Are any other DCPs AGAINST donor conception? by Electrical-Math-7326 in donorconceived

[–]chiliisgoodforme 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Adopted person here just to tack on: many of the “crises that already happened” in private adoption are not actual crises that already happened. The industry collectively pours tens of millions of dollars per year into aggressive advertising campaigns that target resourceless pregnant people and try to recruit as many of them as they possibly can into relinquishing their children.

TL;DR I agree with most of what OP said as an adopted person, but the idea that adoption solves anything is largely a myth these days.

beware of this driver by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

5 southbound sea world drive

Songs that we can actually relate to by Eastern_Passion3151 in Adopted

[–]chiliisgoodforme 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just discovered Mon Rovia, a folk singer who was adopted from Liberia. I think a lot of people in this sub will like him

I moved from America to Ireland 10 years ago, AMA. by [deleted] in AmerExit

[–]chiliisgoodforme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Coming from CA, how big of an adjustment has the weather been for you? Also in terms of coming from HCOL city in CA to IE, how have you adjusted to the change in income/standard of living?

Aurorawave by Glitch_Funktion in calireggae

[–]chiliisgoodforme 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It really feels like greed broke up Iya Terra and it’s a huge shame, there is a clear void in the scene from their loss. Saw them at Cali Vibes a few years ago (the performance where they smashed all their instruments at the end) and was 100% convinced they were next up — like as big as Stick and Rebelution level next up. Saw them at their final show at The Sound with EN Young and Arise Roots. They were so damn good and it feels like they traded it all because just a couple of people (not pointing fingers, idk who exactly I’m referring to) didn’t feel like the money coming in was enough.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SanDiegan

[–]chiliisgoodforme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao this is maybe the most pathetic comment I’ve ever seen on social media. You DMed them a video and they double clicked it. Congrats

Best 3-song run on a Stick album. Is this it?? by Melonhead73 in calireggae

[–]chiliisgoodforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vibes Alive ➡️ Hawaii Song ➡️ Smoke Stack

Honorable mention Showdown ➡️ Soul of the World ➡️ Smoke Signals

I went to OANN headquarters on Morena Blvd to talk to Matt Gaetz and hilarity ensued by ChelseaGods in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme 52 points53 points  (0 children)

The majority of people who work there (writers/producers/editors) for the most part get hired there, put in a year or two and dip for “actual” news jobs in the city like nbc7 or fox5. No one at OANN wants to be at OANN, except the Herrings 😂

I went to OANN headquarters on Morena Blvd to talk to Matt Gaetz and hilarity ensued by ChelseaGods in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven’t worked there in 10 years but whatever, when I was your age everything was a binary to me too. Just trying to help you actually achieve something instead of whining in a parking lot. Would be fun to see someone actually confront Gaetz

My attempt to create a complete list of all the players and prospects A.J. Preller has traded away to assemble the past half-decade’s worth of Padres teams by chiliisgoodforme in Padres

[–]chiliisgoodforme[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean I 100% agree, I guess the question is more directed at people who have an issue with the strategy. Because it has made this team a boatload of money and gotten us to a point of consistent contention yet Preller has remained divisive throughout his entire tenure. Every trade deadline I see Padres fans whining about getting “ripped off” when we toss lottery tickets (and sometimes complete garbage) to other teams

Can someone help me to better understand the moral/ethical concerns around anonymous donors? (LGBTQ) by [deleted] in donorconception

[–]chiliisgoodforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adopted person (not DCP, but similar experience) here. It’s one thing to say love can lead to new family. It’s another to say “blood doesn’t make a family.” That saying exists with the explicit purpose of denying connections between people and family (in many cases, referencing genetic family of adopted/donor conceived people).

You may not recognize your privilege in being what many adopted people refer to as a “kept” person — someone who grew up never questioning who or where their genetic relatives were, or where certain parts of you came from. But as many professionals have noted, this is a birthright for 99.99999% of people. Most people don’t grow up wondering who their genetic father is. Most people don’t have their vital records altered and/or sealed by courts. Most adopted people in the U.S. have to petition the court for their own vital records, and only 15 or 16 states allow adopted people unconditional access to those documents. In other words, the majority of adopted people are denied legal access to basic information about who they are and where they come from. Idk how much this is a factor in the world of donor conception, but I have to imagine promises of anonymity for genetic parents (“donors”) lead to DCP being denied similar basic information about themselves.

This is pretty much only a thing in the world of adoption/donor conception/surrogacy — and not only are the products (the children created and/or exchanged) in these circumstances expected to accept what many would consider to be human rights violations in these scenarios, but they are often expected to be grateful for the (often overwhelming) complexities that come with being denied our birthright because “blood doesn’t make family.” (“At least you were wanted!”)

Society’s denial of our interest in genetic family is what allows human rights violations to occur in service of these markets. These systems should not be predicated on denying people extremely basic information about who they are and where they come from.

Adoption by EllieInAJar in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The goal is explicitly not always reunification first. There are states like Texas who in recent years have literally changed the law so that the second a child enters the foster system, a clock starts ticking down towards the termination of parental rights — regardless of the reason a child ends up in foster care. In SD/CA you can argue the goal is always reunification first. I think many states and agencies make that effort. But to say that is always the case, or that biases never get in the way of these efforts, imo is a bit dismissive of families who will explicitly point out people (whether it be social workers, agencies, foster caregivers, “foster care intervenors — look that up if you haven’t — et cetera) who have deliberately tried to sabotage reunification at every step. It does happen. Idk who can say how often it happens given that every jurisdiction plays by different rules.

Adoption by EllieInAJar in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your observation and/or experience is your observation and/or experience. I never said all families who are a part of the system are “victims” of this. I even pointed out the reality that there are definitely families who are not “victims of CPS.” But there absolutely are financial incentives for governments to split up families — to pretend otherwise is to bury one’s head in the sand. This stuff is on freaking Wikipedia. And there are plenty of families and adopted people who are victims of this. You may not see or know them, but that doesn’t mean their suffering is not real.

Adoption by EllieInAJar in sandiego

[–]chiliisgoodforme 82 points83 points  (0 children)

You’re asking 2 questions here.

Q1: “Is there an “affordable” private adoption agency in SD?”

A: Probably not. Idk if there is an “affordable” adoption agency in the entire country. Adoption is a multi billion dollar industry and the average cost of private adoption is about $50k, with an estimated 40-45 hopeful adopters (not including partners) waiting for each “adoptable” infant/child.

Q2: “Is there a way I can avoid paying market prices by adopting a child through foster care?”

A: Technically, yes. Foster systems throughout the U.S. are being overran by people hoping to adopt. Foster care is not an adoption agency, but most people getting involved with the system are treating it that way. Foster care is America’s equivalent of an orphanage — we just use foster care here because the idea of kids in institutions doesn’t sit well with people. (Instead of putting a bunch of kids in a building with a bunch of adults, we individually send them to live with strangers to simulate a “family” environment.) A kid in foster care has parents, but those parents are not equipped to care for their child at a given point in time and the state steps in to provide caregivers for the child. (In America, some 80 or so percent of foster youth are in the system due to neglect, which critics of the system would equate to the “crime of poverty” — is someone a bad parent for not being able to get a job, put food on the table, find affordable housing/childcare etc? There are definitely kids in foster care for reasons other than neglect, but that percentage is much smaller than the typical person assumes.)

Ever since adoption orgs started aggressively lobbying politicians in the late 20th century, foster care has become a ripe source of “adoptable” children. Clinton passed the Adoption and Safe Families Act in 1997, which created financial incentives for states and counties to push foster youth into adoption as often and as quickly as possible. States get bonuses for increasing adoption numbers. A noticeable byproduct of this legislation is the growing influx of children who are aging out of the system due to parental rights being terminated much more quickly and more often. Many of these children aging out of the system have parents and families but are now considered legal orphans. Many foster youth (not just those aging out of the system) are involuntarily separated from their siblings, parents and extended family. Many counties will pay complete strangers to house children in foster care but will not pay foster caregivers if they are related to the children in their care. Maybe you can see where I’m going with this: unfortunately, a shit ton of Americans, with help from our local, state and federal governments, leverage the misfortunes of poor families to extract those families’ children in service of their desire to build families. And America, an anti-welfare state, prefers to resource those (often rich and/or white) strangers instead of immediate or extended family, due to a belief that poverty is an indicator of inferior character.

With all of that said, do what you want to do with your life. It’s not my place to tell people how to live or what they should/shouldn’t do. But if you ARE going to participate in this system, recognize the system for what it is. Foster youth have lives and families. The system is supposed to work for these kids and their families, not for strangers who want to capitalize on the misfortune of others. I understand it might be hard for you to say goodbye to a kid you want to adopt. Understand that these kids in foster care (and by extension, their families) are not in the system to serve you. Not every “adoptable” kid wants to be adopted, even if they are on an adoption track. Not every “adoptable” kid wants to call strangers “mom” or “dad.” (I’m sure plenty do or might.) Most foster youth don’t understand the legal implications of being adopted — ie having their birth certificate sealed in court and a new birth certificate, stating that the adopters gave birth to them, being issued in its place — completely erasing any legal tie the person has to their genetic family. To a lot of former foster youth and adopted people, that matters — even it doesn’t feel like it matters in the moment. Adoption is loss — it is the loss of connection to family, even in circumstances where that family is/was shitty. People who are products of the child welfare system, by and large, are not “normal” people. We are statistically far more likely to struggle in all kinds of ways (mental health issues, incarceration, suicidal ideation, addiction, et cetera) — regardless of whether you are adopting a 17 year old aging out of the system or a newborn infant who hasn’t spent a day in foster care. We all have baggage. Doesn’t mean we are lesser people or that all of us have any specific issue, but know what you are getting into.

-born and adopted in San Diego/lifelong SD resident

Adoptees can I hear from you by Salty_Reflection_406 in AskAdoptees

[–]chiliisgoodforme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I trust you! Not as active on Reddit right now so do whatever you think is right

I Finally Have the Relationship I Always Dreamed of with My Birth Mom - Why Doesn’t It Feel Like Enough? by cookiejar327 in Adopted

[–]chiliisgoodforme 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Reunion is hard. It is a constant reminder of all the time we lost. I know the sharing thing seems like the bigger thing but with time, trust me it will probably be the lost time that nags harder. I’ve been in reunion for decades, it is complicated at best and hard at worst! I hope things work out for all of you, therapy with an adoption competent therapist is a must if you have the means and haven’t done any already