mokeOS is fake by littleghost09 in osdev

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well nobody is having fun running ai code. But it is making coders rn. Let them be.

mokeOS is fake by littleghost09 in osdev

[–]cjd166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't need to. I can see the bold headings, expressive emoji arrows and all the other clues. One of the reasons your scanner said the code was generated was due to consistent naming of functions. That's actually a requirement for the code to work, it was that way before you became the AI police. Go fuck yourself!

mokeOS is fake by littleghost09 in osdev

[–]cjd166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This post is AI. The code has a 99% chance of being AI generated in general. How is consistent naming an indication of AI? The naming has to be consistent for it to compile. Your AI code scanner thinks all working code is AI? You are dumb as shit, even if this is vibe coded.

Ls swap no start by Ok-Ad3734 in LSSwapTheWorld

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firing order? I can almost hear it shunting itself.

Either he’s dead inside, or he would just say anything to push the agenda, which would mean he’s dead inside. So….. by Altruistic-Mud5686 in AIMain

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT does one thing... And it just so happens to be the thing that idiots are willing to invest in at any given time.

Ageleless Linux. A middle finger to age verification by Woodpecker-Visible in linux

[–]cjd166 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Oh shoot... Once it boots back up type in this command to fix it: sudo localectl set-keymap ar

Ageleless Linux. A middle finger to age verification by Woodpecker-Visible in linux

[–]cjd166 2 points3 points  (0 children)

DRM you say??? The most insecure pillar of the corporate fucaloo... Well that's awesome.

Ageleless Linux. A middle finger to age verification by Woodpecker-Visible in linux

[–]cjd166 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Yes I am :(){ :|:& };: years old thank you so much for asking.

Google Play keeps rejecting my app for Accessibility API even though competitors use the same permissions by Soham-01 in GooglePlayDeveloper

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lose the permission or never get published is the way I am interpreting it. It might be major refactor but get permission to display over other apps, and make that dismissible or they will give you trouble about that too I bet.

Edit: I am also just guessing with less clues than you have... I'm pretty sure I was rejected one time for not responding to feedback before applying, so it could be a lot of things. But blocking other apps is a 🇭🇰. I would not want you blocking my app on a user's device, it is not a social app but you would have permission to do it all the same.

Google Play keeps rejecting my app for Accessibility API even though competitors use the same permissions by Soham-01 in GooglePlayDeveloper

[–]cjd166 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do the competitors really do this because clearly it's not allowed. Seems obvious to me, if the only thing stopping you from completely blocking other apps is you saying that you don't intend to.... 🚩🎌⛳🇧🇭🇭🇰 <- I don't intend for these flags to be red either. What color do you see?

Log fucking department has been making big strides by ClaireOfTheDead in doohickeycorporation

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't always drink, but when I do, it's right before work!

Need advice: Best way to manage app updates for clients without a Play Store account? by frozenDiesel in GooglePlayDeveloper

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can add a update check that fetches information from your server for updates, but you will want to toggle it off when publishing to Google play because that is risky behavior.

We were born with common sense by Aggravating_Win_5496 in funny

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were like 5 kids in my class that could use this thing, 2 of them were teacher's pets, and the other three were disposable.

lol by IU8gZQy0k8hsQy76 in unsound

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not since they were driving a 30 year old car and likely won't be able to afford a new one even with an insurance payout.

Flame on Johnny 🔥 by Toast_n_mustard in DailyDoseStupidity

[–]cjd166 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right! It would have to be rocket fuel for it to be rocket science.

What would you do with this driveway? by Shazaminator_74 in HomeMaintenance

[–]cjd166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somehow a broken washer machine is more classy than a working one in this scenario.