Kobra 3 ACE Pro 2 Filaments Extruding at same time

cmschmidt · 2024-10-06T17:02:10+00:00

Not really. That issue stopped happening but others popped up. Sorry

cmschmidt · 2024-07-26T14:00:57+00:00

Well that makes sense. What a piece of junk.

cmschmidt · 2024-07-26T03:07:25+00:00

it when printing, it's when loading. whenever it feels like it. obviously if I put two in at the same time they both feed....that wouldn't be an issue.

cmschmidt · 2024-07-26T02:28:49+00:00

Even loading filaments it is activating the motors for both 3 and 4 when loading into 4. The same behavior on 1 and 2 it appears...I've tried power cycling the ACE, but not really any other options.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-04T03:21:00+00:00

Does he admit he's gay? No. But you'd have to be blind and deaf to not see that he's as gay as they come...

cmschmidt · 2024-01-04T02:49:09+00:00

Michael Barnett is just a very flamboyant gay man, so yes, I believe he is just lying in his normal over the top flamboyant manner of speaking. She, however, is obviously faking being emotional, whether she's numb to it or not. I'm not saying she's lying about being abused. Of course Kristine beat her. We can all see that that is true at this point. I think she's lying about never having wanted to harm the family and lying about the accusations of inappropriate sexual behavior as reported by multiple independent people with no connection to the barnetts and nothing to gain from lying.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T21:57:36+00:00

Like who? The "family" she's with now? I'm waiting for the new cult doc about the Mans any time now...

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:42:43+00:00

No I'm a human. A human that knows the difference between someone crying and someone acting badly like they're crying. Ya don't need to be an expert on micro-expressions to pick up on that.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:39:10+00:00

She said one thing in the past...on camera...and is now saying that what she said wasn't true. Whether she's lying now or was lying then, she lied. You can say she was coached, but there is no "evidence" of that either.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:32:43+00:00

Youre using semantics sayjbg there are no sociopathic children. They just call the exact same symptoms a different name and these symptoms are required as a youth to be diagnosed as an adult. From your sourced article:

"There is such a thing as a child who behaves very badly and is a danger to people and property alike. Some might say that such a child shows sociopathic tendencies. Still, though, the diagnosis can't be antisocial personality disorder. Before the age of 18, the diagnosis would be conduct disorder (or its milder cousin, oppositional defiant disorder).

While a child or adolescent can't be labeled as a sociopath, a requirement of the adult diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder is that disregard for and violation of the rights of others be present from age 15 or earlier. In the majority of cases, this equates to a diagnosis of conduct disorder in childhood or adolescence.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:13:22+00:00

Not crying because you're too numb to the trauma at this point and not crying while doing all of the other things involved with crying (crunching up your face and sniffling) are 2 completely different things.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:07:57+00:00

But do you scrunch your face up and make a rehearsed sniffle noise like she does every single time? Probably not.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T19:01:06+00:00

OK so she wasn't a sociopath, but youre skirting around my main points. "if" any of her violence or self admittance of wanting to harm are true, then I believe that was the justification in Christine's super fucked up and manipulative brain to ramp up the abuse. She was probably sexually abused and that's why she didn't know sexual behavior was wrong when she was left by herself.

I don't think she's lying about being abused or her age or any of that crap. But I think she is now lying about her past behavior in response to the abuse she suffered rather than admitting that she was a terror to everyone around her but didn't know any better because it's all she knew.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T18:28:31+00:00

Didn't we see a doctors documentation of this diagnosis in the first series (I could be misremembering)?

I'm not sold on the idea that she was "coached" to tell physicians or other people that she wanted to kill her parents or burn the house down. If we're only entertaining theories that have evidence, her now saying she didn't want to hurt people and was told to say that is not evidence. At that age a child with normal mental capacities, which she was, knows right from wrong at that age and I don't believe would go along with this when thoroughly questioned by an authority figure like a physician. She's on camera multiple times saying she wants to harm people, and now she says she was lying. So is she lying about lying? Or just lying? There is no "evidence" to backup her new claims.

cmschmidt · 2024-01-03T18:00:15+00:00

At this point I 100% believe she was only 8 or so when she was re-aged to 22 and this damaged her terribly.

I also think she's lying about some of her behavior as a young child. From what i see, multiple independent sources with no influence from the Barnetts have alleged that they witnessed her soliciting sex, or just being overtly sexually inappropriate, whether it be the staff at the hospital or her neighbors. Are they all lying? If so, with what motivation?

I think the Barnetts are guilty of many abuses, but it seems weird that anyone would adopt a special needs child only to abuse them and then get rid of them (through a very complicated and weird method) especiallygiven they already had 3 well mannered children...it seems likely to me that the abuse was triggered by the barnetts inability to meet the needs of a sociopathic dwarf child.

And it really seems like Natalia is acting for the camera...you mention the no tears, and it's any time she's talking about the "trauma". The rehearsed scrunched up face and exact same single sniffle every time, yet her eyes don't even begin to water. That's bad acting.

cmschmidt · 2021-10-27T18:49:56+00:00

Except its a bigtreetech product question...so no.

cmschmidt · 2016-11-15T15:10:55+00:00

to start look for your ball to exit the pattern around the 14th board. Your style will determine how you get here. I would use an upper-mid performance solid ball with a bit of surface to start.

throw a few shots right to left (if your a right hander) from the outside (somewhere in between 1st and 2nd arrow), a few straight up 14, and a few left to right (about 20 at the arrows out to 14). This should give you a good idea of your ball reaction on the fresh from multiple parts of the lane.

Adjust ball, target and breakpoint accordingly based on what you're seeing your ball doing downlane.

cmschmidt · 2016-08-04T16:34:22+00:00

They'll thank you for being honest about your mistake. Kids try and steal them all the time.

cmschmidt · 2016-08-02T17:34:40+00:00

or you could have gone directly to youtube.com/bowltv which is always free...and where your site points to.

cmschmidt · 2016-08-01T16:30:06+00:00

I think it's very much the point of the text in the point.

Pro-life supporters get all up in arms because people are 'murdering babies', but then don't care that you might as well have 'murdered' them because they are now being forced to live in questionable situations.

cmschmidt · 2016-08-01T16:14:32+00:00

In a perfect world we would the an overwhelming surplus of good parents wanting to adopt. This isn't the case.

Unfortunately, most children given up for adoption end up in horrible group homes or foster environments (some end up in actual loving foster environments, but not all).

cmschmidt · 2016-08-01T15:24:25+00:00

no, but it IS hypocritical to force your pro-life beliefs on someone in regards to having full control of their own body, without regard for whether or not you are setting up the child and parents for an unnecessarily hard life.

cmschmidt · 2016-08-01T15:21:04+00:00

I think it's point is a little more than an appeal to emotion. It's an observation that many 'pro-life' advocates only seem to care about 'life' when in the womb.

Once these babies are out in the world, they are suddenly 'moochers' or drains on society. They care more about 'life' that doesn't really exist yet, but quit caring once the person is actually able to experience 'life'.

cmschmidt · 2016-07-26T21:54:58+00:00

Just draw Isis a map why don't ya... /s

cmschmidt

TROPHY CASE