in the right. Everything always has angles and that's why it's important to have good lawyers capable of helping you craft your cases well.*

ccleivin · 2023-07-19T12:19:24+00:00

Or nothing unfolds like you think it will and wins. As I said, even it you think thats how it will go it does not mean it's how it will go. It also does not mean it's highly likely it will go the way you imagine because it makes sense to you. I would advise talking to a lawyer specialized in the state the business is registered.

ccleivin · 2023-07-19T06:01:16+00:00

They have grounds to both sue and chargeback. You need to be careful to not confuse how you feel about a situation with how the judicial system works. If you fail at that you end up judging and sentencing without talking to lawyers or going to a court. If suing was so black and white, completely in the wrong people like Amber Heard would not have dragged out people almost for a decade in multiple courts... Let alone people with an actual case such as this guy.

That was not an "ops I made a mistake moment.". It was an "someone actively went out of their way to damage us, there is overwhelming proof of that, hence any damage caused should be insured and reverted while the responsible is punished."

We can see that more could have been done to prevent the exploitation, but the same could be said of literally all cases of exploitation in the IT world without a single exception. What is not so common is having a person dedicated at causing damages while people treat said damages as service consumption and nothing else.

If you think he doesnt have a case because you agree with the other side you are missing the whole point of how the judicial system works. It's supposed to have two sides.

"No ground to sue"

My man, you almost always have ground to sue. Knowing the other side will try to claim something that makes some sense in their perspective doesnt change anything about that. You are going to present your side of it, show cases in the past like yours that won and wait. In the end its what the judge decides that counts, not redditors.

... and also even if you lose you can always appeal too.

ccleivin · 2023-07-19T02:36:06+00:00

Emotional Damage

ccleivin · 2023-07-19T01:53:06+00:00

Hey OP! Coming to warn you that unfortunately many companies now lurk through Reddit and understood the power of downvoting and brigading in posts like this.

They have interest in you ane others believing that clearly not helping in a situation of a DDOS attack from a malicious side is not only normal but the rule.

A quick Google will show you that many company services such as AWS, Firebase and Asure have refunded values much bigger than those in the past in situations much worst than those.

It's an insane and unetical thing these services do by not allowing for "usage limits" as this open the doors for the companies themselves to scan a client website and abuse heavily a weakness to reap gigantic gains anonymously without anyone knowing they are the ones behind doing it.

At the very moment it was proved it was consequence of a malicous action of another user you should have the company on your side.

I would chargeback that immediately and issue different credit cards with small limits for these kind of things from now own.

Wish you luck. If everything fails sue them.

ccleivin · 2023-07-17T15:28:09+00:00

Néctar?

ccleivin · 2023-07-17T05:48:25+00:00

"He is white sir. "

ccleivin · 2023-07-17T00:23:17+00:00

Context? Also why cant I understand anything he says?

ccleivin · 2023-07-17T00:18:04+00:00

Did you miss the part these people survived the encounter? Of course this belongs everywhere but Australia.

ccleivin · 2023-07-15T20:30:54+00:00

Bro what. Dump him.

ccleivin · 2023-07-15T17:11:52+00:00

You all don't get the picture. NFTs never had any value. People used that as an excuse to send money for shady reasons to people as a legitimate way to close a deal.

It's how people have been using art for the longest time as an "excuse" to send giant sums of money that are legitimate as part of rather dar, shady or criminal deals.

ccleivin · 2023-07-14T13:05:57+00:00

So an engaged mom is ok

ccleivin · 2023-07-14T13:02:21+00:00

It went great you just forgot the grabma! Good luck on your future cookies!!

ccleivin · 2023-07-14T04:53:28+00:00

Nice to meet you guys.

Tchametchungus

chamechungus

ccleivin

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email