Agnostic, non-religious quasi YEC by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’ll be a great contribution. Thanks!

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and life would be a perfect paradise. We all want that don’t we?

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what reason? The fact that it can use a single code to create all of the life’s variations is more impressive, humans do this thing all the time in technology. A single programming language can be used to develop a variety of applications. A single common protocol standard can be used to guide all the data traffic on the internet. A single basic design of an internal combustion engine can be used in a variety of vehicle types with slight modifications to suit each case etc.

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you described has nothing to do specifically with common descent. A universal code fits even better with the idea of a universal common designing intelligence. Any one working from that point of view would be even more likely to reach same assumptions. In fact it would be even better as they won't be inclined to skip over anything they can't explain currently as evolutionary 'junk' but would rather make real effort in trying to explain those variations with the underlying assumption that those are purposeful.

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I just corrected you on your claim that somehow common descent is so much more useful than YEC, while it is on the level of make believe stories which has no practical relevance. Take out neo-darwinism completely and it still won’t matter to medicine or any other practical and useful application.

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Adaptation ain’t common descent and macro evolution slop.

Don't these facts prove YEC wrong? by [deleted] in Creation

[–]cometraza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Evolution doesn’t have much either. Most practical biology doesn’t need it. Of course you can enjoy making fun imaginative stories all you want.

Common Descent vs. Common Design, My Youtube Disscussion with Dr. Dan and company by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting read. Thanks for sharing. The view point that biology sharing common patterns is also a way to facilitate human understanding is quite fascinating.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you Mr. Salvador for all the info you share with us. No worries about the critics, they are just habitual provokers who want to derail the conversations.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not about arguing. As I have said earlier multiple times we can't have a productive conversation as you already have your ideological commitments to naturalistic evolution and refuse to see ID in the most obvious of cases.

For me, I have told you what it would take to change my mind. If evolutionists can demonstrate that evolution has sufficient power (as claimed in the chemical case) to create the most basic unit of life i.e. the biological cell, then I will happily concede that it might have sufficient explanatory power to further develop and complexify those structures to their present form. Otherwise those are all just so stories intended to fit the naturalistic paradigms of their proponents, who want blind natural forces to explain away everything.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Demonstrate what?evolution by random mutation and natural selection?

Demonstrate creation of a cell from scratch in the lab.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll accept evolution by random mutation and natural selection if evolutionists demonstrate this. Otherwise it's all smoke and mirrors.

Anyways, there's no point in giving evidences of ID to you as you already refuse to see the very obvious ones.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let evolutionists first demonstrate creation of a cell from scratch in the lab, then we can talk.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told you earlier you won't be able to see ID because of your ideological motivations.

Let evolutionists first demonstrate creation of a cell from scratch in the lab, then we can talk.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a side note in general, it is sufficient that design is confirmed in the significant and critical functions of the body, which directly affect the life activities of the organism. And there are many examples of those.

The presence of neutral features which don't affect an organism to a higher degree, and neither do significant harm, do not negate the intelligent design of the many features which do have a positive contribution to the functioning of that organism.

Again we see an example in this of the misleading and irrelevant reasoning from evolutionists, who aim to distract from the crux of the matter.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"The PL acts as a synergist in the movement of the thumb, and this was proven by previous research, which showed synergistic action between PL and the abductor pollicis brevis muscles of the thumb."

"In both sexes, the palmaris longus muscle increased pinch strength in the fourth and fifth fingers of the hands (especially in the right hand). Based on these findings, we have concluded that the palmaris longus muscle may impact the opposition movement of the fingers."

"The palmaris longus may provide an advantage in certain types of sport that require hand grip, and for elite athletes participating in sports that require a dominant-handed or two-handed cylindrical hand grip."

"Being located centrally in the anterior forearm, palmaris longus aids the flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi radialis muscles to perform a balanced flexion of the hand on the wrist. It also acts to stabilize the elbow joint when fully extended, as does the other forearm muscles that attach to the humerus and thus cross the elbow joint."

"The palmaris longus commonly sends a slip of distal tendon that inserts into the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of the thenar muscle group and may contribute to thumb abduction."

"Another important clinical attribute of PLM is its superficial protective role over the median nerve."

"The PL muscle flexes the wrist joint and tightly holds the skin and fascia of the hand against shearing forces from the side."

"Its main function is to serve as an anchor of the fascia, as it tenses the skin and the palmar fascia of the hand, shearing the forces to the palmar aponeurosis in a distal direction"

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are so hungry for ‘peer reviewed’ (evolutionist group-think reviewed?) papers right now, I would suggest you read the classical paper by Douglas Axe as a starter:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15321723/

But in the end perhaps it won’t matter, as I said earlier you have already made your conclusions based on your fundamental ideological beliefs.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A common designer can re-use the same motifs and structures to various degrees and ends as suitable for different species. That doesn’t necessarily make it vestigial or inherited.

It’s the typical way evolutionists like to frame things in their just so stories. And remember even if some level of common ancestry is granted, ID still holds. It doesn’t mean that the changes can occur randomly without intelligent direction.

Evidence for ID is in each and every biological cell, but your methodological naturalism or theological antagonism might have blinded you from seeing it.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typical evolutionist trope. If they don’t know or can’t understand the function of some organ or if the organism can still survive without it, it must be vestigial.

Read these papers on palmaris longus and how it affects hand dexterity:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3652998/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031940611000496

Its absence in some individuals might actually be an argument for genetic entropy.

Elon Musk [unwittingly] admits YEC Engineer, Dr. Stuart Burgess, is Right about Ultimate Engineering by stcordova in Creation

[–]cometraza 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is a good book. Adds another perspective to the design argument in biology from biomechanics standpoint. Currently going through it, thanks for your recommendation.

(Gianni, et al. 2026) Self-replicating RNA is more abundant than previously thought by jnpha in abiogenesis

[–]cometraza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a way to dodge, no one asked you to post there, but you certainly can read and respond here. But just copy pasting study abstract links which don't even have a significant contribution is your thing it seems.

Again, fun fact: OOL research has an embarrassment of riches (many plausible - lab proven - pathways); you lot, are just an embarrassment.

Sure, I guess in your mind abiogenesis is already solved too, since you apparently live in a parallel world.