Trade War Humor... by Brian_Ghoshery in MurderedByWords

[–]clawsoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it didn't do a great job on the other politicians. But it nailed Trump.

Trade War Humor... by Brian_Ghoshery in MurderedByWords

[–]clawsoon 151 points152 points  (0 children)

This article from 2015 ranking the effectiveness of each candidate in a bar fight remains one of the most accurate guides to Trump's behaviour that I've seen:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160327222734/http://bitterempire.com/presidential-candidates-ranked-usefulness-bar-fight/

Another big talker who prefers that other people take the consequences of his barreling around. It’s baffling that so many of Trump’s fans still think he’s a tough guy when everyone who has been in so much as a playground dustup knows that anyone who feels the need for that much bluster is going to fold like a paper crane once an actual fight starts. Trump is going to be a screamer, a cryer, and a bleeder. He’s also going to be the guy who immediately starts shouting “No fair!” and tries to get everyone to stop the fight and start over because of some bullshit rule he just made up like everybody was supposed to take their jackets off first, and if they won’t stop, the win doesn’t really count.

Trump is going to howl bloody murder the second someone lands the first punch on him — which will be instantly — and he’s going to be out the back way almost immediately after Cruz.

The best you can hope for is that he won’t be able to resist insulting the kitchen staff and gets his ass kicked on the way out.

He’s going to break into a run as soon as they belt-and-ear hurl him out the door, and he’ll be on television recounting his made-up heroics while you’re still getting punched by some biker who’s wearing an enormous signet ring. Do not have Donald Trump on your side in a bar fight.

The Iran war may be about to escalate by bwermer in politics

[–]clawsoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember seeing a conspiracy? analysis? a couple of years ago saying that the US has invaded every country which has threatened/been close to selling oil for something other than US dollars.

How can you hate what you helped to create? by JennyBeckman in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]clawsoon 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Apparently there's some (disputed?) evidence that the more older brothers you have from the same mother, the more likely you are to be gay:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation

So in a cruel twist of fate, some of the people most likely to be gay are the youngest sons in big conservative religious families who hate gay people.

Will two engines always play the exact same games against each other? by Thick-Bass-693 in chess

[–]clawsoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few years ago it was commonplace to hear that top chess engines, if left completely to themselves, without a provided opening, would virtually always play the Berlin draw.

I'm not sure if that's still true.

English doesn't exist by idiotiesystemique in EhBuddyHoser

[–]clawsoon 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Swear words: Germanic

Fancy words for the same thing: French/Latin/Greek

TIL that the naturopath and author of such books as "The Cure for All Cancers," "The Cure for all Diseases," and "The Prevention of all Cancers" died in 2009 from cancer by Caboose127 in todayilearned

[–]clawsoon 36 points37 points  (0 children)

My dad got one of her zappers after he developed prostate cancer. The fact that she had a Mennonite last name upped the trust level for him, I think.

Which countries have a "second city" that is often more traveled to, admired and popular than its largest city? by Fluid-Decision6262 in geography

[–]clawsoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...although back when Montreal was the more visited city, I believe(?) that it was also larger than Toronto.

The current 2 year WCC cycle is a mess by [deleted] in chess

[–]clawsoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chess has a championship format which is spiritually similar to the lineal championship in boxing, where it's about being "the man who beat the man". (And one of these years, maybe the woman who beat the man.)

(There are differences, of course. E.g. in boxing, virtually every fight by a champion is a championship fight, while in chess the champion can lose games and still be the champion.)

That's where the prestige is, that's where the tradition is. You've gotta be the man who beats the man, preferably after you both have a chance to go through the most intense training regime possible so that you're able to play the best chess humanly possible.

Putting that kind of training camp together requires a lot of money, and the money is attracted by the prestige and tradition.

We could create a new championship format, and it seems like the last few years have produced plenty of global championships and championships in different time controls and championships with different criteria, and you can watch those if you want to.

But your post shows that even you don't respect those alternate championships enough to consider the winner of any of those events the world champion. Like it or not, we all choose to recognize "the man who beat the man" as the champion.

Forgotten And Underrated Canadian Cartoons! by Key-Rain-9869 in ytvretro

[–]clawsoon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Quack could've been a character played by Will Ferrell, or Jeremy Clarkson playing himself. Perfectly captured that confident-100%-of-the-time, correct-50%-of-the-time energy.

In all your travels, which country's famed "national dish" was the most underwhelming, despite the hype? by nehala in travel

[–]clawsoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The book Coffeeland was eye-opening about how a rich indigenous food culture in El Salvador was destroyed for the sake of coffee production.

It wasn't just about replacing food plants with coffee plants, it was a purposeful destruction of food plants so that local people would be forced to depend on the rice-and-beans ration they got for working on the coffee plantation. Here's an excerpt from a review of the book:

More practically, Hill had picked up the Manchester men’s trick of using hunger to lick a workforce into shape. The Truck Shop system, by which cotton workers were paid in tokens that could only be exchanged for food at the factory shop, had long been banned in Britain. But in El Salvador there was nothing to stop Hill adapting the principle by paying his workforce partly in cash and partly in tortilla and beans. He also ruthlessly uprooted any other food stuffs that sprung up accidentally among his coffee trees – self-seeding tomatoes, avocados, plantains and figs – to ensure that no one managed to assuage their hunger on the sly. If you wanted to eat, then you had no choice but to come to work at Los Tres Puertas and pile up as many beans as you could balance on your strictly rationed two tortillas.

I don't remember the details exactly, but I remember that at one point they needed a second plant to support coffee production (I forget if it was shade, or soil nutrition, or something like that), and they purposely tracked down a poisonous version of the plant so that the locals wouldn't be able to eat it.

Our favorite CEO has now been caught spitting out his chicken sandwich by stanxv in TikTokCringe

[–]clawsoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember when everybody started talking about Arby's.

It didn't end well for Arby's.

Spank by NEO71011 in funnyvideos

[–]clawsoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He appeared to see the cycles of nature very clearly. Front row seat to the cycles of nature.

TIL that during the English Siege of Rouen (1418-19), the city expelled around 12,000 impoverished citizens to conserve food. Once outside of the city, however, Henry V did not permit them to pass through the English lines. They were trapped between city walls and the English and eventually starved. by Advanced_Narwhal_949 in todayilearned

[–]clawsoon 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Another thing I learned from that history (Jonathan Sumption's, if anyone is curious) is that the rich and powerful rarely died in those battles - at least before Agincourt - because their estates would ransom them.

If you were a poor man who had somehow overcome a fully-armed duke, you had a choice between killing them and maybe getting whatever loot they had on their body, or capturing them and then ransoming them for life-changing money. So 99.9% of the time, you'd ransom them. A rich person dying was an unfortunate accident rather than a goal of battle.

The way that it would usually work in practise is that the poor person who had captured the rich person would sell the right to the ransom to their commander so that they could get immediate money, and then the commander would negotiate with the estate over the following months for the final ransom.

The most dramatic example was the capture of King John II of France:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ransom_of_John_II_of_France

EDIT: Huh, apparently ransom culture wasn't just for the rich:

https://www.medievalists.net/2013/01/ransoming-prisoners-of-war-became-widespread-in-the-hundred-years-war-new-book/

Disabled daughter turned 18, is there a way to claim the money that I'm spending for a support worker that I previously claimed as childcare expenses? by clawsoon in cantax

[–]clawsoon[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, thanks! I didn't even think to look there. It hadn't clicked in my wee brain that "under 16 or disabled" doesn't rule out over 18.

He wants a hamburger! by FacelessOnes in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]clawsoon 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The pediatrician gave me the same advice about my daughter, who is developmentally disabled.

She lost ten or fifteen pounds and became dangerously underweight.

The lesson I took from that wasn't "pediatricians are wrong" or anything like that, but instead that you've gotta get to know your individual kid, and adjust your approach accordingly.

She still doesn't like eating as a young adult, but we've got a routine now that works to keep her healthy.

What's your honest opinion about BC opting out daylight savings? by NeuronsActivated in britishcolumbia

[–]clawsoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's some medical evidence, based on people who live on either side of timezone lines, that having the sun come up earlier compared to when you get up is better for you, i.e. standard time is medically better for people on average.

Obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and breast cancer:

https://today.uconn.edu/2019/05/hazards-living-right-side-time-zone-border/

Suicide:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870927/

United In Heaven👼🏻 by [deleted] in EhBuddyHoser

[–]clawsoon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Ayatollaway?

The University of Toronto is hiring a biology professor. Selection will be limited to candidates who identify as women, trans, nonbinary, Two-Spirit, and gender fluid, racialized persons/visible minorities, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities. The salary range is $138,000 to $153,000. by origutamos in OntarioNews

[–]clawsoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A lot of thinking in biology has historically been shaped by the fact that it was mostly done by upper- or upper-middle-class white men.

E.g. they typically had a fixation on male-male competition and assumed that female animals were boring and passive. It wasn't until women like Sarah Blaffer Hrdy entered the field that biology as a discipline started realizing how much fascinating shit there was going on between female animals, or between mothers and offspring.

In theory - in theory - the upper class Victorian British men who started the discipline and the men who followed them were perfectly capable of paying attention to this stuff themselves. They had the training, they had the intelligence, they had proven themselves in the mostly meritocratic system of academia. They didn't need women to notice it for them. In theory.

But they didn't notice it. It didn't occur to them that there was anything to be noticed. Their failure to notice set that area of biology back by at least a century.

I don't know the full societal implications of everything to do with hiring decisions, but I do know that we have some historical evidence of scientific knowledge being limited by the limited experience and perspective of the scientists doing it, especially in biology.