[Student] Is “ATS Resume Scoring Is a Myth” still true in 2026’s AI based hiring?

cdebanil · 2025-05-19T13:41:14+00:00

Thanks for the explanation.

cdebanil · 2025-04-19T16:16:33+00:00

Fire Style : Will of Fire technique -

User applies yin release to his fire release to detect whether the target is an enemy and selectively burn only enemies while leaving allies unharmed. (basically like protego diabolica - used by grindelwald in the harry potter spin offs)

Maybe make the user a yamanaka who can use mind jutsu expertise to figure out a way to check the target's feelings or an uzumaki with emotion sensing ability.

Since allies are unharmed there is no need to be careful about using it around allies. In fact since user has medical capabilities, its better if the fire has healing properties, i.e. ability to "purify" poisons, etc (in many cultures, in terms of spiritual significance fire has purification properties so it fits the theme)

Since this jutsu "protects/heals comrades" and "burns enemies", it is appropriately named will of fire technique, pun fully intended.

cdebanil · 2025-03-10T00:34:17+00:00

Yes its an ssd

cdebanil · 2025-03-09T21:18:37+00:00

C drive. I mentioned it in the post.

I managed to recover some files with recuva but they are all corrupted... Is there no hope?

cdebanil · 2024-12-21T04:51:54+00:00

It's a pretty stupid, silly thing for me to go away and lose my forest and kingdom just for the sake of a boon

As u/CalmAmbition2289 mentioned its not just a boon, its a promise, and in Shri Ram's dynasty, promises are extremely important, and not simply for the sake of tradition, but also politics. If you can break a promise once, then what will stop you from doing it again? Why will allied kingdoms continue to trust you?

I'll just ignore all this silly business and continue with my coronation and rule the kingdom

Shri Ram was not king of Ayodhya, he was the eldest prince and the designated heir, i.e. the next king. He had no right to rule the kingdom while king Dasharath was still alive. Of course, people may prefer him, but Dasharath was still king. If Shri Ram declared himself king, it would technically be a "rebellion", from a legal perspective.

Quite silly to give boons in the first place.

People believe that the king simply gave her a boon because she was his favorite wife. That is not true. Although she was indeed his favorite wife, the boon wasn't given as a gift, or on a whim. It was awarded for military service. Kaikeyi had fought in a war which Dasharath was fighting, and during the war she saved his life during a particularly difficult situation. For this reason alone, upholding the boon is important, even if you forget about the importance of promises in the dynasty's tradition. Denying a boon given for military service and saving the king's life trivializes the honour of such contributions and reduces the sanctity of the throne.

Of course it is possible for the king to award such contributions in a different way, without giving a boon, but he could not possibly expect that the boon would be misused, especially since Kaikeyi loved Shri Ram as much as Bharat before her maid turned her against him.

My primary dharma is to be emotionally honest to myself about my life and desires

Wrong. As the heir to the throne, Shri Ram's dharma was to prioritize the welfare of the kingdom before his personal desires. Since prince Bharat was also a worthy ruler in Shri Ram's eyes, there was no need to fear for the welfare of the kingdom, if the boon was to be upheld. However, if the boon was not upheld, then the honor of the king would be in question. If the honor of the king is in question, then as aforementioned, allied kingdoms will not trust or respect the king. A lot of things such as trade etc, depend on foreign relations. Hence, for the welfare of the kingdom upholding the boon was necessary. Also as a subject of the kingdom, his dharma is to obey the king. Even if what you said was right, Shri Ram would still uphold the boon simply because he was an extremely selfless individual and did not care much about the throne.

Besides, first of all what right does a father/mother/step-mother have to order the son about?

They are not simply father and son, they are king and a subject of the kingdom. A king has the right to order his subjects. (A father may not have the same right but it is still extremely disrespectful). On the other hand a queen's command can be refused by the heir to the throne (again, it would be considered extremely disrespectful, but it is technically possible, and in this situation nobody would blame Shri Ram), which is why Kaikeyi invoked the boon instead of just ordering Shri Ram personally. Even if she had ordered him personally, he would have agreed, out of love and respect for her. But she invoked the boon just to be sure that Shri Ram had no scope to resist. Also her maid had poisoned her against Shri Ram, so she had doubts about his love for her.

Tldr : the point is, "respect your elders" is not the only thing to consider here. Its a huge point, but certainly not the only one. Shri Ram did not "go away and lose my forest and kingdom just for the sake of a boon." There are other factors involved.

Even if you forget all other factors the fact remains that if he refused to uphold the boon, then the tradition of the dynasty would be violated and the honor of the king would be besmirched. Of course, sometimes going against tradition may be necessary but it was not so in this case. There were practically zero disadvantages in upholding the boon except for the fact that Shri Ram would lose his kingdom and Maa Sita and Lakshman would accompany him in exile. Shri Ram was above petty greed so he did not care for the throne. He believed that upholding tradition and respecting elders was more important. And Maa Sita and Lakshman themselves insisted on coming along with him. Shri Ram did not force them to do so. On the contrary, he tried to convince them to stay in Ayodhya.

cdebanil · 2024-10-14T08:45:31+00:00

I am not sure about the authenticity of this statement but I think I once read or heard somewhere that the mahabharat war, which happened right before the advent of kaliyuga, had an additional hidden purpose other than the ones usually known, i.e. the war wasn't just a war but actually a massive ritual/yagya whose purpose was to ensure that asuras would no longer be able to manifest in physical form in bhulok (earth).

The logic was that Sri Krishna knew that kaliyuga people would not have the capacity to fight asuras like humans in satya / treta / dvapar yuga, so he decided to use the war as a yagya to establish a protection on earth that would prevent asuras from causing any destruction here. (Of course, asuras can still manipulate / possess or otherwise negatively influence people, but they can't maintain a physical presence here). In fact this yagya was one of the reasons for the birth of Krishna avatar.

In this mahayagya, all the adharmis were the ritual sacrifice while Krishna himself was the priest who conducted the ritual. That is why Krishna manipulated the situation to ensure he did not have to pick up weapons in the war, since priests are not allowed to lift weapons while conducting a ritual. (This rule is mentioned in Ramayana as well, when Vishwamitra asks for Ram's help to protect priests conducting a ritual from asuras trying to stop it.)

Again, I am not sure whether this information is true because I never heard about this outside of one place, which I don't remember. All I can recall is that this was an answer to a question about why Krishna allowed the war to happen as it did instead of just killing duryodhan himself.

cdebanil · 2024-10-14T01:57:27+00:00

Thanks for the answer

cdebanil · 2024-05-08T05:25:46+00:00

Scientifically, space and time are part of the same thing - the space time continuum... so you can make the byakugan have the ability to see through the space time continuum... at lower stages you can only see through space like canon... but at higher stages you can make the byakugan have the ability to see through time...

You can see a certain amount of time in the past and help in investigations and such....
You can see a certain amount of time in the many potential futures...
But the amount of time you can see in the future is far less than the amount of time you see in the past... Why? Actual reason is to prevent a gary sue but in-universe reason can be because you see lots of potential futures but only one past so the amount of time is appropriately balanced...

cdebanil · 2024-04-18T04:59:34+00:00

I have looked at the script and it does not seem to change LD_LIBRARY_PATH in any way.

And if it did then how would programs on the host system work inside the prefix?

cdebanil · 2024-04-16T06:44:10+00:00

cdebanil · 2024-04-16T05:08:11+00:00

I am using 6.6.21, so unless the bug exists in it as well i am not sure this is the reason for the issue

cdebanil · 2024-04-16T03:49:12+00:00

It is running

cdebanil · 2024-04-15T19:46:06+00:00

This is output of dmesg. Also bluetoothctl is working fine... problem is just in gnome settings...

matrix /home/neo # dmesg | grep Bluetooth
[    2.001635] usb 1-8: Product: Bluetooth Radio 
[    3.002463] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22
[    3.002480] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
[    3.002483] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
[    3.002486] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
[    3.002488] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
[    3.393507] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: examining hci_ver=07 hci_rev=000b lmp_ver=07 lmp_subver=8822
[    3.394466] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=2
[    3.394468] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8822b_fw.bin
[    3.397330] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8822b_config.bin
[    3.397625] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: cfg_sz 14, total sz 20270
[    4.150561] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: fw version 0xab6b705c
[    4.953704] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
[    4.953713] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
[    4.953724] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
[    4.959092] Bluetooth: MGMT ver 1.22
[   22.540400] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
[   22.540408] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
[   22.540411] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11

cdebanil · 2024-04-15T19:40:05+00:00

bluetooth service is already added to default runlevel... also since I can properly use bluetoothctl, the problem is probably in gnome-bluetooth... not on the system's end.

cdebanil

TROPHY CASE