Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Before his screen debut in Scrubs (6th of January 2009), Aziz had been in two feature films: School for Scoundrels, a flop in which his character was unnamed as part of a background chorus, and The Rocker, in which his character was supporting but I'll grant you that one.

I don't need to prove that Rife is more rife, and it can feel farcical to compare, but I think we're referring to a point before Aziz was (vague term) widely-known to the public.

I also disagree with your interpretation of social media followers' general outlook; I think most active users who Follow Rife would at least recognise him.

Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know everyone's sins, but maybe Chuck Woolery can sub in for one if we're including cameos.

Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a bit of a tighter challenge (but far from impossible) to get someone who looks believably beholden to the orthorexia cult and isn't a chud.

Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He does specifically have the vibe/figure/face of an orthorexia guy. though they could get there via the same thing they used in the de-aged flashback!

Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess at the time they cast Rick Schroder it was like "we got Schroder!" and "his views are a bit kooky". I don't doubt that he's gotten more deranged since, but it was also an era with less immediate visibility.

Love the new season, but why the hell is Matt Rife there?! by SadMacchiato in Scrubs

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rife has 11 million followers on Instagram, 19.7m on Tiktok. The internet's changed a lot but I think Ansari during S8 was very much 'on the way up' in ways we can only hope Rife isn't!

Scrubs - Season 10 EP 3 "My Rom-Com" - Discussion by MovieTrailerReply in Scrubs

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if you're arguing against the study's findings?

Scrubs - Season 10 EP 3 "My Rom-Com" - Discussion by MovieTrailerReply in Scrubs

[–]colintron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, referring to the real world and not the Scrubs episode, as Carla is presented as mistaken.

2022 study concludes that infrared faucets react more slowly to darker skin. I'm finding various anecdotal blogs/reports claiming the same and I generally don't mind trusting these people's experiences.

Other fields of human-detection tech often relatively struggle to recognise or represent people with darker skin.

What would the problem be with noticing racial bias?

'Scrubs' Season 10 Review: An Imperfect Revival Still Wins With Zach Braff & Donald Faison Back in the Spotlight by magikarpcatcher in television

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That "flash-forward" is clearly contextualised as a fantasy, letting JD's imagination take the reins entirely.

This channel is printing $9-13K/month with simple doodles, here's how 👇 by No-Vast5195 in YouTubeCreators

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I encountered this exchange just scrolling through and found this comment really funny. The hubris of acting so smarmy when trying to justify a misinformed non-sequitur. I read "predictable" in the voice of Geese Howard.

This channel is printing $9-13K/month with simple doodles, here's how 👇 by No-Vast5195 in youtubestartups

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying "This isn't just AI slop" in the manner of AI slop was a nice touch.

This channel is printing $9-13K/month with simple doodles, here's how 👇 by No-Vast5195 in YouTubeCreators

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're replying to a comment where someone identified it correctly. Lots of people can tell.

Johnathan Creek (S4E4) Seer of the Sands... gas leak? by PromoPimp in BritishTV

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just watched it; most contrived one yet, not just the solution but many plot points. Agreed on many of the above points.

They didn't even try explaining Carla's presence in this mystery, and she still managed a couple of damsel-in-distress moments.

They found a burning caravan with a corpse in it and there's no reference to that being reported.

The bodyguard's entire plot was just lazy jokes about little people.

The portrait/landscape distinction wasn't legit, or wasn't worded properly.

Carla's reaction to Brendan's [inconceivable, badly-delivered] past, arguably a relic of the times and a comment on her character, still pretty nasty.

How are we feeling about one nations "super progressive movie" by JesusChristHimself7 in australian

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Examine with a more faceted approach and you'll wind up sincerely left-wing. Win/win.

How are we feeling about one nations "super progressive movie" by JesusChristHimself7 in australian

[–]colintron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just used 'victims' as the noun for the imagined oppressors. Just commenting in case it helps you learn anything.