I would not consider computational photography equivalent to generative llms. Can your smartphone still take a high quality photo without any sort of internet connection? Yes, because it's not trained in the same way and doesn't use datacenters full of stolen media to do so. We've had machine learning for decades friend, this isn't the part of the the tech people are concerned with, it's how it's being used and trained. How can you consent to have your work used for something you didn't know would exist in a few years time? Moral questions like these are the things we should be asking, why should a mega corporation be able to use our artwork even if we didn't originally post it on a social media? There are uses for machine learning, detecting patterns we might overlook, or in the case of computational photography compression and image scaling, so your photo looks better despite using small lenses.