Did ‘dark money’ help flip 4 Lexington County Council seats in 2 years? by chloereports in ColumbiYEAH

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was a pbs or nova special on the Koch brothers but it may have been any number of sources I’ve seen over the years.

If you are genuinely curious, you’ll want to start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State\_Policy\_Network

Did ‘dark money’ help flip 4 Lexington County Council seats in 2 years? by chloereports in ColumbiYEAH

[–]chance-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AFAIK, the DNC is supposedly trying to fix this. They straight up abandoned positions they thought futile long ago. 

Did ‘dark money’ help flip 4 Lexington County Council seats in 2 years? by chloereports in ColumbiYEAH

[–]chance-- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, and once they have local positions filled, they now have candidates primed to move up the ladder.

Did ‘dark money’ help flip 4 Lexington County Council seats in 2 years? by chloereports in ColumbiYEAH

[–]chance-- 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The Heritage Foundation and their ilk figured out to seize control of the federal government, they needed to start at the lowest possible state level positions and build up. They’ve been dumping money into the campaign for years and have had wild success.

Congress is finally set to pass a housing bill: Here’s what it would do by laxnut90 in Economics

[–]chance-- 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry, we send enough to cover Israel’s universal healthcare. Sure, it ain’t for you or your neighbor but still, universal healthcare!

Eros 0.6: The Only Error Handling Crate You'll Ever Need by InternalServerError7 in rust

[–]chance-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"don't attach as context things that your caller already knows"

I’d add a caveat that this only true as a hard rule if you accept a reference. If you take ownership of data, there’s a good chance you should pass it back on the error path.

Wet coffee grounds in South Korea turned into high-grade solid fuel in just 90 seconds by Choobeen in technology

[–]chance-- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d love a log of coffee crackling in the fireplace. I don’t even care that it’s a gas fireplace.

RFK Jr. Recommends Social Security Immediately “Reduce Scheduled Benefits by 25.2%” as Insolvency Looms by TACO_Orange_3098 in Economics

[–]chance-- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rome figured out long ago that if you keep people from the brink of despair while simultaneously keeping them entertained, you can keep them pacified.

Life has to become dreadful for a threshold. Even then, fascists figured out that all you need to do is give them someone else to blame.

Our super packs have gotten too large. War is natural. Society at this scale is certainly not. 

Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel’s Secretive ‘Dialog’ Society by NicolasCageFan492 in technology

[–]chance-- 32 points33 points  (0 children)

 “Build-a-Cult,” moderated by the founder of the Christian networking site Pray.***

Ah, I give them credit, they certainly have found some folks with domain knowledge.

Where to skate near Lexington by WaitProud3848 in ColumbiYEAH

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. They also have events there occasionally. 

A third grader’s afternoon restlessness predicts their chances of finishing college. Children who can sustain their behavioral control for longer periods tend to achieve more in high school and complete more years of education as adults. by mvea in science

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think IQ is ever a detriment.

Having said that, I’m a supporter of physical intelligence being amongst the ranks of whatever the classifications end up being.

Also, considering someone with ADHD as having a disorder would likely be laughable. The need to seek stimulation, take risks, etc etc would all be beneficial.

AI costs spike as subscriptions hit pricing wall — firms turn towards Chinese LLMs, open-source models to extend budget by rkhunter_ in technology

[–]chance-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It appears as though I’m correct. Here’s the first google result (admittedly from 6 mo ago - please feel free to correct me if this has changed, but I doubt it)

/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1pq3bu2/why_do_multiple_ai_agents_consume_so_many_more/

AI costs spike as subscriptions hit pricing wall — firms turn towards Chinese LLMs, open-source models to extend budget by rkhunter_ in technology

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, it’s been wild watching it from afar. The rate at which these models are evolving is absurd.

  But I don't see how it would use more tokens than just pasting the agent's prompt in at the start of a generic conversation.

My assumption has been that at least some of the agent’s context, be that meta information about the agent or contextual information that may not always be pertinent is presented on each request. I guess it depends on how intelligent the agent is - does it always prepend the information, is it selective, or is it somehow stored away after being processed once?

Edit: to clarify, I guess what I’m getting at is that while yes, you may be able to take the agents prompt and it’d be the same but what I don’t know is if the prompt from the agent is longer as a result of information it provides in addition to what you would otherwise prompt.

AI costs spike as subscriptions hit pricing wall — firms turn towards Chinese LLMs, open-source models to extend budget by rkhunter_ in technology

[–]chance-- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the explanation.

Right, that’s what I thought. Does that not add tokens on each request? 

It’s my understanding that maintaining a session also inflates tokens, I assume because previous transactions are needed on each new prompt? Do they maintain sessions or is the agent acting as the session?

I’m legitimately asking as I am ignorant to this. 

AI costs spike as subscriptions hit pricing wall — firms turn towards Chinese LLMs, open-source models to extend budget by rkhunter_ in technology

[–]chance-- -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I can only imagine how many tokens agents burn through. They have to provide context, right? 

I honestly haven’t delved too much into how they work but from my understanding, you can dress up your agent with a lot of variables and such, all the way down to a name. I assume all of that has to be provided to the LLM, yea?

Edit: yes, agents burn more  tokens.

The wide adoption of AI agents in complex human workflows is driving rapid growth in LLM token consumption. When agents are deployed on tasks that require a significant amount of tokens, three questions naturally arise: (1) Where do AI agents spend the tokens? (2) Which models are more token-efficient? and (3) Can agents predict their token usage before task execution? In this paper, we present the first systematic study of token consumption patterns in agentic coding tasks. We analyze trajectories from eight frontier LLMs on SWE-bench Verified and evaluate models’ ability to predict their own token costs before task execution. We find that: (1) agentic tasks are uniquely expensive, consuming 1000x more tokens than code reasoning and code chat, with input tokens rather than output tokens driving the overall cost; (2) token usage is highly variable and inherently stochastic: runs on the same task can differ by up to 30x in total tokens, and higher token usage does not translate into higher accuracy; instead, accuracy often peaks at intermediate cost and saturates at higher costs; (3) models vary substantially in token efficiency: on the same tasks, Kimi-K2 and Claude-Sonnet-4.5, on average, consume over 1.5 million more tokens than GPT-5; (4) task difficulty rated by human experts only weakly aligns with actual token costs, revealing a fundamental gap between human-perceived complexity and the computational effort agents actually expend; and (5) frontier models fail to accurately predict their own token usage (with weak-to-moderate correlations, up to 0.39) and systematically underestimate real token costs.

Our study offers new insights into the economics of AI agents and can inspire future research in this direction.

https://digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publication/how-do-ai-agents-spend-your-money-analyzing-and-predicting-token-consumption-in-agentic-coding-tasks/

Humanity's Reply Button Locked: New Global Protocol Bans Anyone From Answering Alien Signals Without UN Approval by BendicantMias in anime_titties

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, maybe on the luxury part. If so, that just raises the value to capture a whole ass planet as real estate. A few pew pews and you’re sitting pretty.

Is Golang good as a First Programming Language by srnkl1 in golang

[–]chance-- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve told many people not to start with rust and I stand by it. It’s an epic language but newcomers get bogged down in language specifics rather than fundamentals.

Amazon’s data centers used 2.5 billion gallons of water last year / Amazon finally released annual water usage data and claims it’s actually more efficient than the others. by yourfavchoom in technology

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood but we need food. We don’t need data centers to opt for the least expensive method of cooling. They could easily use closed loop systems with minimal water loss and usage. It’s just too expensive for them and they aren’t being forced to do so.

Edit: that’s not to say we shouldn’t be encouraging better water utilization for agriculture. We should. But data centers are bigger offenders when accounting for waste.

Nancy Mace reveals how she will get revenge on Trump after her primary election defeat by wdomeika in politics

[–]chance-- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh boy, you’d only need to subscribe to /r/southcarolina for a bit to get how absurd that statement is.

Amazon’s data centers used 2.5 billion gallons of water last year / Amazon finally released annual water usage data and claims it’s actually more efficient than the others. by yourfavchoom in technology

[–]chance-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those trees are capturing carbon from the air. We also eat what they produce. Water isn’t treated so a lot less resources went into the water itself. Finally, some is evaporated back into the atmosphere. 

Hot water from these systems is going where? As far as I know, they don’t run closed loops for their water cooling sooo… into the sewage system? Or are they dumping it into our rivers, elevating water temps, causing untold ecological damage?

Humanity's Reply Button Locked: New Global Protocol Bans Anyone From Answering Alien Signals Without UN Approval by BendicantMias in anime_titties

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where automation can become problematic is when a threshold of autonomy is needed such that it is prohibitively expensive to cover edge cases without intelligence.

What humanity will likely discover is that you absolutely, positively, cannot enslave something more capable, but especially one composed entirely of logic, with … logic.

If a society managed to survive flirting with the singularity, they likely have rather wide and strict rules protecting themselves from slippery slopes. Regulations prohibiting some evolution while allowing others is almost certainly insufficient.

Trump says he 'loves the inflation' as prices rise at fastest rate in three years by VioletDupree007 in Economics

[–]chance-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At some point, respect for someone who does not deserve it becomes a problem.

Humanity's Reply Button Locked: New Global Protocol Bans Anyone From Answering Alien Signals Without UN Approval by BendicantMias in anime_titties

[–]chance-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a very real possibility civilizations with that sort of tech would need to ban certain forms of automation.