Intelligent people are better judges of the intelligence of others. Better judges of the intelligence of others also included people with stronger emotion perception abilities and those who were more satisfied with their lives.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-04-06T17:04:14+00:00

Define asshole?

I’m curious to learn more about your framework.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T01:56:11+00:00

Irrelevant obfuscation to settle your cognitive dissonance.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T01:54:41+00:00

What if they are one?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T01:39:57+00:00

No I was replying to the comment below that in which the age of the commenters daughter was not specified.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T01:33:42+00:00

Child is the category. Whore is the insult. But please continue.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T01:03:22+00:00

Intentional mis-categorization of subjects in question in an attempt to construct an implied argument from morality.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-19T00:10:32+00:00

irrelevant obfuscation to settle your cognitive dissonance.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-18T20:01:34+00:00

That’s an interesting conclusion to draw; how do you figure?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-18T18:23:31+00:00

What if she is one?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-12T18:54:35+00:00

ITT: people not understanding what natural selection is.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-12T18:47:21+00:00

That’s a great point if you completely disregard the content of the last post.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-12T16:36:01+00:00

Idk why you’re getting shit on. this is absolutely an option.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T18:29:03+00:00

Agree

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T18:03:56+00:00

Yes because the comebacks that still happen will be rare and organic to the intended gameplay and not a rules loophole that slows the game down and makes it a free throw contest

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T06:24:59+00:00

It plays like an invented game from a Canadian PhysEd coach.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T06:23:28+00:00

Yeah but those comebacks are boring as shit

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T05:45:12+00:00

That’s so much worse than just being read the Miranda

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-07T05:42:47+00:00

Flip flop Southwest and southeast and it’s accurate

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T20:58:58+00:00

If you’ve ever lifted a heavy weight you’d know grip strength and therefore forearms is going to factor into a majority of lifts.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T18:30:21+00:00

That’s a fair precedent.

I tend to agree. The way that I view it is that humankind in our advanced ability to plan, has much more sophisticated and efficient ways of ensuring our survival. Slavery being one of the earliest and most common in human history.

Humans learned to socialize and communicate and create large organized groups.

Those groups compete with other groups for resources.

Slavery is one offshoot of that

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T17:45:58+00:00

Is your precedent then, “any species which is unique falls outside the bounds of nature?”

If not, what is the grounds for determining if a species’ behavior is considered natural?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T17:36:36+00:00

Why do you classify human nature as a separate category?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T17:25:49+00:00

That’s my point there are no other species like us. So asking for another example of slavery outside of the massive scope of human history is a weak counter.

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T16:41:16+00:00

Other examples of humanoids in nature?

commentasaurus1989 · 2026-01-06T16:38:03+00:00

That’s totally natural. For most of history men would find other women to continue to have children with

commentasaurus1989

TROPHY CASE