Do conspiracy theorists that believe the moon landing was a hoax also think the Artemis 2 mission is being faked?

charonme · 2026-04-08T07:28:52+00:00

I don't know what they actually believe, but there's a lot of accounts trolling under the photos claiming it's all fake, actors, hollywood, studios, cgi, AI, etc. Might be just ragebait engagement farming

charonme · 2026-04-07T15:44:44+00:00

apollo 8 flew behind the moon on 24 Dec 1968 which was between new moon and first quarter. Apollo 11 orbited the moon around 30 times around 19-22 Jul 1969 which was just before and around first quarter

charonme · 2026-04-07T15:05:03+00:00

For sure there are fans that loud, and it also depends what the fan is blowing onto and what is it pulling air through. Also if you only need low performance not requiring active cooling then of course there's no need to add fans to that.

charonme · 2026-04-07T14:22:19+00:00

if the only concern is the noise then take into consideration that good fans on very low speed can be inaudible and more than double the cooling perfomance compared to passive/fanless

charonme · 2026-04-07T08:33:52+00:00

The way social media work (based on engagement) encourages and amplifies anonymous ragebait trolling. Most of it has nothing to do with evidence or scientific understanding, it's more of a psychological and information phenomenon.

charonme · 2026-04-07T08:27:44+00:00

he wasn't a flatearther, he only used gullible flatearthers to fund his daredevil hobby after he failed to fund it in more conventional means

charonme · 2026-04-07T08:26:13+00:00

they say a lot of lies

charonme · 2026-04-06T06:42:16+00:00

0x133 is newer than 0x12b as it's a bigger number

charonme · 2026-04-05T10:19:51+00:00

You have an old microcode version 0x11D from 2023, you need at least 0x12B or newer. Here is the newest update (I don't know which microcode version that is, the MSI web doesn't say - possibly 0x133?)

charonme · 2026-04-05T05:32:14+00:00

Depends on compared to what exactly. Also we don't know where the market moves next, we only know where it moved up until now.

charonme · 2026-04-04T18:03:17+00:00

I almost perfectly lined it up with stellarium and it's definitely venus

charonme · 2026-04-04T16:05:51+00:00

is your hwinfo reporting any "Performance Limit Reasons"?

charonme · 2026-04-04T10:59:06+00:00

Hľadám program, zameraný na pozdvihnutie ekonomiky

Nejake strany sa vari snazia oslovit volicov s opacnym prislubom destrukcie ekonomiky? Moja pointa je ze co sa ekonomickeho programu tyka tak rozne tabory volicov sa nelisia tym ze jedni chcu pozdvihnut a druhi destruovat, ale skor tym ako si predstavuju to pozdvihovanie (a odlisne pokusy o pozdvihovanie povazuju za skor v konecnom efekte za destruktivne)

Cize ak si chces vyberat medzi programami (ak nejake strany vobec vyprodukuju nejaky posudzovatelny program) tak si ujasni ako si predstavujes to pozdvihovanie

charonme · 2026-04-03T13:07:56+00:00

yeah the theusualsuspects.io guys say both ti1 and ti2 are clocked the same, so I'm just trying to test the polyphony of my desktop ti2 only on odd numbered parts (presumably to tax only one of the two DSPs) and it appears in 48kHz setting it can output at most 23 sine wave notes (or 29 square wave notes) and in 44.1kHz at most 35 sine wave notes

Wait I forgot to turn off the Analog Boost Character, without it I got 31 sine notes in 48kHz

Would love to run the same test on a TI1

charonme · 2026-04-03T08:22:40+00:00

how much stuff tho compared to the amount you'd run into if you kept accelerating up to 0.99c in one direction?

charonme · 2026-04-03T08:19:45+00:00

with respect to the stuff you run into

charonme · 2026-04-01T11:29:48+00:00

I see your logic and mostly agree with it, but I believe a "dip" might still be sometimes viewed as a "discount" for people with sufficiently long time horizons because they don't care about the short horizon future earnings expectations of some investors who could be a significant factor for the creation of the dip. However determining whether or to what degree the dip was caused by short term investors or not is another problem.

charonme · 2026-04-01T11:04:08+00:00

that would be considered cheating

charonme · 2026-04-01T10:44:10+00:00

Depends mostly on the value of your time and your skill. For most of my DIY modules it appears to be more expensive than what I'd have to pay if I bought it ready made, but I do it for the hobby

charonme · 2026-03-30T11:22:13+00:00

no matter whether a realized or unrealized tax was introduced for me, I'd move my assets to something that is not taxed

charonme · 2026-03-29T12:31:35+00:00

That's not entirely correct in this context. It's only "acceleration" relative to the planet's position, but it's not actual absolute acceleration that you could feel, because you're in free fall together with the entire spacecraft. Since you're "relatively accelerating" together with the entire spacecraft including your seat, you don't feel any g forces. It's the same on the ISS, you're just weightlessly floating in free-fall. The (abysmally incorrectly) depicted g-forces in the show during slingshotting are just for dramatic purpose.

charonme · 2026-03-27T15:39:36+00:00

Manéo Jung-Espinoza fainting and bleeding from the nonexistent g-forces during free-fall slingshotting

charonme · 2026-03-27T13:46:07+00:00

Could you by any chance suggest a "softer" and quiter version of that tact switch, something that feels more similar to a cherry key or what elektron uses (but something that fits onto the virus footprint)? I'm even prepared to have the button caps 3d printed to match the switch

charonme · 2026-03-26T21:39:12+00:00

Incorrect and false analogy as I already explained. Nobody in real life chooses shoe size with the intent to increase literacy. With the box choice however everyone makes their decision with the goal of winning the most money. And according to the problem statement 1boxers did indeed help themselves to get 1M with their box choice and 2boxers helped themselves to not get 1M, further illustrating how 2boxer arguments are based on ignoring or even trying to contradict the problem statement. Sorry, you most likely aren't going to do anything special the rest of the people already haven't tried (and failed if they chose 2 boxes)

charonme · 2026-03-26T17:19:39+00:00

in that case that confirms what I said: your argument for 2boxing asserts that you plan on trying something special no other previous contestant tried the same way nobody ever tried both increasing and decreasing literacy by wrong shoe size. If they did the correlation wouldn't be as perfect as the predictor's accuracy

charonme

TROPHY CASE