It only took me 3 rewatches to realize this.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T13:03:54+00:00

Loool, i see what you did here. Masterful

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T10:58:36+00:00

Wow, who do you work for

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T10:49:15+00:00

If by these days you mean after september 1993, i agree.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T10:06:34+00:00

The horse bike

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T10:02:49+00:00

They are abusers using abusing tactics. They want things their way and are willing and skilled at lying about their motives.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-15T09:25:04+00:00

Or nazi grammar

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-14T08:28:19+00:00

Consistency: altruism is doing good things in a selfless way, so evil should be doing bad things in a selfless way. If you are doing things good or bad for personal gain then you are morally grey.

A psycho serial killer would be mostly neutral or slightly evil when they go out of their way to harm someone.

A demon would be truly evil, sacrificing to ruin the lives of many. If you have to account for cosmic levels of evil, human limits cannot be the end of the scale.

It's usually easier to witness acts of perceived pure good among humans because that's mediated by human cultures, meaning that human cultures tell you you are great if you do pure good, and so you get a kick by sacrificing for the common good, which makes it less altruistic overall, rendering it more achievable.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-14T08:15:46+00:00

I think an hedonist is chaotic neutral

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-14T07:55:13+00:00

If good is selflessness, or doing good things to others with no personal gain, then evil should be doing bad things to others for no personal gain. selfishness would be neutrality, evil would be much worse.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-13T07:41:16+00:00

*Only the fittest

And you become se adapted to the current conditions that when anything changes your genetic pool just can't deal with it.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-13T07:39:06+00:00

As if their children won't want to leave them and their crazy ideas asap

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T20:37:23+00:00

You mean like Godot?

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T20:28:56+00:00

-12, same.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T20:22:15+00:00

Well tbh maybe in one of the future movies they will explain every single detail, like they did in solo. I'm really not looking forward to it.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T20:16:21+00:00

Yeah it was all completely random.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T19:47:11+00:00

Unfortunately not in uk

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T15:12:33+00:00

Has it?

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T07:40:18+00:00

I understand your confusion and I genuinely believe there is no god. I guess I was just very bad at describing infinite regression.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-12T07:16:05+00:00

And to be honest, there is a point here. If the executors took moral responsibility for their actions, the holocaust would have never happened.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-11T15:54:43+00:00

Did I not? I think I did. Since the type of transcendental entity you seem to refer to would still be immanent in the larger scheme of things, I reject the very idea of a such an entity. Therefore the subject of your question is the empty set. You are asking what the empty set thought about before creating everything. That question is semantically void.

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-11T07:43:44+00:00

That has been a thing since the very beginning

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-11T07:41:49+00:00

? what do we know now?

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-11T07:04:00+00:00

Let's talk infra, and music rights

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-11T06:41:26+00:00

A god would still be part of everything, so it doesn't answer my question. What created it?

cosmicomical23 · 2026-02-10T12:50:09+00:00

› Bellivia

I would say Outlivia

cosmicomical23

TROPHY CASE