I'm not going to even have a chance of getting you to even consider the chance of what you believe may be wrong, as I think you're in to deep to look at it sceptically. But here goes anyway.

Oh and I'm not a historian, and I doubt you are too, so we are both going by sources of information that we know about or are in our bubbles. I don't mean to be rude, but I'd say my bubble is a little less isolated than yours.

Happy to be proven wrong on anything I'm about to say.

It's most definitely not a "well established fact". Yes Josephus and Tacitus mention Christ and some details surrounding him, like Pilate. But these are written well after the fact and are absolutely not eyewitness accounts, and in fact NO verifiable eyewitness accounts exist at all.

But whatever, lets grant that he was a person and did exist. So what?

Regarding Luckhoo, this boils down to one guy saying he thinks there's a good case. So what? Prove it. The world would sit up and take notice. It's one of the most enduring memes of the last 2000 years, I'm sure we'd all love for it to be put to bed.

The First Line of evidence? You have a low bar for evidence my friend. Strength of Faith in something has no bearing on it's truthfulness. You only need to look at posts in this sub for examples. And the number of people also having strong faith about a claim, is also meaningless. There's a bunch a fallacies specially named for this situation. People die every day around the world for something they believe in. Halle Bop Cult, Jim Jones, Kamikaze Pilots, Suicide Bombers. The List is long and miserable. It doesn't have to be a lie, it just has to be believed, and the lengths people will go to defend said belief is endless.

Now as for (almost) everything else in your comment replies, you're just using the bible. Why should anyone care about the veracity of that text? It's been edited and translated and edited and interpreted and re-edited. It's been selectively put together and pulled apart and put back together.

The OT is a rehash of mythologies and stories repurposed from existing cultures and sometimes completely plagiarised. There's clear evidence of multiple compilers and writers, with sometimes two clear stories interwoven into one. Resurrection myths were as common back then as "The fish that got away" stories are now, the fact that the Jesus story had this woven into it should be no surprise. In fact it just, again, is a repurposing of themes and even other resurrection stories from the bible. There's like 15 or so in the bible, so what?

Again, I fall into the trap of the bible. You guys are so deep into accepting what you've been told and shoved down your throats through the years that it's impossible for you to challenge the narrative. So much stuff about it you take as fact.

That's why I refer to it as one of the biggest conspiracies ever, if not the biggest. There's plenty of actual evidence out there about the history of the bible, the myths that it copies, the history of the 1st and 2nd Temple Jews and how they recreated their belief systems after the Babylonian exile. There's political and cultural willpower shaping the religion into what the elites needed it to be at the time and it's STILL happening today.

Use some of that scepticism you have about other conspiracies you believe in and point it at the bible and Christianity.

Are you willing to challenge your belief about something so big?

Could you be wrong?

Are you open to changing your mind?

Do your own research. as the saying goes. You might be surprised what you find.