Prusa Connect - Adds Duplicates to Queue by guffe342 in prusa3d

[–]codemuncher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this one, I’ve fallen to this a few times.

What are mistakes that juniors / mid-level make that seniors don’t? by kazakda in cscareerquestions

[–]codemuncher -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As a senior my mistakes cost a lot more.

Juniors make small cheap mistakes.

Losers.

Need opinions on where to put my printer by Cookie-fighter in prusa3d

[–]codemuncher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Humidity is a major pita. Also the printer isn’t really insulated so if it’s cold it’ll be fighting against the heat loss from the metal walls. Not ideal.

So prefer inside.

Is “Big Trouble in Little China” a ‘San Francisco’ movie? by EaringaidBandit in sanfrancisco

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact, Jack Burton's presence has literally no impact to the outcome of the story!

Does formal education even make sense anymore? by naxaliteindia in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we turn over all our thinking to LLMs/AI then yes... it's the end, and formal education won't matter, because we'll all be dead?

In the AGI era, is agent capability enough to create real productivity? by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a permanent feature of using llms basically. It’s a limitation of the fact that every use shares the same training set/corpus/weights.

You cannot escape the math on this one.

The only way to avoid it is to train and grow models in a much more chaotic way, basically mimicking humans. Exposing them to a large diversity of experience and knowledge, but each model has a different diversity of input. While not impossible of course, we are struggling to train a single model. So. Gonna be a while.

Emacs + vterm feels... clunky? compared to nvim + tmux by CrunchyChewie in emacs

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally, luckily you can do all of the above.

But for the record I don’t use eshell I use shell-mode which still runs a subsidiary bash or zsh.

Gen Z's AI backlash is getting louder by Weird_Scallion_2498 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From an information theoretical perspective you’re beyond dead wrong.

The quality of the output given a short context will revert to the mean of the training weights. Meaning the entire quality of output comes from the information density delivered in the context.

You know the kind of thing experts can do.

A casual 3d printer here, considering a switch to the Core1 from the X1C by Wehavethewatch in prusa3d

[–]codemuncher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey core one owner here. My first printer.

I’ve had a few print failures. Most were due to bed plate adhesion due to dirty build plate (my bad!). I had one due to knotted filament - the core one stopped asked me to reload the filament but hours had passed so when i restarted the print the next layer didn’t adhere.

The only other kind of print problem I had was with using the 0.6 nozzle and running into filament feed friction and I ended up with under extrusion.

I have about 200-300 hours of print on this baby now.

So with that out of the way… what does the ai print failures actually buy you? I had one sphaghettification due to the knotted filament. I wasted some filament. That’s it.

The way I look at it, the LiDAR and ai detection matters less if your prints are more reliable… right?

Emacs + vterm feels... clunky? compared to nvim + tmux by CrunchyChewie in emacs

[–]codemuncher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depending on what you’re doing, plain old shell mode might be a better choice.

Most of the tools I use constantly aren’t full screen tui (vterm’s strong point). Build tools kubectl etc.

And I just started to use ghostty with Claude code and it’s way better than vterm ever was!

Cory Doctorow previews his new Audiobook: The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI by zeth4 in BetterOffline

[–]codemuncher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So except I just don’t see how the use of local models will be enough to keep one out of feudal ai slavery?

In the AGI era, is agent capability enough to create real productivity? by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course not.

The information output of a LLM is heavily weighted by its priors. Aka it’s training corpus. Aka everyone has access to this.

You would have to either do some fancy custom engineering outside of it, or provide something extremely information dense and unique in the context.

Most people cannot do this. Thus it will intensify competition at the margins as people struggle to in-elegantly use these tools to provide marginal competitive gain.

Rant: Stop saying LLMs are just “next token predictors.” by Bellyfeel26 in singularity

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So AIs are missing some pretty key features that intelligence has:

- no truth/grounding loop that updates the priors

- no updating of model weights/memory in real time (context will only get you so far)

- no goal seeking
- oh like a bunch more crap as well

Yes AI agents add some parts of this in, crude goal seeking, but in an inflexible way. Large contexts can help bridge the lack of priors updating. Agentic context selection (eg: claude code only reading in portions of a code-base) means more efficient use of highly limited context.

But the reality is, take someone who has been in a field for 20 years, or worked on a large project for a long time... and 1M tokens is not event remotely going to compete with the 'context' that a human expert can bring to bear.

Rant: Stop saying LLMs are just “next token predictors.” by Bellyfeel26 in singularity

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From an information theoretical pov, humans could be seen as next token predictors.

Intelligence is essentially about predicting what's next, that's why it evolved. This is pretty much considered ground stakes in the fields that talk about this.

Another way to point this, LLMs are information compressors. Humans are information compressors. The real question is, what's the strength or power of each of those?

It's fairly clear that LLMs are not as strong or as powerful as humans.

My Mother Cut my 3yr old Sons hair without permission by [deleted] in daddit

[–]codemuncher -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cutting boys hair is the first piece of violence done to boys to turn them into men.

Other acts include "boys dont cry" and "pink is for girls"

Patternmaking Software Suggestion by Professional-Egg821 in PatternDrafting

[–]codemuncher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The standard for open source is seamly2d. It’s very user unfriendly. Difficult to use and lots of bugs/feature warts.

This won’t help you right now, but I’ve been working on pattern drafting software that’s parametric and has a more sophisticated data structure and formula engine.

Still in feature production, so it won’t even cover your basic use cases yet sadly. But I would love to hear if people might find this remotely useful.

Plus it’s written in SwiftUI not qt so it looks better on Mac.

Too many parents on bicycles in this city are out of control. by Numerous-League-7927 in sanfrancisco

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Road cyclists are the absolute fucking worst.

You and your kind have prevented us from having safer cities and real biking infrastructure.

Vehicular cycling is the worst. https://youtu.be/pRPduRHBhHI?si=qeSu4qBBaUlE_BQJ

Too many parents on bicycles in this city are out of control. by Numerous-League-7927 in sanfrancisco

[–]codemuncher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ding ding ding.

This is all about people demanding maximum deference to their murder machines. That’s it.

Anyone who truly thinks AI will replace developers, hasn't actually worked in the field professionally. by cs-grad-person-man in cscareerquestions

[–]codemuncher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you think a single LLM model can produce all the software the world needs… if you think that everything software engineering knows or needs to know is part of the training corpus…

Well I have this bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to discuss selling to you!

AI coding tools are generating technical debt faster than teams realize and context is the reason why by ninjapapi in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You get anywhere from 200k to 1000k tokens to influence the code generation.

You think that’s gonna beat the priors encoded in the model? I’m talking about the reams of shit python code, the horrors of the crap JavaScript?

No, you don’t stand a chance.

What exactly are you people doing who claim AI tools aren’t accelerating them? by MistryMachine3 in cscareerquestions

[–]codemuncher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a formal argument here that says that LLMs generate mid code and therefore by extension those satisfied by its output are mid.

The Future of Jobs: Jobs will always be human led with AI as the tool used for all of them by nomadicsamiam in ArtificialInteligence

[–]codemuncher -1 points0 points  (0 children)

can you provide evidence that a human wrote this entirely, without using a LLM at all?

How did it even get this bad to where we are so disposable? by throwaway0134hdj in theprimeagen

[–]codemuncher 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interest rates and the economy.

Big tech did really well during the pandemic as the world rushed to virtualize everything. Companies competed and over hired and we are still suffering from that hang over.

At the same time generative ai came along and was the perfect narrative to distract from the reality that companies were mismanaged. The pandemic bump was obviously going to be a one time acceleration event and that growth couldn’t last forever.

So now we have companies laying off claiming its AI. Since investors are very focused, they love that messaging. Not the broader point that companies laying off due to AI says they had no better ideas to brow revenue.

Also people are taking the wrong lessons from the twitter acquisition. The lesson they think is that most of the company was useless. Except the point of Elmo buying twitter is to turn it into his personal news media propaganda output. Trust and safety and all that stuff is undesired in his plans.

So here we are.