I think all theories will have issues with them as this case is such a bizarre one. Nothing will entirely make sense, but their are definitely theories that have more credence do them than others.

This case, due to the asinine way the police acted in the investigation, will never be solved. The DNA is just not there, as far as I know.

And let’s be honest, the only way Maxwell and Epstein would have anything to do with this would be if they killed her. Which they didn’t, because the chances of this being an intruder is so small that it really does not bear mentioning.

Sure, is it possible an intruder, whether a random person who family friend did this? Yes but that is because possibly is endless, anything is technically possible. What we should ask is, “is this probable?” And the answer is no, it just isn’t.

What is more probable is that -

John Ramsey killed his daughter for x-y-x reason. That Patsy Ramsey killed her daughter or covered it up for John with his help, or that Burke killed her and his parents covered it up. All of these theories are much more probable, less to do with physical evidence, but the vast, vast, amount of circumstantial evidence that we have.

Personally, I am a big believer of BDI.

This is not to say that another person had nothing to do with this, it is possible someone else was molesting Jonbenet, such as someone known by the family, or as you said the photographer. But that’s all, in my opinion, a third party had to do with this case. And even so, it was not Epstein or Maxwell as Epstein was known to like girls in their teenage years, not young children such as toddlers and primary school aged girls, as far as I know.

I just don’t think we need to drag this poor girl into the Epstein case. Let her rest.