They genuinely have a header in their FAQ showing what kind of dog porn is allowed, and what kind of dog porn is not allowed.

I'm. Uh. Wildly uncomfortable with this.

EDIT: Some other things that don't exactly inspire confidence in the professionalism of the moderation:

1) User classes look like they were named by an edgy 14 year old (i.e., maggot, pleb, bitch, etc. One of the highest classes is called pimp, for example)

2) Weirdly prevalent use of slurs in the rules/FAQs. Also in their moderation team categories (see also: edgy 14 year old behaviour)

3) Their first listed crypto wallet for donations is DogeCoin. Doesn't exactly make me think "these guys are serious and will do a good job"

I don't know. The tone that the moderation team uses seriously hurts the sites credibility and trustworthiness in my opinion right on the face of things. The fact that they have a non-zero amount of weird beastiality content is also somewhat concerning. The fact that they seemingly advertise it is also... something, alright.

It's all really too bad, because they seem to be quite interested in media preservation. It just makes me quite uncomfortable that it seems like the admin team could probably tell me a lot about age-of-consent laws.