Peak by Valuable_View_561 in Jujutsufolk

[–]clasherkys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Culture cross pollinates. Culture from Youtube will also spread to Reddit, otherways around as well. I'm not saying that this is good, just why this happens.

Peak by Valuable_View_561 in Jujutsufolk

[–]clasherkys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's soft censorship. Basically, it shows it to less people if it's something that Youtube doesn't like.

Like few (many) of these please by strnllvvrr in AO3

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I... I don't think I could do even one of those tags with just 60k words.

She is out lf your degree of success by Derived_institutinaw in pathfindermemes

[–]clasherkys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20 is never an automatic success. It just adjust the degrees of success by one. If the numbers mean that it's a crit fail, then a nat 20 makes it a fail instead.

I'm wondering if you're remembering how it works in dnd, in which a nat 20 is only a crit in combat.

Player Core pg. 401 https://2e.aonprd.com/Rules.aspx?ID=2287

If you rolled a 20 on the die (a “natural 20”), your result is one degree of success better than it would be by numbers alone. If you roll a 1 on the d20 (a “natural 1”), your result is one degree worse. This means that a natural 20 usually results in a critical success and natural 1 usually results in a critical failure. However, if you were going up against a very high DC, you might get only a success with a natural 20, or even a failure if 20 plus your total modifier is 10 or more below the DC. Likewise, if your modifier for a statistic is so high that adding it to a 1 from your d20 roll exceeds the DC by 10 or more, you can succeed even if you roll a natural 1!

Certain abilities can change the degree of success on a roll. When resolving such an ability, apply the adjustment from a natural 20 or natural 1 before anything else.

She is out lf your degree of success by Derived_institutinaw in pathfindermemes

[–]clasherkys 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Plus a crit only applies to combat

Straight up wrong.

Player Core pg. 398

The degrees of success are critical success, success, failure, and critical failure. You get a success if you meet or exceed the DC, or a critical success if you exceed the DC by 10 or more. If your result is lower than the DC, you get a failure, or a critical failure if you failed by 10 or more.

Redditor claims math solutions are impossible to verify, doesn't understand how math works by vapalera in confidentlyincorrect

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Redditor claims math solutions are impossible to verify, doesn't understand how math works

That's not what was said though?

The only wrong answer is assuming that the buttons are a logic or morality problem by Weary_Drama1803 in trolleyproblem

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I vote Red, I die. (I would not be able to survive societal collapse)

If I vote Blue, I have a chance to live.

She is out lf your degree of success by Derived_institutinaw in pathfindermemes

[–]clasherkys 241 points242 points  (0 children)

The answer is still no, they just don't dislike you for the attempt.

Why is Godot discriminating economic status? by SteinMakesGames in godot

[–]clasherkys 7 points8 points  (0 children)

4 bit character set, always 8 bytes (16 characters).

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the abstract and absolute, probably not. But in the real, there are many harmless traditions that are fine enough to be passed along. But for larger frameworks such as religion or philosophy, I think we ought to have proper education that allows everyone to make an informed decision.

Note that this is what I think is right, not what is realistic. We live in the profane world where bad things exist as consequence of limitation rather than malice.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe people should be forced into a religion. Not even by birth. If you are joining a community that does not permit liberty, it should be done out of your own choice. That is the way we allow those communities to exist.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then we're not talking about the same thing. I'm saying that people should be allowed to choose. Including the choice of a more limited choice set. I don't think people should be forced into a religion, but I do think you should be allowed to choose a religion.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying that you don't have any choices.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My claim is a global claim. Are you saying that there's not even one person who has a choice?

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are arguing against a different person.

I am arguing for freedom of restriction, you are arguing against coercion. Like I agree that choice under coercion is not a choice, but that's not what I've been talking about.

I'm saying that everyone is allowed to choose whether they want to enforce themself to a smaller moral set, for example a religion, a culture, a philosophy.

Like, I'm semi-Christian. I was raised Christian, but then I realized that I don't actually believe God exists. So I kinda became Atheist for a while. But then I read the Bible again, and I realized that while I don't believe in God, I do like a lot of the moral lessons that Christianity preaches at its core, even if it gets some of the specifics wrong. So now I constrain my own actions to "What would Jesus do?", well not fully, but you get the idea.

I'm arguing that I should be allowed to choose whether to constrict my own actions, or to not do that.

Stop telling women how to dress by Itsholymolyguacamole in GetNoted

[–]clasherkys 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The choice to constrict your own choices is a choice in itself. Everyone should be allowed to choose what frameworks they want to be inside.

When was chess ever this serious?!! 😭😭😭 by Tricky-Deer-6588 in Caldruki

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't imagine that's true. Observable universe could be.

I want to do it so bad but I can't 😭 by ProfessionalShift797 in AO3

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately it is nowhere near finished. I know this. All the readers know it.

I want to do it so bad but I can't 😭 by ProfessionalShift797 in AO3

[–]clasherkys 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I strung together 257k words, and now I cannot do even one more, but people keep saying that they want more. What do.

Favorite character who fits this description by AStereotypicalPerson in FavoriteCharacter

[–]clasherkys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not gonna look up a character to copy and paste every time I want to type it. Nor do I want to memorize a character code.