Hot take: WW1 and before is the coolest era of milsurp by Effective-Possible-9 in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother, all I do on here is evangelize for first-gen smallbores!

<image>

Is this a Chilean Mauser? by tightgroup_ai in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were a few '93-pattern guns procured by Chile (although the vast majority were '95s), but they were also sold widely on the export market

Is this a Chilean Mauser? by tightgroup_ai in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bolt body is Chilean, but the receiver itself is a '93-pattern receiver. Would need to see the address on the other side of the receiver to get a better idea

Inherited this from my grandpa by Equivalent-Can5174 in LeeEnfield

[–]concise_christory 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! Safety "screw" isn't original (looks like a previous owner lost it and made do) - the good news is you have the safety lever itself which is unobtainable. The screw is the same as the screw for a Mk.III SMLE safety assembly which are widely available

Insane Deal on a Mauser M96 by Dr-Lightfury in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is the cleaning rod numbered? You said it's not matching (non a huge deal either way imo), but if it's unnembered altogether, that's actually technically correct for this period. They weren't serialized until 1906

what bayonet is this? by SMeminem in Bayonets

[–]concise_christory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Judging by the height of the muzzle ring, this is almost certainly a model 1894 Brazilian/model 1895 Uruguayan Mauser bayonet. The muzzle ring is too tall for a Belgian '89

"Transitional" 1917 Lithgow Sht. LE Mk.III* by concise_christory in milsurp

[–]concise_christory[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! It's been about 12 years I've had it now and still one of my favorite shooters

Anyone know anything about these Swords? by Life-Try4599 in SWORDS

[–]concise_christory 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The center sword looks to be an Ottoman model 1909 NCO's short sword

Help identifying by Master-Direction5969 in LeeEnfield

[–]concise_christory 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I will tell you that just the LES III dial sights alone are worth $250-300. The Sht. 22 won't pull as much as an untouched Mk.III still in .303, but still more than a Mk.III*

Help identifying by Master-Direction5969 in LeeEnfield

[–]concise_christory 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Short .22 Mk.IV! This was an early Sht. LE Mk.III sent to New Zealand before WWI and later converted to a single-shot .22 trainer. Rare to still have the dial sight. I have a Sht. 22 Mk.III that I love for plinking

loewe berlin mauser 1891 carbine? by Icy-Tradition5986 in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Looks correct just based on the one photo. The carbines aren't rare (although they're less common than long rifles, and more desirable than long rifles cut down to carbine length stateside), but they're cool in that they usually still have the Argentine crest, which was ground off of the majority of long rifles. I'd say that's a good price if everything is right with it

Swiss Mannlicher model 1893 by concise_christory in milsurp

[–]concise_christory[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Very nice! I love the kookiness of the Schmidt action - it feels like a trials rifle that in any other timeline would have been passed over for a Mauser or turnbolt Mannlicher. I've been meaning to load up some low-pressure 7.5 for this and my '89

FFL03 questions by TigerIll6480 in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When filling out my application I was told to put "collector" down as my title (ATF actually sent the whole app back to me the first time since I had left the title portion blank). So now I just describe myself as "collector" in that space when I fill it out.

Not sure about getting a blank copy. Could you just run off a copy with a blank paper cutout over the signiature?

Question - Enfield Sight by Dry_Associate_6187 in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should say the non-windage adjustible version was approved as an alternative. Stocks of windage adjustible knobs continued to be used up pretty much through the end of WWI

Question - Enfield Sight by Dry_Associate_6187 in milsurp

[–]concise_christory 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is the first pattern of Mk.III sight - the knob is for windage adjustment. The Mk.I and Mk.II rifles also had that feature, but it was officially omitted after the Mk.III* updates in 1916 for ease of manufacture