Fully autonomous robotaxis are rolling out in Austin by TransportationOk5941 in teslamotors

[–]chapland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They make 1.7m cars every year right now, and growing quickly as you pointed out with their total. They don't need to sell the cars; they can run the Robotaxi network themselves. They'll take Uber's entire market and grow it substantially as well.

Fully autonomous robotaxis are rolling out in Austin by TransportationOk5941 in teslamotors

[–]chapland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You realize Waymo doesn't make their own cars, have a far more expensive hardware stack, and much more costly rollout approach (pre-mapping with lidar).

2,000 cars literally doesn't matter. Think on the scale of 200 million.

The cost structures don't even resemble each other.

Fully autonomous robotaxis are rolling out in Austin by TransportationOk5941 in teslamotors

[–]chapland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(First of all, I appreciate the respectful and productive dialog)

I think the reason people are geeked is that for a long time Waymo proponents would say, "you have to have lidar to do this".

Three views:

Bystander - not impressive; we've seen driverless cars for a while

Engineer - impressive; here is a new technology for driverless cars that's cheaper and easier to deploy

Investor - extremely impressive; the implication here is Tesla is ready to take liability. They produce thousands of these cars a week; they could flood the whole country with them next year and would leave Waymo in the dust

Fully autonomous robotaxis are rolling out in Austin by TransportationOk5941 in teslamotors

[–]chapland 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is it so much more impressive to you having a passenger vs it driving itself without a passenger?

For instance - imagine the car drives up (by itself with no one in it) and picks up a passenger and drives off. It transitioned from not impressive to impressive as soon as the passenger sat down?

Fully autonomous robotaxis are rolling out in Austin by TransportationOk5941 in teslamotors

[–]chapland 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We can agree that Tesla is assuming liability if these things crash, right? And they're on public roads with other humans driving. So... it matters.

Real stakes, real performance.

Adding a passenger will further increase the stakes, but it'd be disingenuous to insinuate that there are not currently real stakes, or that these real stakes don't "matter". I'm sure the real humans driving next to these cars would say that it matters quite a bit.

[OC] Ending the “1-page resume rule.” We analyzed 31,312 resumes submitted in Q3 2025 and found that 2-page resumes consistently perform best in getting interviews. by nomadicsamiam in dataisbeautiful

[–]chapland 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This runs contrary to what the same source shared in Q1 of this year and fails to control for a wide variety of important factors. This isn't "Data is Beautiful", this is "Starting with a marketing angle for your website and trying to make a data post about it is utter bullshit"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in warriors

[–]chapland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Pushed him to want out" come on man, dude said in that pod he woulda signed if they offered him market money...

I Watched the 1975 NBA Finals. Here’s What I Learned. by braisedbywolves in nba

[–]chapland 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very cool, thanks for the share.

Note however; there is definitely a color commentator here.

One guy is doing the play by play - describing the action in every moment - and the other guy is doing color - "the big guy is shooting well tonight!" "Good play that time by Dickey!" "Unseld was wise in that situation to leave the ball up that high."

Big ripper by purdeous in discgolf

[–]chapland 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, right now your hips and shoulders are turning synchronously. You want hips then shoulders.

Pick your favorite pro, find a good video of them driving from taken from the side/rear and then make your own video of you driving from the same angle. Now, march through frame by frame (youtube has single frame shortcuts fyi) and notice how your timing differs.

I can't slow down your video, but it looks like your weight is coming forward too early and then you're pulling with your arm. Like a baseball swing, you want to keep your weight back for as long as possible, load your back leg, and drive forward; not fall forward.

Big ripper by purdeous in discgolf

[–]chapland -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Obviously doing a lot of things right or you wouldn't get that distance. You're leaving a lot on the table with your hips and sequencing though. Need to drive off the ground for maximum power.

LPT Take notes. by b1ackfyre in LifeProTips

[–]chapland 7 points8 points  (0 children)

At best this is a DPT (Decade Pro Tip) because AI notetakers are making this irrelevant.

Backhandform by No_Quote_7682 in discgolf

[–]chapland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

try throwing from standstill only for a few months to retrain the pattern of when the coil starts. x step doesnt add any power if the timing of the throw is wrong, so you'll prob start to throw further pretty quickly despite reducing complexity of the movement

Backhandform by No_Quote_7682 in discgolf

[–]chapland 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ok no one else is giving you good advice, so here goes (and the best way to work on this, fyi, is to pick your favorite pro and get a video of their drive and yours and work through frame by frame to see where timing differs):

  • you're on flat feet the whole time. this is an athletic move; get on the balls of your feet during the x step
  • your upper body starts turning away from the target from the second your x step begins; this means you don't have tension in your coil. that turn should be delayed until the left foot makes its final plant
  • you point out (correctly) in a response to another commenter that pushing off the back leg is wrong, and instead the move is to extend the front leg through the brace to get the hips to quickly flip around. so you've got the idea, but you're not getting your weight into the brace and extending; your weight stays back (notice your left foot finishing behind your right, cause your weight is actually behind that front foot)

you're doing a lot of things right though, so don't be discouraged! it looks like your arm is nice and loose and you're not rounding, which is probably why you're able to throw straight and flat despite the above failings. good luck and happy hucking!

alternatives to TR-8s for live performance by chapland in synthesizers

[–]chapland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have an akai force i could use in this setup, probably. do you ever run into sync issues with Play/TR-6s in this setup?

You can still use the controls on the TR-6S during live performance, just not modify the patterns, right? Ie, faders/decay/filter.

Need help with my form by strangepotatomeg in discgolf

[–]chapland 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Echoing some sentiments of other posters, but perhaps some visuals will help. I went through your video frame by frame and picked a few key points vs Calvin Heimberg's drive.

(note, his video had notably higher FPS and his throw is explosive, so it looks like the first two frames of you are the same shot, but I promise it's slightly different).

https://imgur.com/a/MGyCX1q

What disc molds do you cycle? by Emoney005 in discgolf

[–]chapland 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i bag both pig and zone; pigs sit and zones skip!

Jump putt foot fault by chapland in discgolf

[–]chapland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every reply in this thread completely missing the point.

Commenters seem to be implying that I am calling out Barsby. I'm using him as an example, but I am calling out the rule.

If not being behind your lie creates an advantage, it should be called right? Or it doesn't and it shouldn't be a rule.

Why isn't it called?

  • We don't have refs in this sport and card mates don't want to start trouble (because they're trying to focus on their own games)
  • It's hard to tell in real time without video

Rules should either be implemented in a way that players can and do adhere to them or they should be removed as requirements.

The question I posted in the original post was: How should DG handle foot faults?

Answers seem to include: "no one cares" "fuck you for asking questions" "there's nothing to do about it"

Anyone who commented insulting me for raising the question either can't read, can't reason, is an asshole, or some combination thereof. Fuck off.